Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Sort by
INIS
comparative evaluations
100%
hydrogen
100%
cracking
100%
universities
100%
japan
100%
welding
100%
avoidance
100%
levels
58%
energy
58%
steels
41%
geometry
33%
values
25%
safety
16%
increasing
16%
range
16%
plates
16%
welds
16%
hardness
8%
risks
8%
finland
8%
thickness
8%
sensitivity
8%
removal
8%
impurities
8%
variations
8%
preheating
8%
electrodes
8%
carbon steels
8%
fabrication
8%
symmetry
8%
cracks
8%
temperature range 0273-0400 k
8%
crack propagation
8%
restraints
8%
international cooperation
8%
haz
8%
Keyphrases
Japan
100%
Hydrogen Cracking
100%
Welding Procedure
100%
Method Comparison
100%
Osaka
100%
Arc Energy
58%
Joint Geometry
33%
Hydrogen Level
25%
Field Parameters
25%
Fillet
16%
Welding Condition
16%
Finland
8%
Order of Magnitude
8%
Technical Research
8%
Safety Factor
8%
Room Temperature
8%
Crack Initiation
8%
Butt Joint
8%
Requirement Set
8%
International Cooperation
8%
Crack Controlling
8%
Cracking Risk
8%
Controlling Factors
8%
Hydrogen Diffusion
8%
Energy Value
8%
Impurity Content
8%
Variation Range
8%
Stress Field
8%
Microgroove
8%
Plate Thickness
8%
Geometric Factor
8%
Joint Type
8%
Welding Thermal Cycle
8%
Crack Parameters
8%
Fillet Weld
8%
Practical Range
8%
Hydrogen Electrode
8%
C-Mn Steel
8%
Low Carbon Steel
8%
Double V
8%
Hydrogen Removal
8%
TMCP Steel
8%
HAZ Toughness
8%
Thick Plate
8%
Initiation Area
8%
Steel Composition
8%
Electrode Removal
8%
Engineering
Japan
100%
Arc Energy
58%
Joints (Structural Components)
41%
Hydrogen Level
25%
Applicability
8%
Test Result
8%
Technical Research Centre
8%
Safety Factor
8%
Mild Steel
8%
Impurity Content
8%
Welds
8%
Fillet Weld
8%
Mn Steel
8%
Diffusible Hydrogen
8%
Hydrogen Electrode
8%
Thermal Cycle
8%
Steel Composition
8%
Plate Thickness
8%
Crack Initiation
8%
Stress Field
8%
Room Temperature
8%
Butt Joint
8%
Thick Plate
8%
Calorific Value
8%