TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of enzymatic and pH shift methods to extract protein from whole Baltic herring (Clupea harengus membras) and roach (Rutilus rutilus)
AU - Nisov, Anni
AU - Kakko, Tanja
AU - Alakomi, Hanna Leena
AU - Lantto, Raija
AU - Honkapää, Kaisu
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Finnish Operational Program of European Maritime and Fisheries Fund as a part of the fishing innovation program “Blue Products”. The authors would like to acknowledge Saila Kivijärvi (for her contribution as a Masters’ thesis student in this study), Leila Kostamo, Riitta Pasanen, Marja-Liisa Jalovaara, Anni Kortekangas, Anna Pugas and Annelie Damerau for their skilful technical assistance.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s)
PY - 2022/3/30
Y1 - 2022/3/30
N2 - This study aimed to establish the differences between enzymatically extracted hydrolysates and pH shifted protein isolates from whole Baltic herring and roach in terms of polypeptide patterns, functionality, sensory properties, microbial quality, yield, and composition. Alkaline extraction resulted in the highest yields, whereas the hydrolysates showed the highest protein contents. The hydrolysates showed higher protein solubility (86.0–88.5%) than the protein isolates (5.1–14.5%) as well as the higher foam capacity for Baltic herring. However, for roach, alkaline extracted protein isolates exhibited the highest foam capacity. All hydrolysates showed poor foam stability (0–13%) while the protein isolates showed notably higher stability (30–55%). The hydrolysates showed relatively low bitterness, whereas alkaline extracted roach proteins were perceived as bitter. This study demonstrated that it was possible to produce protein isolates and hydrolysates from whole fish with good microbial quality. However, both processes need to be optimised according to the food application and fish species.
AB - This study aimed to establish the differences between enzymatically extracted hydrolysates and pH shifted protein isolates from whole Baltic herring and roach in terms of polypeptide patterns, functionality, sensory properties, microbial quality, yield, and composition. Alkaline extraction resulted in the highest yields, whereas the hydrolysates showed the highest protein contents. The hydrolysates showed higher protein solubility (86.0–88.5%) than the protein isolates (5.1–14.5%) as well as the higher foam capacity for Baltic herring. However, for roach, alkaline extracted protein isolates exhibited the highest foam capacity. All hydrolysates showed poor foam stability (0–13%) while the protein isolates showed notably higher stability (30–55%). The hydrolysates showed relatively low bitterness, whereas alkaline extracted roach proteins were perceived as bitter. This study demonstrated that it was possible to produce protein isolates and hydrolysates from whole fish with good microbial quality. However, both processes need to be optimised according to the food application and fish species.
KW - Enzymatic hydrolysis
KW - Functional properties
KW - Microbiology
KW - pH shift process
KW - Sensory properties
KW - Undervalued fish
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118994544&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131524
DO - 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131524
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85118994544
SN - 0308-8146
VL - 373
JO - Food Chemistry
JF - Food Chemistry
IS - Part B
M1 - 131524
ER -