Criteria for assessment of results from level 2 PSA

Jan-Erik Holmberg, Michael Knochenhauer, Jukka Rossi

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Probabilistic criteria are used to judge the acceptability of PSA results. Highest level criteria set limits to acceptable societal risk, which requires performance of level 3 PSA. In many countries - including e.g. Finland and Sweden - performance of level 3 PSA is not required, and probabilistic decision criteria (limits or targets) are defined only at core damage frequency and large release frequency level. The definition of probabilistic criteria for level 2 PSA has been one of the key issues discussed in the Nordic study on validation of safety goals. There is a need to discuss and define more precisely the decision criteria related to unacceptable releases, as they seem to be understood differently in different organizations. For instance, the inclusion or exclusion of long-term effects makes a big difference as well as the inclusion or exclusion of the affected population in neighboring countries. This paper presents the summary and conclusions from the Nordic study with respect to probabilistic criteria for level 2 PSA. In addition, the interpretation of the release criteria (<100 TBq, Cesium-137) defined in the Finnish regulatory guide YVL 2.8 will be presented by means of off-site consequences. Such assessments of the environmental consequences can be used as references to validate safety goals related to CDF and large releases as surrogates of societal risk.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of the 9th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 9 
    PublisherInternational Association of Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management IAPSAM
    Pages1173-1180
    Volume2
    ISBN (Print)978-1-6227-6577-5
    Publication statusPublished - 2008
    MoE publication typeA4 Article in a conference publication
    Event9th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management, PSAM 9 - Hong Kong, China
    Duration: 18 May 200823 May 2008

    Conference

    Conference9th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management, PSAM 9
    Abbreviated titlePSAM 9
    CountryChina
    CityHong Kong
    Period18/05/0823/05/08

    Fingerprint

    Cesium

    Keywords

    • PSA
    • risk criteria
    • level 2 PSA
    • large release
    • LERF

    Cite this

    Holmberg, J-E., Knochenhauer, M., & Rossi, J. (2008). Criteria for assessment of results from level 2 PSA. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 9  (Vol. 2, pp. 1173-1180). International Association of Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management IAPSAM.
    Holmberg, Jan-Erik ; Knochenhauer, Michael ; Rossi, Jukka. / Criteria for assessment of results from level 2 PSA. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 9 . Vol. 2 International Association of Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management IAPSAM, 2008. pp. 1173-1180
    @inproceedings{cb3aa535f8bd4562a8df07fd87fd8522,
    title = "Criteria for assessment of results from level 2 PSA",
    abstract = "Probabilistic criteria are used to judge the acceptability of PSA results. Highest level criteria set limits to acceptable societal risk, which requires performance of level 3 PSA. In many countries - including e.g. Finland and Sweden - performance of level 3 PSA is not required, and probabilistic decision criteria (limits or targets) are defined only at core damage frequency and large release frequency level. The definition of probabilistic criteria for level 2 PSA has been one of the key issues discussed in the Nordic study on validation of safety goals. There is a need to discuss and define more precisely the decision criteria related to unacceptable releases, as they seem to be understood differently in different organizations. For instance, the inclusion or exclusion of long-term effects makes a big difference as well as the inclusion or exclusion of the affected population in neighboring countries. This paper presents the summary and conclusions from the Nordic study with respect to probabilistic criteria for level 2 PSA. In addition, the interpretation of the release criteria (<100 TBq, Cesium-137) defined in the Finnish regulatory guide YVL 2.8 will be presented by means of off-site consequences. Such assessments of the environmental consequences can be used as references to validate safety goals related to CDF and large releases as surrogates of societal risk.",
    keywords = "PSA, risk criteria, level 2 PSA, large release, LERF",
    author = "Jan-Erik Holmberg and Michael Knochenhauer and Jukka Rossi",
    year = "2008",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "978-1-6227-6577-5",
    volume = "2",
    pages = "1173--1180",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 9 ",
    publisher = "International Association of Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management IAPSAM",
    address = "United States",

    }

    Holmberg, J-E, Knochenhauer, M & Rossi, J 2008, Criteria for assessment of results from level 2 PSA. in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 9 . vol. 2, International Association of Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management IAPSAM, pp. 1173-1180, 9th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management, PSAM 9, Hong Kong, China, 18/05/08.

    Criteria for assessment of results from level 2 PSA. / Holmberg, Jan-Erik; Knochenhauer, Michael; Rossi, Jukka.

    Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 9 . Vol. 2 International Association of Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management IAPSAM, 2008. p. 1173-1180.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Criteria for assessment of results from level 2 PSA

    AU - Holmberg, Jan-Erik

    AU - Knochenhauer, Michael

    AU - Rossi, Jukka

    PY - 2008

    Y1 - 2008

    N2 - Probabilistic criteria are used to judge the acceptability of PSA results. Highest level criteria set limits to acceptable societal risk, which requires performance of level 3 PSA. In many countries - including e.g. Finland and Sweden - performance of level 3 PSA is not required, and probabilistic decision criteria (limits or targets) are defined only at core damage frequency and large release frequency level. The definition of probabilistic criteria for level 2 PSA has been one of the key issues discussed in the Nordic study on validation of safety goals. There is a need to discuss and define more precisely the decision criteria related to unacceptable releases, as they seem to be understood differently in different organizations. For instance, the inclusion or exclusion of long-term effects makes a big difference as well as the inclusion or exclusion of the affected population in neighboring countries. This paper presents the summary and conclusions from the Nordic study with respect to probabilistic criteria for level 2 PSA. In addition, the interpretation of the release criteria (<100 TBq, Cesium-137) defined in the Finnish regulatory guide YVL 2.8 will be presented by means of off-site consequences. Such assessments of the environmental consequences can be used as references to validate safety goals related to CDF and large releases as surrogates of societal risk.

    AB - Probabilistic criteria are used to judge the acceptability of PSA results. Highest level criteria set limits to acceptable societal risk, which requires performance of level 3 PSA. In many countries - including e.g. Finland and Sweden - performance of level 3 PSA is not required, and probabilistic decision criteria (limits or targets) are defined only at core damage frequency and large release frequency level. The definition of probabilistic criteria for level 2 PSA has been one of the key issues discussed in the Nordic study on validation of safety goals. There is a need to discuss and define more precisely the decision criteria related to unacceptable releases, as they seem to be understood differently in different organizations. For instance, the inclusion or exclusion of long-term effects makes a big difference as well as the inclusion or exclusion of the affected population in neighboring countries. This paper presents the summary and conclusions from the Nordic study with respect to probabilistic criteria for level 2 PSA. In addition, the interpretation of the release criteria (<100 TBq, Cesium-137) defined in the Finnish regulatory guide YVL 2.8 will be presented by means of off-site consequences. Such assessments of the environmental consequences can be used as references to validate safety goals related to CDF and large releases as surrogates of societal risk.

    KW - PSA

    KW - risk criteria

    KW - level 2 PSA

    KW - large release

    KW - LERF

    M3 - Conference article in proceedings

    SN - 978-1-6227-6577-5

    VL - 2

    SP - 1173

    EP - 1180

    BT - Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 9 

    PB - International Association of Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management IAPSAM

    ER -

    Holmberg J-E, Knochenhauer M, Rossi J. Criteria for assessment of results from level 2 PSA. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 9 . Vol. 2. International Association of Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management IAPSAM. 2008. p. 1173-1180