Comparison of elicitation methods for moral and affective beliefs in the theory of planned behaviour

M. Dean (Corresponding Author), Anne Arvola, M. Vassallo, Liisa Lähteenmäki, M. M. Raats, A. Saba, R. Shepherd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) has been applied successfully in the area of food choice, it has been criticized for its pure utilitarian approach to the factors determining behaviour. Despite the increase in predictive power of the model with added components such as affective attitude and moral and ethical concerns, in most studies the elicitation process still only addresses people's utilitarian beliefs about the behaviour with little attention paid to other aspects. This study compares the traditional method of elicitation of advantages and disadvantages with two other methods (word association and open-ended) in the elicitations of beliefs, attitudes and moral concerns in relation to the consumption of organic foods. Results show the traditional method to be best for eliciting cognitive beliefs, open-ended emotion task for eliciting emotional beliefs and open-ended beliefs task best for moral concerns. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)244-252
Number of pages9
JournalAppetite
Volume47
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Organic Food
Emotions
Food

Keywords

  • Theory of planned behaviour
  • Affect
  • Moral
  • Elicitation methods
  • Organic
  • Comparison

Cite this

Dean, M., Arvola, A., Vassallo, M., Lähteenmäki, L., Raats, M. M., Saba, A., & Shepherd, R. (2006). Comparison of elicitation methods for moral and affective beliefs in the theory of planned behaviour. Appetite, 47(2), 244-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2006.04.005
Dean, M. ; Arvola, Anne ; Vassallo, M. ; Lähteenmäki, Liisa ; Raats, M. M. ; Saba, A. ; Shepherd, R. / Comparison of elicitation methods for moral and affective beliefs in the theory of planned behaviour. In: Appetite. 2006 ; Vol. 47, No. 2. pp. 244-252.
@article{109bcc7603fe4dc38cbdede5334687e6,
title = "Comparison of elicitation methods for moral and affective beliefs in the theory of planned behaviour",
abstract = "Although the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) has been applied successfully in the area of food choice, it has been criticized for its pure utilitarian approach to the factors determining behaviour. Despite the increase in predictive power of the model with added components such as affective attitude and moral and ethical concerns, in most studies the elicitation process still only addresses people's utilitarian beliefs about the behaviour with little attention paid to other aspects. This study compares the traditional method of elicitation of advantages and disadvantages with two other methods (word association and open-ended) in the elicitations of beliefs, attitudes and moral concerns in relation to the consumption of organic foods. Results show the traditional method to be best for eliciting cognitive beliefs, open-ended emotion task for eliciting emotional beliefs and open-ended beliefs task best for moral concerns. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed.",
keywords = "Theory of planned behaviour, Affect, Moral, Elicitation methods, Organic, Comparison",
author = "M. Dean and Anne Arvola and M. Vassallo and Liisa L{\"a}hteenm{\"a}ki and Raats, {M. M.} and A. Saba and R. Shepherd",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1016/j.appet.2006.04.005",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "244--252",
journal = "Appetite",
issn = "0195-6663",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

Dean, M, Arvola, A, Vassallo, M, Lähteenmäki, L, Raats, MM, Saba, A & Shepherd, R 2006, 'Comparison of elicitation methods for moral and affective beliefs in the theory of planned behaviour', Appetite, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 244-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2006.04.005

Comparison of elicitation methods for moral and affective beliefs in the theory of planned behaviour. / Dean, M. (Corresponding Author); Arvola, Anne; Vassallo, M.; Lähteenmäki, Liisa; Raats, M. M.; Saba, A.; Shepherd, R.

In: Appetite, Vol. 47, No. 2, 2006, p. 244-252.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of elicitation methods for moral and affective beliefs in the theory of planned behaviour

AU - Dean, M.

AU - Arvola, Anne

AU - Vassallo, M.

AU - Lähteenmäki, Liisa

AU - Raats, M. M.

AU - Saba, A.

AU - Shepherd, R.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Although the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) has been applied successfully in the area of food choice, it has been criticized for its pure utilitarian approach to the factors determining behaviour. Despite the increase in predictive power of the model with added components such as affective attitude and moral and ethical concerns, in most studies the elicitation process still only addresses people's utilitarian beliefs about the behaviour with little attention paid to other aspects. This study compares the traditional method of elicitation of advantages and disadvantages with two other methods (word association and open-ended) in the elicitations of beliefs, attitudes and moral concerns in relation to the consumption of organic foods. Results show the traditional method to be best for eliciting cognitive beliefs, open-ended emotion task for eliciting emotional beliefs and open-ended beliefs task best for moral concerns. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed.

AB - Although the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) has been applied successfully in the area of food choice, it has been criticized for its pure utilitarian approach to the factors determining behaviour. Despite the increase in predictive power of the model with added components such as affective attitude and moral and ethical concerns, in most studies the elicitation process still only addresses people's utilitarian beliefs about the behaviour with little attention paid to other aspects. This study compares the traditional method of elicitation of advantages and disadvantages with two other methods (word association and open-ended) in the elicitations of beliefs, attitudes and moral concerns in relation to the consumption of organic foods. Results show the traditional method to be best for eliciting cognitive beliefs, open-ended emotion task for eliciting emotional beliefs and open-ended beliefs task best for moral concerns. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed.

KW - Theory of planned behaviour

KW - Affect

KW - Moral

KW - Elicitation methods

KW - Organic

KW - Comparison

U2 - 10.1016/j.appet.2006.04.005

DO - 10.1016/j.appet.2006.04.005

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 244

EP - 252

JO - Appetite

JF - Appetite

SN - 0195-6663

IS - 2

ER -