Comparison of Japanese and European fire classification systems for surface linings

Tuula Hakkarainen, Yoshihiko Hayashi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

A comparison of the Japanese and European fire classification systems for surface linings is presented focusing on heat release. The fire test methods and criteria for product classes are described, as well as the background of the class limits.
The Japanese and European fire classification systems have a common reference scenario: fire in a small room. The test methods used in the classification are different in Japan and Europe, but the basic principle in the definition of the product performance classes is the same.

The main test methods for heat release of construction products in the Japanese and European fire classification systems are the cone calorimeter and the SBI test, respectively. A one-dimensional thermal flame spread model was applied to predict SBI test results on the basis of cone calorimeter data. A good correlation between the experimental and predicted Euroclasses was found.

The Japanese and European classifications on the basis of the cone calorimeter and SBI tests were compared for a series of 33 building products. For the majority of products, the classification systems are well consistent. However, different test methods and classification parameters cause inconsistencies in certain cases. The correspondence of classifications can be found by examining the product type and composition, and considering the features of the main fire tests of the classification systems.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19-42
Number of pages24
JournalFire Science and Technology
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Linings
Fires
Calorimeters
Cones
Chemical analysis

Keywords

  • building products
  • cone calorimeter
  • Euroclasses
  • fire classification
  • fire modelling
  • fire safety
  • fire tests
  • flame spread
  • heat release
  • room/corner test
  • SBI
  • surface linings

Cite this

@article{f517dc90f3ba4064a1d0f403be60f4f3,
title = "Comparison of Japanese and European fire classification systems for surface linings",
abstract = "A comparison of the Japanese and European fire classification systems for surface linings is presented focusing on heat release. The fire test methods and criteria for product classes are described, as well as the background of the class limits.The Japanese and European fire classification systems have a common reference scenario: fire in a small room. The test methods used in the classification are different in Japan and Europe, but the basic principle in the definition of the product performance classes is the same. The main test methods for heat release of construction products in the Japanese and European fire classification systems are the cone calorimeter and the SBI test, respectively. A one-dimensional thermal flame spread model was applied to predict SBI test results on the basis of cone calorimeter data. A good correlation between the experimental and predicted Euroclasses was found. The Japanese and European classifications on the basis of the cone calorimeter and SBI tests were compared for a series of 33 building products. For the majority of products, the classification systems are well consistent. However, different test methods and classification parameters cause inconsistencies in certain cases. The correspondence of classifications can be found by examining the product type and composition, and considering the features of the main fire tests of the classification systems.",
keywords = "building products, cone calorimeter, Euroclasses, fire classification, fire modelling, fire safety, fire tests, flame spread, heat release, room/corner test, SBI, surface linings",
author = "Tuula Hakkarainen and Yoshihiko Hayashi",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.3210/fst.21.19",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "19--42",
journal = "Fire Science and Technology",
issn = "0285-9521",
publisher = "Science University of Tokyo",
number = "1",

}

Comparison of Japanese and European fire classification systems for surface linings. / Hakkarainen, Tuula; Hayashi, Yoshihiko.

In: Fire Science and Technology, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2001, p. 19-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Japanese and European fire classification systems for surface linings

AU - Hakkarainen, Tuula

AU - Hayashi, Yoshihiko

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - A comparison of the Japanese and European fire classification systems for surface linings is presented focusing on heat release. The fire test methods and criteria for product classes are described, as well as the background of the class limits.The Japanese and European fire classification systems have a common reference scenario: fire in a small room. The test methods used in the classification are different in Japan and Europe, but the basic principle in the definition of the product performance classes is the same. The main test methods for heat release of construction products in the Japanese and European fire classification systems are the cone calorimeter and the SBI test, respectively. A one-dimensional thermal flame spread model was applied to predict SBI test results on the basis of cone calorimeter data. A good correlation between the experimental and predicted Euroclasses was found. The Japanese and European classifications on the basis of the cone calorimeter and SBI tests were compared for a series of 33 building products. For the majority of products, the classification systems are well consistent. However, different test methods and classification parameters cause inconsistencies in certain cases. The correspondence of classifications can be found by examining the product type and composition, and considering the features of the main fire tests of the classification systems.

AB - A comparison of the Japanese and European fire classification systems for surface linings is presented focusing on heat release. The fire test methods and criteria for product classes are described, as well as the background of the class limits.The Japanese and European fire classification systems have a common reference scenario: fire in a small room. The test methods used in the classification are different in Japan and Europe, but the basic principle in the definition of the product performance classes is the same. The main test methods for heat release of construction products in the Japanese and European fire classification systems are the cone calorimeter and the SBI test, respectively. A one-dimensional thermal flame spread model was applied to predict SBI test results on the basis of cone calorimeter data. A good correlation between the experimental and predicted Euroclasses was found. The Japanese and European classifications on the basis of the cone calorimeter and SBI tests were compared for a series of 33 building products. For the majority of products, the classification systems are well consistent. However, different test methods and classification parameters cause inconsistencies in certain cases. The correspondence of classifications can be found by examining the product type and composition, and considering the features of the main fire tests of the classification systems.

KW - building products

KW - cone calorimeter

KW - Euroclasses

KW - fire classification

KW - fire modelling

KW - fire safety

KW - fire tests

KW - flame spread

KW - heat release

KW - room/corner test

KW - SBI

KW - surface linings

U2 - 10.3210/fst.21.19

DO - 10.3210/fst.21.19

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 19

EP - 42

JO - Fire Science and Technology

JF - Fire Science and Technology

SN - 0285-9521

IS - 1

ER -