Abstract
The plane-strain fracture toughness, KIC, defined by ASTM E
399, is assumed to represent a size insensitive lower bound value. The
interpretation is due to the original work by George Irwin. In this work
the consistency of the ASTM KIC plane-strain fracture
toughness standard (ASTM E 399) is examined by reassessing the original
data used to develop the standard, based on present knowledge about
fracture micromechanisms. Originally, the standard was based on
continuum mechanics assumptions, which have later been found inadequate
to describe the real physical fracture process. The materials used for
the development of ASTM E 399 were generally aluminum and titanium
alloys or extra high strength steels. The materials had in common that
their fracture micro-mechanism was ductile fracture, i.e., the materials
showed a rising tearing resistance curve. Therefore, the fracture
toughness did not show the expected decreasing trend with increasing
specimen size, but generally the opposite trend. The specimen thickness
was assumed to be the limiting dimension, even though much of the
experimental data indicated that the specimen ligament size, not the
thickness, controlled the fracture toughness value.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 17 - 37 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Journal of ASTM International |
Volume | 2 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2005 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |