Abstract
A comparison study was performed to evaluate the
applicability of optical and SAR data for land cover
classification for REDD+ services on a test site in
Chiapas State in Mexico. The accuracy of the maps was
assessed using an independent data set that was collected
from very high resolution optical data. The overall
accuracy of the maps varied between 79 % of ENVISAT ASAR
and 94 % of RapidEye for the forest - non-forest
classifications. The accuracies for the six IPCC
compliant classes were from 5 to 9 percentage units
lower. Results that were obtained with the optical data
were somewhat better than the results using SAR data.
However, the difference between the optical and SAR
results was fairly small when L-band SAR data were used.
L-band SAR data seem to be competitive alternative for
optical data particularly in the areas with frequent
cloud cover
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings of the ESA Living Planet Symposium 2013 |
Editors | Leny Ouwehand |
Place of Publication | Noordwijk |
Publisher | European Space Agency (ESA) |
Number of pages | 7 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-92-9221-286-5 |
Publication status | Published - 2013 |
MoE publication type | B3 Non-refereed article in conference proceedings |
Event | ESA Living Planet Symposium 2013 - Edinburgh, United Kingdom Duration: 9 Sept 2013 → 13 Sept 2013 Conference number: ESA SP-722 |
Conference
Conference | ESA Living Planet Symposium 2013 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | United Kingdom |
City | Edinburgh |
Period | 9/09/13 → 13/09/13 |
Keywords
- Remote sensing
- land cover
- classification
- REDD
- optical
- SAR