Construction and demolition waste as a raw material for wood polymer composites: Assessment of environmental impacts

Miia Liikanen (Corresponding Author), Kaisa Grönman, Ivan Deviatkin, Jouni Havukainen, Marko Hyvärinen, Timo Kärki, Juha Varis, Risto Soukka, Mika Horttanainen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The European Commission's ambitious construction and demolition waste (CDW) material recovery target has placed pressure on Finland to increase its CDW material recovery rate. It has been identified that using CDW fractions, e.g. waste wood, plastic, mineral wool and plasterboard, as raw materials for wood polymer composites (WPCs) may help in reaching the CDW material recovery target. The objectives of this study were to assess the environmental impacts of WPC production using specific CDW fractions, namely wood, plastic, plasterboard and mineral wool, as raw materials, and to compare these impacts with the baseline situation where these CDW fractions are treated with conventional waste treatment methods such as landfilling and incineration. The study focused primarily on the depletion of fossil hydrocarbons and climate change. The results indicate that, when compared to the baseline situation, the environmental impacts of CDW management can be decreased when CDW fractions are used in WPC production. By substituting WPCs for plastic or aluminium, considerable environmental benefits can be achieved in terms of the aforementioned impact categories. Due to the differences in the physical and mechanical properties of WPCs compared to plastic and aluminium, WPCs cannot necessarily substitute them in a mass-based ratio of 1:1. This was acknowledged in the study by identifying minimum substitution rates for different materials. For instance, the produced WPCs should substitute at least 6% of plastic and 8% of aluminium in order to decrease the impact on climate change compared to the advanced waste management scenario. Therefore, in applications where WPCs can be used as a substitute for these materials, WPC product design and development should be prioritised.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)716-727
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Cleaner Production
Volume225
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Jul 2019
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Demolition
Environmental impact
Wood
Raw materials
environmental impact
polymer
Composite materials
Polymers
plastic
Plastics
Mineral wool
aluminum
wool
Waste management
Aluminum
Recovery
Climate change
waste management
demolition waste
raw material

Keywords

  • Construction and demolition waste
  • Environmental impact assessment
  • Life cycle assessment
  • Material recovery
  • Waste-derived composite
  • Wood polymer composite

Cite this

Liikanen, M., Grönman, K., Deviatkin, I., Havukainen, J., Hyvärinen, M., Kärki, T., ... Horttanainen, M. (2019). Construction and demolition waste as a raw material for wood polymer composites: Assessment of environmental impacts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 225, 716-727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.348
Liikanen, Miia ; Grönman, Kaisa ; Deviatkin, Ivan ; Havukainen, Jouni ; Hyvärinen, Marko ; Kärki, Timo ; Varis, Juha ; Soukka, Risto ; Horttanainen, Mika. / Construction and demolition waste as a raw material for wood polymer composites : Assessment of environmental impacts. In: Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019 ; Vol. 225. pp. 716-727.
@article{00a6d193997348fca5ba03f8b1d9d1ca,
title = "Construction and demolition waste as a raw material for wood polymer composites: Assessment of environmental impacts",
abstract = "The European Commission's ambitious construction and demolition waste (CDW) material recovery target has placed pressure on Finland to increase its CDW material recovery rate. It has been identified that using CDW fractions, e.g. waste wood, plastic, mineral wool and plasterboard, as raw materials for wood polymer composites (WPCs) may help in reaching the CDW material recovery target. The objectives of this study were to assess the environmental impacts of WPC production using specific CDW fractions, namely wood, plastic, plasterboard and mineral wool, as raw materials, and to compare these impacts with the baseline situation where these CDW fractions are treated with conventional waste treatment methods such as landfilling and incineration. The study focused primarily on the depletion of fossil hydrocarbons and climate change. The results indicate that, when compared to the baseline situation, the environmental impacts of CDW management can be decreased when CDW fractions are used in WPC production. By substituting WPCs for plastic or aluminium, considerable environmental benefits can be achieved in terms of the aforementioned impact categories. Due to the differences in the physical and mechanical properties of WPCs compared to plastic and aluminium, WPCs cannot necessarily substitute them in a mass-based ratio of 1:1. This was acknowledged in the study by identifying minimum substitution rates for different materials. For instance, the produced WPCs should substitute at least 6{\%} of plastic and 8{\%} of aluminium in order to decrease the impact on climate change compared to the advanced waste management scenario. Therefore, in applications where WPCs can be used as a substitute for these materials, WPC product design and development should be prioritised.",
keywords = "Construction and demolition waste, Environmental impact assessment, Life cycle assessment, Material recovery, Waste-derived composite, Wood polymer composite",
author = "Miia Liikanen and Kaisa Gr{\"o}nman and Ivan Deviatkin and Jouni Havukainen and Marko Hyv{\"a}rinen and Timo K{\"a}rki and Juha Varis and Risto Soukka and Mika Horttanainen",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.348",
language = "English",
volume = "225",
pages = "716--727",
journal = "Journal of Cleaner Production",
issn = "0959-6526",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Liikanen, M, Grönman, K, Deviatkin, I, Havukainen, J, Hyvärinen, M, Kärki, T, Varis, J, Soukka, R & Horttanainen, M 2019, 'Construction and demolition waste as a raw material for wood polymer composites: Assessment of environmental impacts', Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 225, pp. 716-727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.348

