Comparison of Japanese and European fire classification systems for surface linings

Tuula Hakkarainen, Yoshihiko Hayashi

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    A comparison of the Japanese and European fire classification systems for surface linings is presented focusing on heat release. The fire test methods and criteria for product classes are described, as well as the background of the class limits.
    The Japanese and European fire classification systems have a common reference scenario: fire in a small room. The test methods used in the classification are different in Japan and Europe, but the basic principle in the definition of the product performance classes is the same.

    The main test methods for heat release of construction products in the Japanese and European fire classification systems are the cone calorimeter and the SBI test, respectively. A one-dimensional thermal flame spread model was applied to predict SBI test results on the basis of cone calorimeter data. A good correlation between the experimental and predicted Euroclasses was found.

    The Japanese and European classifications on the basis of the cone calorimeter and SBI tests were compared for a series of 33 building products. For the majority of products, the classification systems are well consistent. However, different test methods and classification parameters cause inconsistencies in certain cases. The correspondence of classifications can be found by examining the product type and composition, and considering the features of the main fire tests of the classification systems.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)19-42
    Number of pages24
    JournalFire Science and Technology
    Volume21
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2001
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Fingerprint

    Linings
    Fires
    Calorimeters
    Cones
    Chemical analysis

    Keywords

    • building products
    • cone calorimeter
    • Euroclasses
    • fire classification
    • fire modelling
    • fire safety
    • fire tests
    • flame spread
    • heat release
    • room/corner test
    • SBI
    • surface linings

    Cite this

    @article{f517dc90f3ba4064a1d0f403be60f4f3,
    title = "Comparison of Japanese and European fire classification systems for surface linings",
    abstract = "A comparison of the Japanese and European fire classification systems for surface linings is presented focusing on heat release. The fire test methods and criteria for product classes are described, as well as the background of the class limits.The Japanese and European fire classification systems have a common reference scenario: fire in a small room. The test methods used in the classification are different in Japan and Europe, but the basic principle in the definition of the product performance classes is the same. The main test methods for heat release of construction products in the Japanese and European fire classification systems are the cone calorimeter and the SBI test, respectively. A one-dimensional thermal flame spread model was applied to predict SBI test results on the basis of cone calorimeter data. A good correlation between the experimental and predicted Euroclasses was found. The Japanese and European classifications on the basis of the cone calorimeter and SBI tests were compared for a series of 33 building products. For the majority of products, the classification systems are well consistent. However, different test methods and classification parameters cause inconsistencies in certain cases. The correspondence of classifications can be found by examining the product type and composition, and considering the features of the main fire tests of the classification systems.",
    keywords = "building products, cone calorimeter, Euroclasses, fire classification, fire modelling, fire safety, fire tests, flame spread, heat release, room/corner test, SBI, surface linings",
    author = "Tuula Hakkarainen and Yoshihiko Hayashi",
    year = "2001",
    doi = "10.3210/fst.21.19",
    language = "English",
    volume = "21",
    pages = "19--42",
    journal = "Fire Science and Technology",
    issn = "0285-9521",
    publisher = "Science University of Tokyo",
    number = "1",

    }

    Comparison of Japanese and European fire classification systems for surface linings. / Hakkarainen, Tuula; Hayashi, Yoshihiko.

    In: Fire Science and Technology, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2001, p. 19-42.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Comparison of Japanese and European fire classification systems for surface linings

    AU - Hakkarainen, Tuula

    AU - Hayashi, Yoshihiko

    PY - 2001

    Y1 - 2001

    N2 - A comparison of the Japanese and European fire classification systems for surface linings is presented focusing on heat release. The fire test methods and criteria for product classes are described, as well as the background of the class limits.The Japanese and European fire classification systems have a common reference scenario: fire in a small room. The test methods used in the classification are different in Japan and Europe, but the basic principle in the definition of the product performance classes is the same. The main test methods for heat release of construction products in the Japanese and European fire classification systems are the cone calorimeter and the SBI test, respectively. A one-dimensional thermal flame spread model was applied to predict SBI test results on the basis of cone calorimeter data. A good correlation between the experimental and predicted Euroclasses was found. The Japanese and European classifications on the basis of the cone calorimeter and SBI tests were compared for a series of 33 building products. For the majority of products, the classification systems are well consistent. However, different test methods and classification parameters cause inconsistencies in certain cases. The correspondence of classifications can be found by examining the product type and composition, and considering the features of the main fire tests of the classification systems.

    AB - A comparison of the Japanese and European fire classification systems for surface linings is presented focusing on heat release. The fire test methods and criteria for product classes are described, as well as the background of the class limits.The Japanese and European fire classification systems have a common reference scenario: fire in a small room. The test methods used in the classification are different in Japan and Europe, but the basic principle in the definition of the product performance classes is the same. The main test methods for heat release of construction products in the Japanese and European fire classification systems are the cone calorimeter and the SBI test, respectively. A one-dimensional thermal flame spread model was applied to predict SBI test results on the basis of cone calorimeter data. A good correlation between the experimental and predicted Euroclasses was found. The Japanese and European classifications on the basis of the cone calorimeter and SBI tests were compared for a series of 33 building products. For the majority of products, the classification systems are well consistent. However, different test methods and classification parameters cause inconsistencies in certain cases. The correspondence of classifications can be found by examining the product type and composition, and considering the features of the main fire tests of the classification systems.

    KW - building products

    KW - cone calorimeter

    KW - Euroclasses

    KW - fire classification

    KW - fire modelling

    KW - fire safety

    KW - fire tests

    KW - flame spread

    KW - heat release

    KW - room/corner test

    KW - SBI

    KW - surface linings

    U2 - 10.3210/fst.21.19

    DO - 10.3210/fst.21.19

    M3 - Article

    VL - 21

    SP - 19

    EP - 42

    JO - Fire Science and Technology

    JF - Fire Science and Technology

    SN - 0285-9521

    IS - 1

    ER -