Connecting water footprint and water risk assessment

Case packaging board

Elina Saarivuori, Riitta Molarius, Helena Wessman-Jääskeläinen, Liisa Poussa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

A company can evaluate water impacts related to its activities with the help of water footprint (WF), allowing manufacturer to identify freshwater consumption and degradation hotspots along the value chain. However, WF does not directly consider the environmental or process related risks caused by water use. This study aims at providing a framework for more extensive and complementary water assessments by connecting two environmental tools, WF and water risk assessment. Product system of a packaging board is used as a case example. WF assessment is carried out in accordance with the ISO 14046 Standard. Risk analysis focuses on the WF hotspots by analysing the local environmental circumstances and the main risks, their likelihood and consequences. The results show that water stress indicator is sensitive to input and output water qualities. The significance of local environmental circumstances (potential for droughts and shallow water levels, upstream water storages) on the water-based risks are highlighted in the results. The use of complementary methods reveals opposing interests: the lowest WF results of the studied scenarios include a risk for poor product quality. The results offer valuable information to a manufacturer on self-inflicted water impact and the role of indirect water use, helping to integrate water risk approach in the strategic planning.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)229-241
JournalWater Practice and Technology
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

water footprint
risk assessment
water
water use
water storage
water stress
packaging
water level
shallow water
drought
water quality
degradation

Keywords

  • freshwater use
  • production plant
  • risk assessment
  • water footprint
  • water impact

Cite this

Saarivuori, Elina ; Molarius, Riitta ; Wessman-Jääskeläinen, Helena ; Poussa, Liisa. / Connecting water footprint and water risk assessment : Case packaging board. In: Water Practice and Technology. 2015 ; Vol. 10, No. 2. pp. 229-241.
@article{f1baf55179fb4a0987240f5fa4f160aa,
title = "Connecting water footprint and water risk assessment: Case packaging board",
abstract = "A company can evaluate water impacts related to its activities with the help of water footprint (WF), allowing manufacturer to identify freshwater consumption and degradation hotspots along the value chain. However, WF does not directly consider the environmental or process related risks caused by water use. This study aims at providing a framework for more extensive and complementary water assessments by connecting two environmental tools, WF and water risk assessment. Product system of a packaging board is used as a case example. WF assessment is carried out in accordance with the ISO 14046 Standard. Risk analysis focuses on the WF hotspots by analysing the local environmental circumstances and the main risks, their likelihood and consequences. The results show that water stress indicator is sensitive to input and output water qualities. The significance of local environmental circumstances (potential for droughts and shallow water levels, upstream water storages) on the water-based risks are highlighted in the results. The use of complementary methods reveals opposing interests: the lowest WF results of the studied scenarios include a risk for poor product quality. The results offer valuable information to a manufacturer on self-inflicted water impact and the role of indirect water use, helping to integrate water risk approach in the strategic planning.",
keywords = "freshwater use, production plant, risk assessment, water footprint, water impact",
author = "Elina Saarivuori and Riitta Molarius and Helena Wessman-J{\"a}{\"a}skel{\"a}inen and Liisa Poussa",
note = "Project code: 83872",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.2166/wpt.2015.025",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "229--241",
journal = "Water Practice and Technology",
issn = "1751-231X",
publisher = "IWA Publishing",
number = "2",

}

Connecting water footprint and water risk assessment : Case packaging board. / Saarivuori, Elina; Molarius, Riitta; Wessman-Jääskeläinen, Helena; Poussa, Liisa.

In: Water Practice and Technology, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2015, p. 229-241.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Connecting water footprint and water risk assessment

T2 - Case packaging board

AU - Saarivuori, Elina

AU - Molarius, Riitta

AU - Wessman-Jääskeläinen, Helena

AU - Poussa, Liisa

N1 - Project code: 83872

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - A company can evaluate water impacts related to its activities with the help of water footprint (WF), allowing manufacturer to identify freshwater consumption and degradation hotspots along the value chain. However, WF does not directly consider the environmental or process related risks caused by water use. This study aims at providing a framework for more extensive and complementary water assessments by connecting two environmental tools, WF and water risk assessment. Product system of a packaging board is used as a case example. WF assessment is carried out in accordance with the ISO 14046 Standard. Risk analysis focuses on the WF hotspots by analysing the local environmental circumstances and the main risks, their likelihood and consequences. The results show that water stress indicator is sensitive to input and output water qualities. The significance of local environmental circumstances (potential for droughts and shallow water levels, upstream water storages) on the water-based risks are highlighted in the results. The use of complementary methods reveals opposing interests: the lowest WF results of the studied scenarios include a risk for poor product quality. The results offer valuable information to a manufacturer on self-inflicted water impact and the role of indirect water use, helping to integrate water risk approach in the strategic planning.

AB - A company can evaluate water impacts related to its activities with the help of water footprint (WF), allowing manufacturer to identify freshwater consumption and degradation hotspots along the value chain. However, WF does not directly consider the environmental or process related risks caused by water use. This study aims at providing a framework for more extensive and complementary water assessments by connecting two environmental tools, WF and water risk assessment. Product system of a packaging board is used as a case example. WF assessment is carried out in accordance with the ISO 14046 Standard. Risk analysis focuses on the WF hotspots by analysing the local environmental circumstances and the main risks, their likelihood and consequences. The results show that water stress indicator is sensitive to input and output water qualities. The significance of local environmental circumstances (potential for droughts and shallow water levels, upstream water storages) on the water-based risks are highlighted in the results. The use of complementary methods reveals opposing interests: the lowest WF results of the studied scenarios include a risk for poor product quality. The results offer valuable information to a manufacturer on self-inflicted water impact and the role of indirect water use, helping to integrate water risk approach in the strategic planning.

KW - freshwater use

KW - production plant

KW - risk assessment

KW - water footprint

KW - water impact

U2 - 10.2166/wpt.2015.025

DO - 10.2166/wpt.2015.025

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 229

EP - 241

JO - Water Practice and Technology

JF - Water Practice and Technology

SN - 1751-231X

IS - 2

ER -