Critical assessment of the standard ASTM E 399

Kim Wallin

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    8 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The plane-strain fracture toughness, KIC, defined by ASTM E 399, is assumed to represent a size insensitive lower bound value. The interpretation is due to the original work by George Irwin. In this work the consistency of the ASTM KIC plane-strain fracture toughness standard (ASTM E 399) is examined by reassessing the original data used to develop the standard, based on present knowledge about fracture micromechanisms. Originally, the standard was based on continuum mechanics assumptions, which have later been found inadequate to describe the real physical fracture process. The materials used for the development of ASTM E 399 were generally aluminum and titanium alloys or extra high strength steels. The materials had in common that their fracture micro-mechanism was ductile fracture, i.e., the materials showed a rising tearing resistance curve. Therefore, the fracture toughness did not show the expected decreasing trend with increasing specimen size, but generally the opposite trend. The specimen thickness was assumed to be the limiting dimension, even though much of the experimental data indicated that the specimen ligament size, not the thickness, controlled the fracture toughness value.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)17 - 37
    Number of pages21
    JournalJournal of ASTM International
    Volume2
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2005
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Fingerprint

    Fracture toughness
    Physical Phenomena
    Stress Fractures
    Steel
    Mechanics
    Ligaments
    Continuum mechanics
    Ductile fracture
    High strength steel
    Titanium alloys
    Aluminum alloys
    titanium aluminum alloy

    Cite this

    Wallin, Kim. / Critical assessment of the standard ASTM E 399. In: Journal of ASTM International. 2005 ; Vol. 2, No. 4. pp. 17 - 37.
    @article{8484cef54a234f3e83a739e37489de07,
    title = "Critical assessment of the standard ASTM E 399",
    abstract = "The plane-strain fracture toughness, KIC, defined by ASTM E 399, is assumed to represent a size insensitive lower bound value. The interpretation is due to the original work by George Irwin. In this work the consistency of the ASTM KIC plane-strain fracture toughness standard (ASTM E 399) is examined by reassessing the original data used to develop the standard, based on present knowledge about fracture micromechanisms. Originally, the standard was based on continuum mechanics assumptions, which have later been found inadequate to describe the real physical fracture process. The materials used for the development of ASTM E 399 were generally aluminum and titanium alloys or extra high strength steels. The materials had in common that their fracture micro-mechanism was ductile fracture, i.e., the materials showed a rising tearing resistance curve. Therefore, the fracture toughness did not show the expected decreasing trend with increasing specimen size, but generally the opposite trend. The specimen thickness was assumed to be the limiting dimension, even though much of the experimental data indicated that the specimen ligament size, not the thickness, controlled the fracture toughness value.",
    author = "Kim Wallin",
    year = "2005",
    doi = "10.1520/JAI12051",
    language = "English",
    volume = "2",
    pages = "17 -- 37",
    journal = "Journal of ASTM International",
    issn = "1546-962X",
    publisher = "American Society for Testing and Materials ASTM",
    number = "4",

    }

    Critical assessment of the standard ASTM E 399. / Wallin, Kim.

    In: Journal of ASTM International, Vol. 2, No. 4, 2005, p. 17 - 37.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Critical assessment of the standard ASTM E 399

    AU - Wallin, Kim

    PY - 2005

    Y1 - 2005

    N2 - The plane-strain fracture toughness, KIC, defined by ASTM E 399, is assumed to represent a size insensitive lower bound value. The interpretation is due to the original work by George Irwin. In this work the consistency of the ASTM KIC plane-strain fracture toughness standard (ASTM E 399) is examined by reassessing the original data used to develop the standard, based on present knowledge about fracture micromechanisms. Originally, the standard was based on continuum mechanics assumptions, which have later been found inadequate to describe the real physical fracture process. The materials used for the development of ASTM E 399 were generally aluminum and titanium alloys or extra high strength steels. The materials had in common that their fracture micro-mechanism was ductile fracture, i.e., the materials showed a rising tearing resistance curve. Therefore, the fracture toughness did not show the expected decreasing trend with increasing specimen size, but generally the opposite trend. The specimen thickness was assumed to be the limiting dimension, even though much of the experimental data indicated that the specimen ligament size, not the thickness, controlled the fracture toughness value.

    AB - The plane-strain fracture toughness, KIC, defined by ASTM E 399, is assumed to represent a size insensitive lower bound value. The interpretation is due to the original work by George Irwin. In this work the consistency of the ASTM KIC plane-strain fracture toughness standard (ASTM E 399) is examined by reassessing the original data used to develop the standard, based on present knowledge about fracture micromechanisms. Originally, the standard was based on continuum mechanics assumptions, which have later been found inadequate to describe the real physical fracture process. The materials used for the development of ASTM E 399 were generally aluminum and titanium alloys or extra high strength steels. The materials had in common that their fracture micro-mechanism was ductile fracture, i.e., the materials showed a rising tearing resistance curve. Therefore, the fracture toughness did not show the expected decreasing trend with increasing specimen size, but generally the opposite trend. The specimen thickness was assumed to be the limiting dimension, even though much of the experimental data indicated that the specimen ligament size, not the thickness, controlled the fracture toughness value.

    U2 - 10.1520/JAI12051

    DO - 10.1520/JAI12051

    M3 - Article

    VL - 2

    SP - 17

    EP - 37

    JO - Journal of ASTM International

    JF - Journal of ASTM International

    SN - 1546-962X

    IS - 4

    ER -