Conceptual design of inherently saferprocesses by genetic algorithms and case-based reasoning

Markku Hurme, Anna-Mari Heikkilä

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientific

    Abstract

    An approach for synthesis of inherently safer chemical processes is presented. Process synthesis can be considered as an optimization task. Since the synthesis model is uncontinuous, ordinary optimization methods cannot be used, but a genetic algorithm is employed instead. In the genetic algorithm the structure of the process is represented as a string of integers, which describes the operations required and how they are connected. An inherent safety index is used as an objective function (fitness) in the genetic algorithm. To evaluate the process structure subindex a database of existing good and bad designs was collected from design recommendations and accident reports. By this way the experience from earlier designs can be reused in process synthesis and the probability of making again the same design mistakes is decreased.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of PRES'99 
    Place of PublicationBudapest
    Pages341-346
    Publication statusPublished - 1999
    MoE publication typeB3 Non-refereed article in conference proceedings
    Event2nd Conference on Process Integration, Modelling and Optimisation
    for Energy Saving and Pollution Reduction, PRES'99
    - Budapest, Hungary
    Duration: 31 May 19992 Jun 1999

    Conference

    Conference2nd Conference on Process Integration, Modelling and Optimisation
    for Energy Saving and Pollution Reduction, PRES'99
    Abbreviated titlePRES
    Country/TerritoryHungary
    CityBudapest
    Period31/05/992/06/99

    Keywords

    • process synthesis
    • inherent safety
    • safety index
    • genetic algorithm
    • case-based reasoning

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Conceptual design of inherently saferprocesses by genetic algorithms and case-based reasoning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this