Comparison of laser welding methods in position welding of edge joint of austenitic stainless steel

Miikka Karhu, Veli Kujanpää, Mikko Pesari, Bruno Levesy

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

Abstract

An edge joint 2+2 mm thickness of ordinary austenitic stainless steel sheets was studied in all-position laser welding; flat (PA), vertical-up (PF), vertical-down (PG) and overhead (PE) positions. The penetration depth of the weld was aimed to be at minimum 3.0 mm. The optimal width of the weld was around 2 mm to guarantee adequate tolerances for the weld, but to avoid excessive melting of the edges of the sheets. In addition, the tolerance for the misalignment of the laser beam was tested. The welding procedure was tested with three laser welding methods, including de-focused laser beam, laser beam scanning and twin-spot laser beam welding in order to develop and find means to deploy laser welding robustly and reliably in practical applications. According to the results of welding test trials, the used configuration of twin-spot process seemed to be the most appropriate one among the tested welding methods to guarantee all position welding capability with constant suitable width and depth of weld penetration.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings 14th NOLAMP Conference
Subtitle of host publicationThe 14th Nordic Laser Materials Processing Conference
Place of PublicationLuleå, Sweden
PublisherLuleå University of Technology
Pages47-58
ISBN (Electronic)978-91-7439-689-8
ISBN (Print)978-91-7439-688-1
Publication statusPublished - 2013
MoE publication typeNot Eligible
Event14th Nordic Laser Materials Processing Conference, NOLAMP 14 - Gothenburg, Sweden
Duration: 26 Aug 201328 Aug 2013
Conference number: 14

Conference

Conference14th Nordic Laser Materials Processing Conference, NOLAMP 14
Abbreviated titleNOLAMP 14
CountrySweden
CityGothenburg
Period26/08/1328/08/13

Fingerprint

Laser beam welding
Austenitic stainless steel
Welding
Welds
Laser beams
Steel sheet
Melting
Scanning

Keywords

  • twin-spot
  • laser beam scanning
  • positional welding
  • edge joint
  • austenitic stainless steel

Cite this

Karhu, M., Kujanpää, V., Pesari, M., & Levesy, B. (2013). Comparison of laser welding methods in position welding of edge joint of austenitic stainless steel. In Proceedings 14th NOLAMP Conference : The 14th Nordic Laser Materials Processing Conference (pp. 47-58). Luleå, Sweden: Luleå University of Technology.
Karhu, Miikka ; Kujanpää, Veli ; Pesari, Mikko ; Levesy, Bruno. / Comparison of laser welding methods in position welding of edge joint of austenitic stainless steel. Proceedings 14th NOLAMP Conference : The 14th Nordic Laser Materials Processing Conference. Luleå, Sweden : Luleå University of Technology, 2013. pp. 47-58
@inproceedings{957bd086c6fe4b58a762df96dc2b4fdf,
title = "Comparison of laser welding methods in position welding of edge joint of austenitic stainless steel",
abstract = "An edge joint 2+2 mm thickness of ordinary austenitic stainless steel sheets was studied in all-position laser welding; flat (PA), vertical-up (PF), vertical-down (PG) and overhead (PE) positions. The penetration depth of the weld was aimed to be at minimum 3.0 mm. The optimal width of the weld was around 2 mm to guarantee adequate tolerances for the weld, but to avoid excessive melting of the edges of the sheets. In addition, the tolerance for the misalignment of the laser beam was tested. The welding procedure was tested with three laser welding methods, including de-focused laser beam, laser beam scanning and twin-spot laser beam welding in order to develop and find means to deploy laser welding robustly and reliably in practical applications. According to the results of welding test trials, the used configuration of twin-spot process seemed to be the most appropriate one among the tested welding methods to guarantee all position welding capability with constant suitable width and depth of weld penetration.",
keywords = "twin-spot, laser beam scanning, positional welding, edge joint, austenitic stainless steel",
author = "Miikka Karhu and Veli Kujanp{\"a}{\"a} and Mikko Pesari and Bruno Levesy",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-91-7439-688-1",
pages = "47--58",
booktitle = "Proceedings 14th NOLAMP Conference",
publisher = "Lule{\aa} University of Technology",
address = "Sweden",

}

Karhu, M, Kujanpää, V, Pesari, M & Levesy, B 2013, Comparison of laser welding methods in position welding of edge joint of austenitic stainless steel. in Proceedings 14th NOLAMP Conference : The 14th Nordic Laser Materials Processing Conference. Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden, pp. 47-58, 14th Nordic Laser Materials Processing Conference, NOLAMP 14, Gothenburg, Sweden, 26/08/13.

Comparison of laser welding methods in position welding of edge joint of austenitic stainless steel. / Karhu, Miikka; Kujanpää, Veli; Pesari, Mikko; Levesy, Bruno.

Proceedings 14th NOLAMP Conference : The 14th Nordic Laser Materials Processing Conference. Luleå, Sweden : Luleå University of Technology, 2013. p. 47-58.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison of laser welding methods in position welding of edge joint of austenitic stainless steel

AU - Karhu, Miikka

AU - Kujanpää, Veli

AU - Pesari, Mikko

AU - Levesy, Bruno

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - An edge joint 2+2 mm thickness of ordinary austenitic stainless steel sheets was studied in all-position laser welding; flat (PA), vertical-up (PF), vertical-down (PG) and overhead (PE) positions. The penetration depth of the weld was aimed to be at minimum 3.0 mm. The optimal width of the weld was around 2 mm to guarantee adequate tolerances for the weld, but to avoid excessive melting of the edges of the sheets. In addition, the tolerance for the misalignment of the laser beam was tested. The welding procedure was tested with three laser welding methods, including de-focused laser beam, laser beam scanning and twin-spot laser beam welding in order to develop and find means to deploy laser welding robustly and reliably in practical applications. According to the results of welding test trials, the used configuration of twin-spot process seemed to be the most appropriate one among the tested welding methods to guarantee all position welding capability with constant suitable width and depth of weld penetration.

AB - An edge joint 2+2 mm thickness of ordinary austenitic stainless steel sheets was studied in all-position laser welding; flat (PA), vertical-up (PF), vertical-down (PG) and overhead (PE) positions. The penetration depth of the weld was aimed to be at minimum 3.0 mm. The optimal width of the weld was around 2 mm to guarantee adequate tolerances for the weld, but to avoid excessive melting of the edges of the sheets. In addition, the tolerance for the misalignment of the laser beam was tested. The welding procedure was tested with three laser welding methods, including de-focused laser beam, laser beam scanning and twin-spot laser beam welding in order to develop and find means to deploy laser welding robustly and reliably in practical applications. According to the results of welding test trials, the used configuration of twin-spot process seemed to be the most appropriate one among the tested welding methods to guarantee all position welding capability with constant suitable width and depth of weld penetration.

KW - twin-spot

KW - laser beam scanning

KW - positional welding

KW - edge joint

KW - austenitic stainless steel

M3 - Conference article in proceedings

SN - 978-91-7439-688-1

SP - 47

EP - 58

BT - Proceedings 14th NOLAMP Conference

PB - Luleå University of Technology

CY - Luleå, Sweden

ER -

Karhu M, Kujanpää V, Pesari M, Levesy B. Comparison of laser welding methods in position welding of edge joint of austenitic stainless steel. In Proceedings 14th NOLAMP Conference : The 14th Nordic Laser Materials Processing Conference. Luleå, Sweden: Luleå University of Technology. 2013. p. 47-58