Creating stakeholder value through risk mitigation Measures in the context of disaster management

Minna Räikkönen (Corresponding Author), Riitta Molarius, Kari Mäki, Kim Forssén, Peter Petiet, Albert Nieuwenhuijs

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    The resilience of critical infrastructure (CI) to extreme weather events (EWE) is one of the most demanding challenges for all stakeholders in modern society. Although partial risk reduction is feasible through the introduction and implementation of various risk mitigation measures (RMM), decision-makers at all decision-making levels are pressured to find ways to cope with the impending extreme weather and to have a thorough understanding of the EWE impacts on CI. This paper discusses how the value of RMMs can be created and assessed in a stakeholder network. Qualitative research methods, namely literature review and AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), were applied as research methods. The paper examines how disaster management and value creation both converge and differ from each other. It also presents a case study on the value of various RMM and the impacts of extreme winter conditions on electricity distribution in Finland. Based on the case study, the most important value criterion was the benefits of the RMM in economic, social, and environmental terms. At a fundamental level, the value of RMM should be expressed not only in terms of money but also in regard to safety, security, societal acceptability, CI dependability, and other typically intangible criteria. Moreover, the results reveal that the interrelationship of value creation and disaster management offers new insights to both approaches.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number14
    JournalInfrastructures
    Volume2
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2017
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Fingerprint

    disaster management
    stakeholder
    infrastructure
    research method
    weather
    literature review
    electricity
    decision making
    safety
    mitigation measure
    winter
    economics

    Keywords

    • critical infrastructure
    • extreme weather event
    • risk mitigation measure
    • value
    • value creation
    • assessment
    • disaster management
    • stakeholder

    Cite this

    @article{6c9bcc1e907345bfb4d5615e032d2b5d,
    title = "Creating stakeholder value through risk mitigation Measures in the context of disaster management",
    abstract = "The resilience of critical infrastructure (CI) to extreme weather events (EWE) is one of the most demanding challenges for all stakeholders in modern society. Although partial risk reduction is feasible through the introduction and implementation of various risk mitigation measures (RMM), decision-makers at all decision-making levels are pressured to find ways to cope with the impending extreme weather and to have a thorough understanding of the EWE impacts on CI. This paper discusses how the value of RMMs can be created and assessed in a stakeholder network. Qualitative research methods, namely literature review and AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), were applied as research methods. The paper examines how disaster management and value creation both converge and differ from each other. It also presents a case study on the value of various RMM and the impacts of extreme winter conditions on electricity distribution in Finland. Based on the case study, the most important value criterion was the benefits of the RMM in economic, social, and environmental terms. At a fundamental level, the value of RMM should be expressed not only in terms of money but also in regard to safety, security, societal acceptability, CI dependability, and other typically intangible criteria. Moreover, the results reveal that the interrelationship of value creation and disaster management offers new insights to both approaches.",
    keywords = "critical infrastructure, extreme weather event, risk mitigation measure, value, value creation, assessment, disaster management, stakeholder",
    author = "Minna R{\"a}ikk{\"o}nen and Riitta Molarius and Kari M{\"a}ki and Kim Forss{\'e}n and Peter Petiet and Albert Nieuwenhuijs",
    year = "2017",
    doi = "10.3390/infrastructures2040014",
    language = "English",
    volume = "2",
    journal = "Infrastructures",
    issn = "2412-3811",
    publisher = "MDPI",
    number = "4",

    }

    Creating stakeholder value through risk mitigation Measures in the context of disaster management. / Räikkönen, Minna (Corresponding Author); Molarius, Riitta; Mäki, Kari; Forssén, Kim; Petiet, Peter; Nieuwenhuijs, Albert.

    In: Infrastructures, Vol. 2, No. 4, 14, 2017.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Creating stakeholder value through risk mitigation Measures in the context of disaster management

    AU - Räikkönen, Minna

    AU - Molarius, Riitta

    AU - Mäki, Kari

    AU - Forssén, Kim

    AU - Petiet, Peter

    AU - Nieuwenhuijs, Albert

    PY - 2017

    Y1 - 2017

    N2 - The resilience of critical infrastructure (CI) to extreme weather events (EWE) is one of the most demanding challenges for all stakeholders in modern society. Although partial risk reduction is feasible through the introduction and implementation of various risk mitigation measures (RMM), decision-makers at all decision-making levels are pressured to find ways to cope with the impending extreme weather and to have a thorough understanding of the EWE impacts on CI. This paper discusses how the value of RMMs can be created and assessed in a stakeholder network. Qualitative research methods, namely literature review and AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), were applied as research methods. The paper examines how disaster management and value creation both converge and differ from each other. It also presents a case study on the value of various RMM and the impacts of extreme winter conditions on electricity distribution in Finland. Based on the case study, the most important value criterion was the benefits of the RMM in economic, social, and environmental terms. At a fundamental level, the value of RMM should be expressed not only in terms of money but also in regard to safety, security, societal acceptability, CI dependability, and other typically intangible criteria. Moreover, the results reveal that the interrelationship of value creation and disaster management offers new insights to both approaches.

    AB - The resilience of critical infrastructure (CI) to extreme weather events (EWE) is one of the most demanding challenges for all stakeholders in modern society. Although partial risk reduction is feasible through the introduction and implementation of various risk mitigation measures (RMM), decision-makers at all decision-making levels are pressured to find ways to cope with the impending extreme weather and to have a thorough understanding of the EWE impacts on CI. This paper discusses how the value of RMMs can be created and assessed in a stakeholder network. Qualitative research methods, namely literature review and AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), were applied as research methods. The paper examines how disaster management and value creation both converge and differ from each other. It also presents a case study on the value of various RMM and the impacts of extreme winter conditions on electricity distribution in Finland. Based on the case study, the most important value criterion was the benefits of the RMM in economic, social, and environmental terms. At a fundamental level, the value of RMM should be expressed not only in terms of money but also in regard to safety, security, societal acceptability, CI dependability, and other typically intangible criteria. Moreover, the results reveal that the interrelationship of value creation and disaster management offers new insights to both approaches.

    KW - critical infrastructure

    KW - extreme weather event

    KW - risk mitigation measure

    KW - value

    KW - value creation

    KW - assessment

    KW - disaster management

    KW - stakeholder

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078292305&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.3390/infrastructures2040014

    DO - 10.3390/infrastructures2040014

    M3 - Article

    VL - 2

    JO - Infrastructures

    JF - Infrastructures

    SN - 2412-3811

    IS - 4

    M1 - 14

    ER -