Connecting water footprint and water risk assessment: Case packaging board

Elina Saarivuori, Riitta Molarius, Helena Wessman-Jääskeläinen, Liisa Poussa

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    A company can evaluate water impacts related to its activities with the help of water footprint (WF), allowing manufacturer to identify freshwater consumption and degradation hotspots along the value chain. However, WF does not directly consider the environmental or process related risks caused by water use. This study aims at providing a framework for more extensive and complementary water assessments by connecting two environmental tools, WF and water risk assessment. Product system of a packaging board is used as a case example. WF assessment is carried out in accordance with the ISO 14046 Standard. Risk analysis focuses on the WF hotspots by analysing the local environmental circumstances and the main risks, their likelihood and consequences. The results show that water stress indicator is sensitive to input and output water qualities. The significance of local environmental circumstances (potential for droughts and shallow water levels, upstream water storages) on the water-based risks are highlighted in the results. The use of complementary methods reveals opposing interests: the lowest WF results of the studied scenarios include a risk for poor product quality. The results offer valuable information to a manufacturer on self-inflicted water impact and the role of indirect water use, helping to integrate water risk approach in the strategic planning.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)229-241
    JournalWater Practice and Technology
    Volume10
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Fingerprint

    water footprint
    risk assessment
    water
    water use
    water storage
    water stress
    packaging
    water level
    shallow water
    drought
    water quality
    degradation

    Keywords

    • freshwater use
    • production plant
    • risk assessment
    • water footprint
    • water impact

    Cite this

    Saarivuori, Elina ; Molarius, Riitta ; Wessman-Jääskeläinen, Helena ; Poussa, Liisa. / Connecting water footprint and water risk assessment : Case packaging board. In: Water Practice and Technology. 2015 ; Vol. 10, No. 2. pp. 229-241.
    @article{f1baf55179fb4a0987240f5fa4f160aa,
    title = "Connecting water footprint and water risk assessment: Case packaging board",
    abstract = "A company can evaluate water impacts related to its activities with the help of water footprint (WF), allowing manufacturer to identify freshwater consumption and degradation hotspots along the value chain. However, WF does not directly consider the environmental or process related risks caused by water use. This study aims at providing a framework for more extensive and complementary water assessments by connecting two environmental tools, WF and water risk assessment. Product system of a packaging board is used as a case example. WF assessment is carried out in accordance with the ISO 14046 Standard. Risk analysis focuses on the WF hotspots by analysing the local environmental circumstances and the main risks, their likelihood and consequences. The results show that water stress indicator is sensitive to input and output water qualities. The significance of local environmental circumstances (potential for droughts and shallow water levels, upstream water storages) on the water-based risks are highlighted in the results. The use of complementary methods reveals opposing interests: the lowest WF results of the studied scenarios include a risk for poor product quality. The results offer valuable information to a manufacturer on self-inflicted water impact and the role of indirect water use, helping to integrate water risk approach in the strategic planning.",
    keywords = "freshwater use, production plant, risk assessment, water footprint, water impact",
    author = "Elina Saarivuori and Riitta Molarius and Helena Wessman-J{\"a}{\"a}skel{\"a}inen and Liisa Poussa",
    note = "Project code: 83872",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.2166/wpt.2015.025",
    language = "English",
    volume = "10",
    pages = "229--241",
    journal = "Water Practice and Technology",
    issn = "1751-231X",
    publisher = "IWA Publishing",
    number = "2",

    }

    Connecting water footprint and water risk assessment : Case packaging board. / Saarivuori, Elina; Molarius, Riitta; Wessman-Jääskeläinen, Helena; Poussa, Liisa.

    In: Water Practice and Technology, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2015, p. 229-241.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Connecting water footprint and water risk assessment

    T2 - Case packaging board

    AU - Saarivuori, Elina

    AU - Molarius, Riitta

    AU - Wessman-Jääskeläinen, Helena

    AU - Poussa, Liisa

    N1 - Project code: 83872

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - A company can evaluate water impacts related to its activities with the help of water footprint (WF), allowing manufacturer to identify freshwater consumption and degradation hotspots along the value chain. However, WF does not directly consider the environmental or process related risks caused by water use. This study aims at providing a framework for more extensive and complementary water assessments by connecting two environmental tools, WF and water risk assessment. Product system of a packaging board is used as a case example. WF assessment is carried out in accordance with the ISO 14046 Standard. Risk analysis focuses on the WF hotspots by analysing the local environmental circumstances and the main risks, their likelihood and consequences. The results show that water stress indicator is sensitive to input and output water qualities. The significance of local environmental circumstances (potential for droughts and shallow water levels, upstream water storages) on the water-based risks are highlighted in the results. The use of complementary methods reveals opposing interests: the lowest WF results of the studied scenarios include a risk for poor product quality. The results offer valuable information to a manufacturer on self-inflicted water impact and the role of indirect water use, helping to integrate water risk approach in the strategic planning.

    AB - A company can evaluate water impacts related to its activities with the help of water footprint (WF), allowing manufacturer to identify freshwater consumption and degradation hotspots along the value chain. However, WF does not directly consider the environmental or process related risks caused by water use. This study aims at providing a framework for more extensive and complementary water assessments by connecting two environmental tools, WF and water risk assessment. Product system of a packaging board is used as a case example. WF assessment is carried out in accordance with the ISO 14046 Standard. Risk analysis focuses on the WF hotspots by analysing the local environmental circumstances and the main risks, their likelihood and consequences. The results show that water stress indicator is sensitive to input and output water qualities. The significance of local environmental circumstances (potential for droughts and shallow water levels, upstream water storages) on the water-based risks are highlighted in the results. The use of complementary methods reveals opposing interests: the lowest WF results of the studied scenarios include a risk for poor product quality. The results offer valuable information to a manufacturer on self-inflicted water impact and the role of indirect water use, helping to integrate water risk approach in the strategic planning.

    KW - freshwater use

    KW - production plant

    KW - risk assessment

    KW - water footprint

    KW - water impact

    U2 - 10.2166/wpt.2015.025

    DO - 10.2166/wpt.2015.025

    M3 - Article

    VL - 10

    SP - 229

    EP - 241

    JO - Water Practice and Technology

    JF - Water Practice and Technology

    SN - 1751-231X

    IS - 2

    ER -