Comparison of different pH measurement methods in meat

Osmo Mäki-Petäys, H. Korkeala, Timo Alanko, Olli Sorvettula

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The accuracy of portable pH meters and the nitrazine yellow method was compared with the reference method by determining the pH of 74 beef and 96 pork muscles. The pH was measured directly from the muscle. The results showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) between the different electrometric combinations. Combinations of portable pH meters with puncture electrodes gave systematically higher pH values than the reference method. These differences were not very large but they may be of practical significance. The use of a piercing cover on the electrode to help the insertion of the electrode into the meat is not recommended, since it may cause a rise in pH values. Electrometric methods were found to be more precise than the nitrazine yellow method. On the basis of these findings there still is a need of further harmonization of the methods used for pH measurement of meat.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)123 - 129
Number of pages7
JournalActa Veterinaria Scandinavica
Volume32
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1991
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Meat
meat
electrodes
Electrodes
meters (equipment)
methodology
Muscles
muscles
Punctures
normal values
pork
Reference Values
beef

Cite this

Mäki-Petäys, O., Korkeala, H., Alanko, T., & Sorvettula, O. (1991). Comparison of different pH measurement methods in meat. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 32(1), 123 - 129.
Mäki-Petäys, Osmo ; Korkeala, H. ; Alanko, Timo ; Sorvettula, Olli. / Comparison of different pH measurement methods in meat. In: Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica. 1991 ; Vol. 32, No. 1. pp. 123 - 129.
@article{b55ea09ab6984cb3b20eef7ed6b2ca97,
title = "Comparison of different pH measurement methods in meat",
abstract = "The accuracy of portable pH meters and the nitrazine yellow method was compared with the reference method by determining the pH of 74 beef and 96 pork muscles. The pH was measured directly from the muscle. The results showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) between the different electrometric combinations. Combinations of portable pH meters with puncture electrodes gave systematically higher pH values than the reference method. These differences were not very large but they may be of practical significance. The use of a piercing cover on the electrode to help the insertion of the electrode into the meat is not recommended, since it may cause a rise in pH values. Electrometric methods were found to be more precise than the nitrazine yellow method. On the basis of these findings there still is a need of further harmonization of the methods used for pH measurement of meat.",
author = "Osmo M{\"a}ki-Pet{\"a}ys and H. Korkeala and Timo Alanko and Olli Sorvettula",
year = "1991",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "123 -- 129",
journal = "Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica",
issn = "0044-605X",
number = "1",

}

Mäki-Petäys, O, Korkeala, H, Alanko, T & Sorvettula, O 1991, 'Comparison of different pH measurement methods in meat', Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 123 - 129.

Comparison of different pH measurement methods in meat. / Mäki-Petäys, Osmo; Korkeala, H.; Alanko, Timo; Sorvettula, Olli.

In: Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, Vol. 32, No. 1, 1991, p. 123 - 129.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of different pH measurement methods in meat

AU - Mäki-Petäys, Osmo

AU - Korkeala, H.

AU - Alanko, Timo

AU - Sorvettula, Olli

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - The accuracy of portable pH meters and the nitrazine yellow method was compared with the reference method by determining the pH of 74 beef and 96 pork muscles. The pH was measured directly from the muscle. The results showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) between the different electrometric combinations. Combinations of portable pH meters with puncture electrodes gave systematically higher pH values than the reference method. These differences were not very large but they may be of practical significance. The use of a piercing cover on the electrode to help the insertion of the electrode into the meat is not recommended, since it may cause a rise in pH values. Electrometric methods were found to be more precise than the nitrazine yellow method. On the basis of these findings there still is a need of further harmonization of the methods used for pH measurement of meat.

AB - The accuracy of portable pH meters and the nitrazine yellow method was compared with the reference method by determining the pH of 74 beef and 96 pork muscles. The pH was measured directly from the muscle. The results showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) between the different electrometric combinations. Combinations of portable pH meters with puncture electrodes gave systematically higher pH values than the reference method. These differences were not very large but they may be of practical significance. The use of a piercing cover on the electrode to help the insertion of the electrode into the meat is not recommended, since it may cause a rise in pH values. Electrometric methods were found to be more precise than the nitrazine yellow method. On the basis of these findings there still is a need of further harmonization of the methods used for pH measurement of meat.

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 123

EP - 129

JO - Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica

JF - Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica

SN - 0044-605X

IS - 1

ER -

Mäki-Petäys O, Korkeala H, Alanko T, Sorvettula O. Comparison of different pH measurement methods in meat. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica. 1991;32(1):123 - 129.