Comparison of optical and SAR data in tropical land cover classification for REDD+

Laura Sirro, Tuomas Häme, Yrjö Rauste, Oleg Antropov, Jarno Hämäläinen, Petri Latva-Käyrä, Fernando Paz, Bernardus de Jong

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientific

Abstract

A comparison study was performed to evaluate the applicability of optical and SAR data for land cover classification for REDD+ services on a test site in Chiapas State in Mexico. The accuracy of the maps was assessed using an independent data set that was collected from very high resolution optical data. The overall accuracy of the maps varied between 79 % of ENVISAT ASAR and 94 % of RapidEye for the forest - non-forest classifications. The accuracies for the six IPCC compliant classes were from 5 to 9 percentage units lower. Results that were obtained with the optical data were somewhat better than the results using SAR data. However, the difference between the optical and SAR results was fairly small when L-band SAR data were used. L-band SAR data seem to be competitive alternative for optical data particularly in the areas with frequent cloud cover
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the ESA Living Planet Symposium 2013
Place of PublicationNoordwijk
PublisherEuropean Space Agency ESA
Number of pages7
ISBN (Print)978-92-9221-286-5
Publication statusPublished - 2013
MoE publication typeB3 Non-refereed article in conference proceedings
EventESA Living Planet Symposium 2013 - Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Duration: 9 Sep 201313 Sep 2013
Conference number: ESA SP-722

Conference

ConferenceESA Living Planet Symposium 2013
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityEdinburgh
Period9/09/1313/09/13

Fingerprint

land cover
synthetic aperture radar
comparison
cloud cover

Keywords

  • Remote sensing
  • land cover
  • classification
  • REDD
  • optical
  • SAR

Cite this

Sirro, L., Häme, T., Rauste, Y., Antropov, O., Hämäläinen, J., Latva-Käyrä, P., ... de Jong, B. (2013). Comparison of optical and SAR data in tropical land cover classification for REDD+. In Proceedings of the ESA Living Planet Symposium 2013 Noordwijk: European Space Agency ESA.
Sirro, Laura ; Häme, Tuomas ; Rauste, Yrjö ; Antropov, Oleg ; Hämäläinen, Jarno ; Latva-Käyrä, Petri ; Paz, Fernando ; de Jong, Bernardus. / Comparison of optical and SAR data in tropical land cover classification for REDD+. Proceedings of the ESA Living Planet Symposium 2013. Noordwijk : European Space Agency ESA, 2013.
@inproceedings{33d558ce57294643bf6df71190faf235,
title = "Comparison of optical and SAR data in tropical land cover classification for REDD+",
abstract = "A comparison study was performed to evaluate the applicability of optical and SAR data for land cover classification for REDD+ services on a test site in Chiapas State in Mexico. The accuracy of the maps was assessed using an independent data set that was collected from very high resolution optical data. The overall accuracy of the maps varied between 79 {\%} of ENVISAT ASAR and 94 {\%} of RapidEye for the forest - non-forest classifications. The accuracies for the six IPCC compliant classes were from 5 to 9 percentage units lower. Results that were obtained with the optical data were somewhat better than the results using SAR data. However, the difference between the optical and SAR results was fairly small when L-band SAR data were used. L-band SAR data seem to be competitive alternative for optical data particularly in the areas with frequent cloud cover",
keywords = "Remote sensing, land cover, classification, REDD, optical, SAR",
author = "Laura Sirro and Tuomas H{\"a}me and Yrj{\"o} Rauste and Oleg Antropov and Jarno H{\"a}m{\"a}l{\"a}inen and Petri Latva-K{\"a}yr{\"a} and Fernando Paz and {de Jong}, Bernardus",
note = "CA2: TK802 Project code: 40736",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-92-9221-286-5",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the ESA Living Planet Symposium 2013",
publisher = "European Space Agency ESA",
address = "France",

}

Sirro, L, Häme, T, Rauste, Y, Antropov, O, Hämäläinen, J, Latva-Käyrä, P, Paz, F & de Jong, B 2013, Comparison of optical and SAR data in tropical land cover classification for REDD+. in Proceedings of the ESA Living Planet Symposium 2013. European Space Agency ESA, Noordwijk, ESA Living Planet Symposium 2013, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 9/09/13.

Comparison of optical and SAR data in tropical land cover classification for REDD+. / Sirro, Laura; Häme, Tuomas; Rauste, Yrjö; Antropov, Oleg; Hämäläinen, Jarno; Latva-Käyrä, Petri; Paz, Fernando; de Jong, Bernardus.

Proceedings of the ESA Living Planet Symposium 2013. Noordwijk : European Space Agency ESA, 2013.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientific

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison of optical and SAR data in tropical land cover classification for REDD+

AU - Sirro, Laura

AU - Häme, Tuomas

AU - Rauste, Yrjö

AU - Antropov, Oleg

AU - Hämäläinen, Jarno

AU - Latva-Käyrä, Petri

AU - Paz, Fernando

AU - de Jong, Bernardus

N1 - CA2: TK802 Project code: 40736

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - A comparison study was performed to evaluate the applicability of optical and SAR data for land cover classification for REDD+ services on a test site in Chiapas State in Mexico. The accuracy of the maps was assessed using an independent data set that was collected from very high resolution optical data. The overall accuracy of the maps varied between 79 % of ENVISAT ASAR and 94 % of RapidEye for the forest - non-forest classifications. The accuracies for the six IPCC compliant classes were from 5 to 9 percentage units lower. Results that were obtained with the optical data were somewhat better than the results using SAR data. However, the difference between the optical and SAR results was fairly small when L-band SAR data were used. L-band SAR data seem to be competitive alternative for optical data particularly in the areas with frequent cloud cover

AB - A comparison study was performed to evaluate the applicability of optical and SAR data for land cover classification for REDD+ services on a test site in Chiapas State in Mexico. The accuracy of the maps was assessed using an independent data set that was collected from very high resolution optical data. The overall accuracy of the maps varied between 79 % of ENVISAT ASAR and 94 % of RapidEye for the forest - non-forest classifications. The accuracies for the six IPCC compliant classes were from 5 to 9 percentage units lower. Results that were obtained with the optical data were somewhat better than the results using SAR data. However, the difference between the optical and SAR results was fairly small when L-band SAR data were used. L-band SAR data seem to be competitive alternative for optical data particularly in the areas with frequent cloud cover

KW - Remote sensing

KW - land cover

KW - classification

KW - REDD

KW - optical

KW - SAR

M3 - Conference article in proceedings

SN - 978-92-9221-286-5

BT - Proceedings of the ESA Living Planet Symposium 2013

PB - European Space Agency ESA

CY - Noordwijk

ER -

Sirro L, Häme T, Rauste Y, Antropov O, Hämäläinen J, Latva-Käyrä P et al. Comparison of optical and SAR data in tropical land cover classification for REDD+. In Proceedings of the ESA Living Planet Symposium 2013. Noordwijk: European Space Agency ESA. 2013