Comparison of SECNM's distributed and end-to-end QoS monitoring, regarding a TLS and an unsecured connection

Tomi Räty; Mikko Karinsalo; Tapio Heikkilä; Markus Sihvonen

doi:10.1109/ADCOM.2006.4289876

Comparison of SECNM's distributed and end-to-end QoS monitoring, regarding a TLS and an unsecured connection

Tomi Räty, Mikko Karinsalo, Tapio Heikkilä, Markus Sihvonen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference article in proceedings › Scientific › peer-review

Abstract

The monitoring structure implemented in this research paper is called SECNM (Single End-Client and Network Monitors). It comprises of a single QoS (Quality of Service) end-client monitor and a QoS network monitor. SECNM's network monitor performs as a QoS distributed monitor, and SECNM's end-client monitor as a QoS end-to-end monitor. SECNM combines these two monitor models. The strength of SECNM is immense when applied to the ensuing scenarios: 1) a plenary QoS end-to-end monitor cannot be applied and 2) a mere network monitor is not adequate. The structure of the SECNM environment was modeled on journals and conference papers regarding QoS monitoring, distributed monitoring, and end-to-end monitoring. A comparison of these theoretical paradigms and SECNM was performed. Test cases were conducted to discriminate the main differences between SECNM's monitor types in the M4MAMI system. The notable discrepancies includes indications of different delays and data quantities, lost data, retransmissions, and initial and final negotiation related to the TLS communication.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	2006 International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communications
Publisher	IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers
ISBN (Electronic)	1-4244-0716-8
ISBN (Print)	1-4244-0715-X
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/ADCOM.2006.4289876
Publication status	Published - 2006
MoE publication type	A4 Article in a conference publication
Event	14th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communications - Surathkal, India Duration: 20 Dec 2006 → 23 Dec 2006

Conference

Conference	14th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communications
Country/Territory	India
City	Surathkal
Period	20/12/06 → 23/12/06

Access to Document

10.1109/ADCOM.2006.4289876

Cite this

@inproceedings{641ffc65134e4073bfe9fa7c098b277d,

title = "Comparison of SECNM's distributed and end-to-end QoS monitoring, regarding a TLS and an unsecured connection",

abstract = "The monitoring structure implemented in this research paper is called SECNM (Single End-Client and Network Monitors). It comprises of a single QoS (Quality of Service) end-client monitor and a QoS network monitor. SECNM's network monitor performs as a QoS distributed monitor, and SECNM's end-client monitor as a QoS end-to-end monitor. SECNM combines these two monitor models. The strength of SECNM is immense when applied to the ensuing scenarios: 1) a plenary QoS end-to-end monitor cannot be applied and 2) a mere network monitor is not adequate. The structure of the SECNM environment was modeled on journals and conference papers regarding QoS monitoring, distributed monitoring, and end-to-end monitoring. A comparison of these theoretical paradigms and SECNM was performed. Test cases were conducted to discriminate the main differences between SECNM's monitor types in the M4MAMI system. The notable discrepancies includes indications of different delays and data quantities, lost data, retransmissions, and initial and final negotiation related to the TLS communication.",

author = "Tomi R{\"a}ty and Mikko Karinsalo and Tapio Heikkil{\"a} and Markus Sihvonen",

year = "2006",

doi = "10.1109/ADCOM.2006.4289876",

language = "English",

isbn = "1-4244-0715-X",

booktitle = "2006 International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communications",

publisher = "IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers",

address = "United States",

note = "14th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communications ; Conference date: 20-12-2006 Through 23-12-2006",

}

Räty, T, Karinsalo, M, Heikkilä, T & Sihvonen, M 2006, Comparison of SECNM's distributed and end-to-end QoS monitoring, regarding a TLS and an unsecured connection. in 2006 International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communications. IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, 14th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communications, Surathkal, India, 20/12/06. https://doi.org/10.1109/ADCOM.2006.4289876

Comparison of SECNM's distributed and end-to-end QoS monitoring, regarding a TLS and an unsecured connection. / Räty, Tomi; Karinsalo, Mikko; Heikkilä, Tapio et al.
2006 International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communications. IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, 2006.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference article in proceedings › Scientific › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison of SECNM's distributed and end-to-end QoS monitoring, regarding a TLS and an unsecured connection

AU - Räty, Tomi

AU - Karinsalo, Mikko

AU - Heikkilä, Tapio

AU - Sihvonen, Markus

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - The monitoring structure implemented in this research paper is called SECNM (Single End-Client and Network Monitors). It comprises of a single QoS (Quality of Service) end-client monitor and a QoS network monitor. SECNM's network monitor performs as a QoS distributed monitor, and SECNM's end-client monitor as a QoS end-to-end monitor. SECNM combines these two monitor models. The strength of SECNM is immense when applied to the ensuing scenarios: 1) a plenary QoS end-to-end monitor cannot be applied and 2) a mere network monitor is not adequate. The structure of the SECNM environment was modeled on journals and conference papers regarding QoS monitoring, distributed monitoring, and end-to-end monitoring. A comparison of these theoretical paradigms and SECNM was performed. Test cases were conducted to discriminate the main differences between SECNM's monitor types in the M4MAMI system. The notable discrepancies includes indications of different delays and data quantities, lost data, retransmissions, and initial and final negotiation related to the TLS communication.

AB - The monitoring structure implemented in this research paper is called SECNM (Single End-Client and Network Monitors). It comprises of a single QoS (Quality of Service) end-client monitor and a QoS network monitor. SECNM's network monitor performs as a QoS distributed monitor, and SECNM's end-client monitor as a QoS end-to-end monitor. SECNM combines these two monitor models. The strength of SECNM is immense when applied to the ensuing scenarios: 1) a plenary QoS end-to-end monitor cannot be applied and 2) a mere network monitor is not adequate. The structure of the SECNM environment was modeled on journals and conference papers regarding QoS monitoring, distributed monitoring, and end-to-end monitoring. A comparison of these theoretical paradigms and SECNM was performed. Test cases were conducted to discriminate the main differences between SECNM's monitor types in the M4MAMI system. The notable discrepancies includes indications of different delays and data quantities, lost data, retransmissions, and initial and final negotiation related to the TLS communication.

U2 - 10.1109/ADCOM.2006.4289876

DO - 10.1109/ADCOM.2006.4289876

M3 - Conference article in proceedings

SN - 1-4244-0715-X

BT - 2006 International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communications

PB - IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers

T2 - 14th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communications

Y2 - 20 December 2006 through 23 December 2006

ER -

Comparison of SECNM's distributed and end-to-end QoS monitoring, regarding a TLS and an unsecured connection

Abstract

Conference

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this