Corporate managers' perceptions of safety and its value: An interview study of five internationally operating finnish companies

N. Nenonen, P. Hämäläinen, J. Heikkilä, T. Reiman, S. Tappura

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    A manager's active role is generally considered to be essential for successfully managing and improving safety. For example, managers are in the position to make safety-related decisions. To be able to make decisions, managers need to have a sufficient understanding of safety-related issues, such as the economic aspects of safety, the significance of which has recently increased. In order to support managers' safety-related responsibilities, it is important to understand their perceptions of safety. This paper discusses how corporate managers value safety and perceive the role of the economic aspects and evaluations of safety. Moreover, corporate managers' views on safety are discussed in relation to different economic situations. Twenty-three management representatives from five large-scale industrial Finnish companies were interviewed. The interviewed managers saw safety as an essential part of company operations and they mentioned many ways that business and economic factors affected safety. Nevertheless, they approached safety largely from the traditional viewpoint of the reactive measurement of accidents and costs, and as an ethical principle, instead of seeing safety as part of doing business. One can question whether safety is included sufficiently in decision-making if it is only approached as a value in itself, and whether the situation would be different if managers had more and better tools to model the economic aspects of safety. Economic evaluations could be useful, particularly in times of austerity when resources are scarce. At the same time, the benefits and limitations of the tools for modelling economic aspects of safety need to be considered.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)3-15
    JournalPolicy and Practice in Health and Safety
    Volume13
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Fingerprint

    Managers
    Interviews
    manager
    Safety
    interview
    Values
    Industry
    economics
    Economics
    economic situation
    evaluation
    economic factors
    Cost-Benefit Analysis
    accident
    Economic Models
    decision making
    responsibility
    costs
    management
    resources

    Keywords

    • economic evalutation
    • managers
    • OH&S
    • safety management
    • top management
    • value of safety

    Cite this

    @article{e0af91d169a94134a859ad95feda60ec,
    title = "Corporate managers' perceptions of safety and its value: An interview study of five internationally operating finnish companies",
    abstract = "A manager's active role is generally considered to be essential for successfully managing and improving safety. For example, managers are in the position to make safety-related decisions. To be able to make decisions, managers need to have a sufficient understanding of safety-related issues, such as the economic aspects of safety, the significance of which has recently increased. In order to support managers' safety-related responsibilities, it is important to understand their perceptions of safety. This paper discusses how corporate managers value safety and perceive the role of the economic aspects and evaluations of safety. Moreover, corporate managers' views on safety are discussed in relation to different economic situations. Twenty-three management representatives from five large-scale industrial Finnish companies were interviewed. The interviewed managers saw safety as an essential part of company operations and they mentioned many ways that business and economic factors affected safety. Nevertheless, they approached safety largely from the traditional viewpoint of the reactive measurement of accidents and costs, and as an ethical principle, instead of seeing safety as part of doing business. One can question whether safety is included sufficiently in decision-making if it is only approached as a value in itself, and whether the situation would be different if managers had more and better tools to model the economic aspects of safety. Economic evaluations could be useful, particularly in times of austerity when resources are scarce. At the same time, the benefits and limitations of the tools for modelling economic aspects of safety need to be considered.",
    keywords = "economic evalutation, managers, OH&S, safety management, top management, value of safety",
    author = "N. Nenonen and P. H{\"a}m{\"a}l{\"a}inen and J. Heikkil{\"a} and T. Reiman and S. Tappura",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1080/14774003.2015.11667808",
    language = "English",
    volume = "13",
    pages = "3--15",
    journal = "Policy and Practice in Health and Safety",
    issn = "1477-3996",
    number = "1",

    }

    Corporate managers' perceptions of safety and its value : An interview study of five internationally operating finnish companies. / Nenonen, N.; Hämäläinen, P.; Heikkilä, J.; Reiman, T.; Tappura, S.

    In: Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2015, p. 3-15.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Corporate managers' perceptions of safety and its value

    T2 - An interview study of five internationally operating finnish companies

    AU - Nenonen, N.

    AU - Hämäläinen, P.

    AU - Heikkilä, J.

    AU - Reiman, T.

    AU - Tappura, S.

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - A manager's active role is generally considered to be essential for successfully managing and improving safety. For example, managers are in the position to make safety-related decisions. To be able to make decisions, managers need to have a sufficient understanding of safety-related issues, such as the economic aspects of safety, the significance of which has recently increased. In order to support managers' safety-related responsibilities, it is important to understand their perceptions of safety. This paper discusses how corporate managers value safety and perceive the role of the economic aspects and evaluations of safety. Moreover, corporate managers' views on safety are discussed in relation to different economic situations. Twenty-three management representatives from five large-scale industrial Finnish companies were interviewed. The interviewed managers saw safety as an essential part of company operations and they mentioned many ways that business and economic factors affected safety. Nevertheless, they approached safety largely from the traditional viewpoint of the reactive measurement of accidents and costs, and as an ethical principle, instead of seeing safety as part of doing business. One can question whether safety is included sufficiently in decision-making if it is only approached as a value in itself, and whether the situation would be different if managers had more and better tools to model the economic aspects of safety. Economic evaluations could be useful, particularly in times of austerity when resources are scarce. At the same time, the benefits and limitations of the tools for modelling economic aspects of safety need to be considered.

    AB - A manager's active role is generally considered to be essential for successfully managing and improving safety. For example, managers are in the position to make safety-related decisions. To be able to make decisions, managers need to have a sufficient understanding of safety-related issues, such as the economic aspects of safety, the significance of which has recently increased. In order to support managers' safety-related responsibilities, it is important to understand their perceptions of safety. This paper discusses how corporate managers value safety and perceive the role of the economic aspects and evaluations of safety. Moreover, corporate managers' views on safety are discussed in relation to different economic situations. Twenty-three management representatives from five large-scale industrial Finnish companies were interviewed. The interviewed managers saw safety as an essential part of company operations and they mentioned many ways that business and economic factors affected safety. Nevertheless, they approached safety largely from the traditional viewpoint of the reactive measurement of accidents and costs, and as an ethical principle, instead of seeing safety as part of doing business. One can question whether safety is included sufficiently in decision-making if it is only approached as a value in itself, and whether the situation would be different if managers had more and better tools to model the economic aspects of safety. Economic evaluations could be useful, particularly in times of austerity when resources are scarce. At the same time, the benefits and limitations of the tools for modelling economic aspects of safety need to be considered.

    KW - economic evalutation

    KW - managers

    KW - OH&S

    KW - safety management

    KW - top management

    KW - value of safety

    U2 - 10.1080/14774003.2015.11667808

    DO - 10.1080/14774003.2015.11667808

    M3 - Article

    VL - 13

    SP - 3

    EP - 15

    JO - Policy and Practice in Health and Safety

    JF - Policy and Practice in Health and Safety

    SN - 1477-3996

    IS - 1

    ER -