Criteria for assessment of results from level 2 PSA

Jan-Erik Holmberg, Michael Knochenhauer, Jukka Rossi

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Probabilistic criteria are used to judge the acceptability of PSA results. Highest level criteria set limits to acceptable societal risk, which requires performance of level 3 PSA. In many countries - including e.g. Finland and Sweden - performance of level 3 PSA is not required, and probabilistic decision criteria (limits or targets) are defined only at core damage frequency and large release frequency level. The definition of probabilistic criteria for level 2 PSA has been one of the key issues discussed in the Nordic study on validation of safety goals. There is a need to discuss and define more precisely the decision criteria related to unacceptable releases, as they seem to be understood differently in different organizations. For instance, the inclusion or exclusion of long-term effects makes a big difference as well as the inclusion or exclusion of the affected population in neighboring countries. This paper presents the summary and conclusions from the Nordic study with respect to probabilistic criteria for level 2 PSA. In addition, the interpretation of the release criteria (<100 TBq, Cesium-137) defined in the Finnish regulatory guide YVL 2.8 will be presented by means of off-site consequences. Such assessments of the environmental consequences can be used as references to validate safety goals related to CDF and large releases as surrogates of societal risk.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 9th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 9 
PublisherInternational Association of Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management IAPSAM
Pages1173-1180
Volume2
ISBN (Print)978-1-6227-6577-5
Publication statusPublished - 2008
MoE publication typeA4 Article in a conference publication
Event9th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management, PSAM 9 - Hong Kong, China
Duration: 18 May 200823 May 2008

Conference

Conference9th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management, PSAM 9
Abbreviated titlePSAM 9
CountryChina
CityHong Kong
Period18/05/0823/05/08

Fingerprint

Cesium

Keywords

  • PSA
  • risk criteria
  • level 2 PSA
  • large release
  • LERF

Cite this

Holmberg, J-E., Knochenhauer, M., & Rossi, J. (2008). Criteria for assessment of results from level 2 PSA. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 9  (Vol. 2, pp. 1173-1180). International Association of Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management IAPSAM.
Holmberg, Jan-Erik ; Knochenhauer, Michael ; Rossi, Jukka. / Criteria for assessment of results from level 2 PSA. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 9 . Vol. 2 International Association of Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management IAPSAM, 2008. pp. 1173-1180
@inproceedings{cb3aa535f8bd4562a8df07fd87fd8522,
title = "Criteria for assessment of results from level 2 PSA",
abstract = "Probabilistic criteria are used to judge the acceptability of PSA results. Highest level criteria set limits to acceptable societal risk, which requires performance of level 3 PSA. In many countries - including e.g. Finland and Sweden - performance of level 3 PSA is not required, and probabilistic decision criteria (limits or targets) are defined only at core damage frequency and large release frequency level. The definition of probabilistic criteria for level 2 PSA has been one of the key issues discussed in the Nordic study on validation of safety goals. There is a need to discuss and define more precisely the decision criteria related to unacceptable releases, as they seem to be understood differently in different organizations. For instance, the inclusion or exclusion of long-term effects makes a big difference as well as the inclusion or exclusion of the affected population in neighboring countries. This paper presents the summary and conclusions from the Nordic study with respect to probabilistic criteria for level 2 PSA. In addition, the interpretation of the release criteria (<100 TBq, Cesium-137) defined in the Finnish regulatory guide YVL 2.8 will be presented by means of off-site consequences. Such assessments of the environmental consequences can be used as references to validate safety goals related to CDF and large releases as surrogates of societal risk.",
keywords = "PSA, risk criteria, level 2 PSA, large release, LERF",
author = "Jan-Erik Holmberg and Michael Knochenhauer and Jukka Rossi",
year = "2008",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-6227-6577-5",
volume = "2",
pages = "1173--1180",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 9 ",
publisher = "International Association of Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management IAPSAM",
address = "United States",

}

Holmberg, J-E, Knochenhauer, M & Rossi, J 2008, Criteria for assessment of results from level 2 PSA. in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 9 . vol. 2, International Association of Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management IAPSAM, pp. 1173-1180, 9th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management, PSAM 9, Hong Kong, China, 18/05/08.

Criteria for assessment of results from level 2 PSA. / Holmberg, Jan-Erik; Knochenhauer, Michael; Rossi, Jukka.

Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 9 . Vol. 2 International Association of Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management IAPSAM, 2008. p. 1173-1180.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Criteria for assessment of results from level 2 PSA

AU - Holmberg, Jan-Erik

AU - Knochenhauer, Michael

AU - Rossi, Jukka

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Probabilistic criteria are used to judge the acceptability of PSA results. Highest level criteria set limits to acceptable societal risk, which requires performance of level 3 PSA. In many countries - including e.g. Finland and Sweden - performance of level 3 PSA is not required, and probabilistic decision criteria (limits or targets) are defined only at core damage frequency and large release frequency level. The definition of probabilistic criteria for level 2 PSA has been one of the key issues discussed in the Nordic study on validation of safety goals. There is a need to discuss and define more precisely the decision criteria related to unacceptable releases, as they seem to be understood differently in different organizations. For instance, the inclusion or exclusion of long-term effects makes a big difference as well as the inclusion or exclusion of the affected population in neighboring countries. This paper presents the summary and conclusions from the Nordic study with respect to probabilistic criteria for level 2 PSA. In addition, the interpretation of the release criteria (<100 TBq, Cesium-137) defined in the Finnish regulatory guide YVL 2.8 will be presented by means of off-site consequences. Such assessments of the environmental consequences can be used as references to validate safety goals related to CDF and large releases as surrogates of societal risk.

AB - Probabilistic criteria are used to judge the acceptability of PSA results. Highest level criteria set limits to acceptable societal risk, which requires performance of level 3 PSA. In many countries - including e.g. Finland and Sweden - performance of level 3 PSA is not required, and probabilistic decision criteria (limits or targets) are defined only at core damage frequency and large release frequency level. The definition of probabilistic criteria for level 2 PSA has been one of the key issues discussed in the Nordic study on validation of safety goals. There is a need to discuss and define more precisely the decision criteria related to unacceptable releases, as they seem to be understood differently in different organizations. For instance, the inclusion or exclusion of long-term effects makes a big difference as well as the inclusion or exclusion of the affected population in neighboring countries. This paper presents the summary and conclusions from the Nordic study with respect to probabilistic criteria for level 2 PSA. In addition, the interpretation of the release criteria (<100 TBq, Cesium-137) defined in the Finnish regulatory guide YVL 2.8 will be presented by means of off-site consequences. Such assessments of the environmental consequences can be used as references to validate safety goals related to CDF and large releases as surrogates of societal risk.

KW - PSA

KW - risk criteria

KW - level 2 PSA

KW - large release

KW - LERF

M3 - Conference article in proceedings

SN - 978-1-6227-6577-5

VL - 2

SP - 1173

EP - 1180

BT - Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 9 

PB - International Association of Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management IAPSAM

ER -

Holmberg J-E, Knochenhauer M, Rossi J. Criteria for assessment of results from level 2 PSA. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 9 . Vol. 2. International Association of Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management IAPSAM. 2008. p. 1173-1180