Abstract
European national metrology institutes use calibration
systems of various types for calibrating thermometers in
air. These were compared to each other for the first time
in a project organized by the European Association of
National Metrology Institutes (EURAMET). This EURAMET
P1061 comparison project had two main objectives: (1) to
study the equivalence of calibrations performed by
different laboratories and (2) to investigate
correlations between calibration methods and achievable
uncertainties. The comparison was realized using a pair
of 100 {\omega} platinum resistance thermometer probes
connected to a digital thermometer bridge as the transfer
standard. The probes had different dimensions and surface
properties. The measurements covered the temperature
range between -40°C and +50°C , but each laboratory chose
a subrange most relevant to its scope and performed
measurements at five nominal temperature points covering
the subrange. To enable comparison between the
laboratories, comparison reference functions were
determined using weighted least-squares fitting. Various
effects related to variations in heat transfer conditions
were demonstrated but clear correlations to specific
characteristics of calibration system were not
identified. Calibrations in air and liquid agreed
typically within ±0.05°C at +10°C and +80°C . Expanded
uncertainties determined by the participants ranged from
0.02°C to 0.4°C and they were shown to be realistic in
most cases.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1251-1272 |
Journal | International Journal of Thermophysics |
Volume | 35 |
Issue number | 6-7 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Keywords
- air temperature
- calibration
- EURAMET
- heat transfer
- intercomparison