Construction and demolition waste as a raw material for wood polymer composites : Assessment of environmental impacts. / Liikanen, Miia (Corresponding Author); Grönman, Kaisa; Deviatkin, Ivan; Havukainen, Jouni; Hyvärinen, Marko; Kärki, Timo; Varis, Juha; Soukka, Risto; Horttanainen, Mika.

In: Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 225, 10.07.2019, p. 716-727.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Construction and demolition waste as a raw material for wood polymer composites

T2 - Assessment of environmental impacts

AU - Liikanen, Miia

AU - Grönman, Kaisa

AU - Deviatkin, Ivan

AU - Havukainen, Jouni

AU - Hyvärinen, Marko

AU - Kärki, Timo

AU - Varis, Juha

AU - Soukka, Risto

AU - Horttanainen, Mika

PY - 2019/7/10

Y1 - 2019/7/10

N2 - The European Commission's ambitious construction and demolition waste (CDW) material recovery target has placed pressure on Finland to increase its CDW material recovery rate. It has been identified that using CDW fractions, e.g. waste wood, plastic, mineral wool and plasterboard, as raw materials for wood polymer composites (WPCs) may help in reaching the CDW material recovery target. The objectives of this study were to assess the environmental impacts of WPC production using specific CDW fractions, namely wood, plastic, plasterboard and mineral wool, as raw materials, and to compare these impacts with the baseline situation where these CDW fractions are treated with conventional waste treatment methods such as landfilling and incineration. The study focused primarily on the depletion of fossil hydrocarbons and climate change. The results indicate that, when compared to the baseline situation, the environmental impacts of CDW management can be decreased when CDW fractions are used in WPC production. By substituting WPCs for plastic or aluminium, considerable environmental benefits can be achieved in terms of the aforementioned impact categories. Due to the differences in the physical and mechanical properties of WPCs compared to plastic and aluminium, WPCs cannot necessarily substitute them in a mass-based ratio of 1:1. This was acknowledged in the study by identifying minimum substitution rates for different materials. For instance, the produced WPCs should substitute at least 6% of plastic and 8% of aluminium in order to decrease the impact on climate change compared to the advanced waste management scenario. Therefore, in applications where WPCs can be used as a substitute for these materials, WPC product design and development should be prioritised.

AB - The European Commission's ambitious construction and demolition waste (CDW) material recovery target has placed pressure on Finland to increase its CDW material recovery rate. It has been identified that using CDW fractions, e.g. waste wood, plastic, mineral wool and plasterboard, as raw materials for wood polymer composites (WPCs) may help in reaching the CDW material recovery target. The objectives of this study were to assess the environmental impacts of WPC production using specific CDW fractions, namely wood, plastic, plasterboard and mineral wool, as raw materials, and to compare these impacts with the baseline situation where these CDW fractions are treated with conventional waste treatment methods such as landfilling and incineration. The study focused primarily on the depletion of fossil hydrocarbons and climate change. The results indicate that, when compared to the baseline situation, the environmental impacts of CDW management can be decreased when CDW fractions are used in WPC production. By substituting WPCs for plastic or aluminium, considerable environmental benefits can be achieved in terms of the aforementioned impact categories. Due to the differences in the physical and mechanical properties of WPCs compared to plastic and aluminium, WPCs cannot necessarily substitute them in a mass-based ratio of 1:1. This was acknowledged in the study by identifying minimum substitution rates for different materials. For instance, the produced WPCs should substitute at least 6% of plastic and 8% of aluminium in order to decrease the impact on climate change compared to the advanced waste management scenario. Therefore, in applications where WPCs can be used as a substitute for these materials, WPC product design and development should be prioritised.

KW - Construction and demolition waste

KW - Environmental impact assessment

KW - Life cycle assessment

KW - Material recovery

KW - Waste-derived composite

KW - Wood polymer composite

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064011273&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.348

DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.348

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85064011273

VL - 225

SP - 716

EP - 727

JO - Journal of Cleaner Production

JF - Journal of Cleaner Production

SN - 0959-6526

ER -