Coordinating collaboration in contractually different complex construction projects

Rita Lavikka, Riitta Smeds, Miia Jaatinen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose
The paper aims to compare the coordination of supply chain networks in contractually different complex construction projects.

Design/methodology/approach
A comparative case study of the coordination of collaborative work in two successful hospital construction projects was conducted. One of the projects applied multiple dyadic contracts, whereas the other project applied one multi-party contract between the parties. The projects were located in the USA. Data were collected by observing the coordination on the construction sites for six weeks and by conducting 72 interviews.

Findings
The paper shows that depending on the contract type, the timing and extent of complementary procedural coordination differs during projects. Compared with one multi-party contract, the dyadic contracts needed to be complemented during the design phase with three additional procedural coordination mechanisms: organizational design, processes for collaborative work and integrated concurrent engineering sessions. Additionally, common rules of conduct were taken into use during the construction phase. However, regardless of the contract type, procedural coordination mechanisms, such as co-located working, collaborative decision-making in inter-organizational meetings, a liaison role and shared project goals were needed throughout the projects.

Practical implications
If multiple dyadic contracts are applied, procedural coordination mechanisms have to be co-created by all supply chain parties at the beginning of the project.

Originality/value
The paper provides an understanding on successful contractual and complementary procedural coordination mechanisms of supply chain networks in complex construction projects.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)205-217
Number of pages13
JournalSupply Chain Management
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Construction project
Coordination mechanism
Supply chain network
Collaborative work
Supply chain
Comparative case study
Construction sites
Organizational design
Integrated
Design methodology
Design process
Concurrent engineering
Collaborative decision making

Keywords

  • Coordination
  • Collaboration
  • Comparative case study
  • Construction supply chain
  • Dyadic contract
  • Multi-party contract

Cite this

Lavikka, Rita ; Smeds, Riitta ; Jaatinen, Miia. / Coordinating collaboration in contractually different complex construction projects. In: Supply Chain Management. 2015 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 205-217.
@article{4c4f7973a1814ce49feca03bf906904e,
title = "Coordinating collaboration in contractually different complex construction projects",
abstract = "PurposeThe paper aims to compare the coordination of supply chain networks in contractually different complex construction projects.Design/methodology/approachA comparative case study of the coordination of collaborative work in two successful hospital construction projects was conducted. One of the projects applied multiple dyadic contracts, whereas the other project applied one multi-party contract between the parties. The projects were located in the USA. Data were collected by observing the coordination on the construction sites for six weeks and by conducting 72 interviews.FindingsThe paper shows that depending on the contract type, the timing and extent of complementary procedural coordination differs during projects. Compared with one multi-party contract, the dyadic contracts needed to be complemented during the design phase with three additional procedural coordination mechanisms: organizational design, processes for collaborative work and integrated concurrent engineering sessions. Additionally, common rules of conduct were taken into use during the construction phase. However, regardless of the contract type, procedural coordination mechanisms, such as co-located working, collaborative decision-making in inter-organizational meetings, a liaison role and shared project goals were needed throughout the projects.Practical implicationsIf multiple dyadic contracts are applied, procedural coordination mechanisms have to be co-created by all supply chain parties at the beginning of the project.Originality/valueThe paper provides an understanding on successful contractual and complementary procedural coordination mechanisms of supply chain networks in complex construction projects.",
keywords = "Coordination, Collaboration, Comparative case study, Construction supply chain, Dyadic contract, Multi-party contract",
author = "Rita Lavikka and Riitta Smeds and Miia Jaatinen",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1108/SCM-10-2014-0331",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "205--217",
journal = "Supply Chain Management",
issn = "1359-8546",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "2",

}

Coordinating collaboration in contractually different complex construction projects. / Lavikka, Rita; Smeds, Riitta; Jaatinen, Miia.

In: Supply Chain Management, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2015, p. 205-217.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coordinating collaboration in contractually different complex construction projects

AU - Lavikka, Rita

AU - Smeds, Riitta

AU - Jaatinen, Miia

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - PurposeThe paper aims to compare the coordination of supply chain networks in contractually different complex construction projects.Design/methodology/approachA comparative case study of the coordination of collaborative work in two successful hospital construction projects was conducted. One of the projects applied multiple dyadic contracts, whereas the other project applied one multi-party contract between the parties. The projects were located in the USA. Data were collected by observing the coordination on the construction sites for six weeks and by conducting 72 interviews.FindingsThe paper shows that depending on the contract type, the timing and extent of complementary procedural coordination differs during projects. Compared with one multi-party contract, the dyadic contracts needed to be complemented during the design phase with three additional procedural coordination mechanisms: organizational design, processes for collaborative work and integrated concurrent engineering sessions. Additionally, common rules of conduct were taken into use during the construction phase. However, regardless of the contract type, procedural coordination mechanisms, such as co-located working, collaborative decision-making in inter-organizational meetings, a liaison role and shared project goals were needed throughout the projects.Practical implicationsIf multiple dyadic contracts are applied, procedural coordination mechanisms have to be co-created by all supply chain parties at the beginning of the project.Originality/valueThe paper provides an understanding on successful contractual and complementary procedural coordination mechanisms of supply chain networks in complex construction projects.

AB - PurposeThe paper aims to compare the coordination of supply chain networks in contractually different complex construction projects.Design/methodology/approachA comparative case study of the coordination of collaborative work in two successful hospital construction projects was conducted. One of the projects applied multiple dyadic contracts, whereas the other project applied one multi-party contract between the parties. The projects were located in the USA. Data were collected by observing the coordination on the construction sites for six weeks and by conducting 72 interviews.FindingsThe paper shows that depending on the contract type, the timing and extent of complementary procedural coordination differs during projects. Compared with one multi-party contract, the dyadic contracts needed to be complemented during the design phase with three additional procedural coordination mechanisms: organizational design, processes for collaborative work and integrated concurrent engineering sessions. Additionally, common rules of conduct were taken into use during the construction phase. However, regardless of the contract type, procedural coordination mechanisms, such as co-located working, collaborative decision-making in inter-organizational meetings, a liaison role and shared project goals were needed throughout the projects.Practical implicationsIf multiple dyadic contracts are applied, procedural coordination mechanisms have to be co-created by all supply chain parties at the beginning of the project.Originality/valueThe paper provides an understanding on successful contractual and complementary procedural coordination mechanisms of supply chain networks in complex construction projects.

KW - Coordination

KW - Collaboration

KW - Comparative case study

KW - Construction supply chain

KW - Dyadic contract

KW - Multi-party contract

U2 - 10.1108/SCM-10-2014-0331

DO - 10.1108/SCM-10-2014-0331

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 205

EP - 217

JO - Supply Chain Management

JF - Supply Chain Management

SN - 1359-8546

IS - 2

ER -