Comparison of metals extractability from Al/Fe-based drinking water treatment residuals

Changhui Wang, Leilei Bai, Yuansheng Pei, Laura A. Wendling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recycling of drinking water treatment residuals (WTRs) as environment amendments has attracted substantial interest due to their productive reuse concomitant with waste minimization. In the present study, the extractability of metals within six Al/Fe-hydroxide-comprised WTRs collected throughout China was investigated using fractionation, in vitro digestion and the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP). The results suggested that the major components and structure of the WTRs investigated were similar. The WTRs were enriched in Al, Fe, Ca, and Mg, also contained varying quantities of As, Ba, Be, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, K, Mn, Mo, Na, Ni, Pb, Sr, V, and Zn, but Ag, Hg, Sb, and Se were not detected. Most of the metals within the WTRs were largely non-extractable using the European Community Bureau of Reference (BCR) procedure, but many metals exhibited high bioaccessibility based on in vitro digestion. However, the WTRs could be classified as non-hazardous according to the TCLP assessment method used by the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Further analysis showed the communication factor, which is calculated as the ratio of total extractable metal by BCR procedure to the total metal, for most metals in the six WTRs, was similar, whereas the factor for Ba, Mn, Sr, and Zn varied substantially. Moreover, metals in the WTRs investigated had different risk assessment code. In summary, recycling of WTRs is subject to regulation based on assessment of risk due to metals prior to practical application.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13528-13538
Number of pages11
JournalEnvironmental Science and Pollution Research
Volume21
Issue number23
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Nov 2014
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Water Purification
Water treatment
Potable water
Drinking Water
water treatment
Metals
metal
Recycling
digestion
Leaching
Toxicity
recycling
Digestion
leaching
toxicity
drinking water treatment
comparison
United States Environmental Protection Agency
assessment method
Environmental Protection Agency

Keywords

  • Bioaccessibility
  • Drinking water treatment residue
  • Fractionation
  • Metal
  • Risk
  • TCLP

Cite this

@article{d8f209d5156d46008edaacf53955d25d,
title = "Comparison of metals extractability from Al/Fe-based drinking water treatment residuals",
abstract = "Recycling of drinking water treatment residuals (WTRs) as environment amendments has attracted substantial interest due to their productive reuse concomitant with waste minimization. In the present study, the extractability of metals within six Al/Fe-hydroxide-comprised WTRs collected throughout China was investigated using fractionation, in vitro digestion and the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP). The results suggested that the major components and structure of the WTRs investigated were similar. The WTRs were enriched in Al, Fe, Ca, and Mg, also contained varying quantities of As, Ba, Be, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, K, Mn, Mo, Na, Ni, Pb, Sr, V, and Zn, but Ag, Hg, Sb, and Se were not detected. Most of the metals within the WTRs were largely non-extractable using the European Community Bureau of Reference (BCR) procedure, but many metals exhibited high bioaccessibility based on in vitro digestion. However, the WTRs could be classified as non-hazardous according to the TCLP assessment method used by the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Further analysis showed the communication factor, which is calculated as the ratio of total extractable metal by BCR procedure to the total metal, for most metals in the six WTRs, was similar, whereas the factor for Ba, Mn, Sr, and Zn varied substantially. Moreover, metals in the WTRs investigated had different risk assessment code. In summary, recycling of WTRs is subject to regulation based on assessment of risk due to metals prior to practical application.",
keywords = "Bioaccessibility, Drinking water treatment residue, Fractionation, Metal, Risk, TCLP",
author = "Changhui Wang and Leilei Bai and Yuansheng Pei and Wendling, {Laura A.}",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1007/s11356-014-3300-2",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "13528--13538",
journal = "Environmental Science and Pollution Research",
issn = "0944-1344",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "23",

}

Comparison of metals extractability from Al/Fe-based drinking water treatment residuals. / Wang, Changhui; Bai, Leilei; Pei, Yuansheng; Wendling, Laura A.

In: Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 21, No. 23, 15.11.2014, p. 13528-13538.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of metals extractability from Al/Fe-based drinking water treatment residuals

AU - Wang, Changhui

AU - Bai, Leilei

AU - Pei, Yuansheng

AU - Wendling, Laura A.

PY - 2014/11/15

Y1 - 2014/11/15

N2 - Recycling of drinking water treatment residuals (WTRs) as environment amendments has attracted substantial interest due to their productive reuse concomitant with waste minimization. In the present study, the extractability of metals within six Al/Fe-hydroxide-comprised WTRs collected throughout China was investigated using fractionation, in vitro digestion and the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP). The results suggested that the major components and structure of the WTRs investigated were similar. The WTRs were enriched in Al, Fe, Ca, and Mg, also contained varying quantities of As, Ba, Be, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, K, Mn, Mo, Na, Ni, Pb, Sr, V, and Zn, but Ag, Hg, Sb, and Se were not detected. Most of the metals within the WTRs were largely non-extractable using the European Community Bureau of Reference (BCR) procedure, but many metals exhibited high bioaccessibility based on in vitro digestion. However, the WTRs could be classified as non-hazardous according to the TCLP assessment method used by the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Further analysis showed the communication factor, which is calculated as the ratio of total extractable metal by BCR procedure to the total metal, for most metals in the six WTRs, was similar, whereas the factor for Ba, Mn, Sr, and Zn varied substantially. Moreover, metals in the WTRs investigated had different risk assessment code. In summary, recycling of WTRs is subject to regulation based on assessment of risk due to metals prior to practical application.

AB - Recycling of drinking water treatment residuals (WTRs) as environment amendments has attracted substantial interest due to their productive reuse concomitant with waste minimization. In the present study, the extractability of metals within six Al/Fe-hydroxide-comprised WTRs collected throughout China was investigated using fractionation, in vitro digestion and the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP). The results suggested that the major components and structure of the WTRs investigated were similar. The WTRs were enriched in Al, Fe, Ca, and Mg, also contained varying quantities of As, Ba, Be, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, K, Mn, Mo, Na, Ni, Pb, Sr, V, and Zn, but Ag, Hg, Sb, and Se were not detected. Most of the metals within the WTRs were largely non-extractable using the European Community Bureau of Reference (BCR) procedure, but many metals exhibited high bioaccessibility based on in vitro digestion. However, the WTRs could be classified as non-hazardous according to the TCLP assessment method used by the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Further analysis showed the communication factor, which is calculated as the ratio of total extractable metal by BCR procedure to the total metal, for most metals in the six WTRs, was similar, whereas the factor for Ba, Mn, Sr, and Zn varied substantially. Moreover, metals in the WTRs investigated had different risk assessment code. In summary, recycling of WTRs is subject to regulation based on assessment of risk due to metals prior to practical application.

KW - Bioaccessibility

KW - Drinking water treatment residue

KW - Fractionation

KW - Metal

KW - Risk

KW - TCLP

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84911391750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11356-014-3300-2

DO - 10.1007/s11356-014-3300-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 25023656

AN - SCOPUS:84911391750

VL - 21

SP - 13528

EP - 13538

JO - Environmental Science and Pollution Research

JF - Environmental Science and Pollution Research

SN - 0944-1344

IS - 23

ER -