Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Critical flow prediction by system codes – Recent analyses made within the FONESYS network

  • M. Lanfredini*
  • , D. Bestion
  • , F. D'Auria
  • , N. Aksan
  • , P. Fillion
  • , P. Gaillard
  • , J. Heo
  • , Ismo Karppinen
  • , K. D. Kim
  • , Joona Kurki
  • , L. Liu
  • , A. Shen
  • , J. L. Vacher
  • , D. Wang
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Pisa (UNIPI)
  • Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives (CEA)
  • Areva S.A.
  • Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI)
  • State Power Investment Corporation Research Institute (SPICRI)
  • Électricité de France S.A. (EDF)
  • Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CNL)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

A benchmark activity on Two-Phase Critical Flow (TPCF) prediction was conducted in the framework of the Forum & Network of System Thermal-Hydraulics Nuclear Reactor Thermal-Hydraulics (FONESYS). FONESYS is a network among code developers who share the common objective to strengthen current technology. The aim of the FONESYS Network is to highlight the capabilities and the robustness as well as the limitations of current SYS-TH codes to predict the main phenomena during transient scenarios in nuclear reactors for safety issues. Six separate effect test facilities, more than 90 tests, both in steady and transient conditions, were considered for the activity. Moreover, two ideal tests were designed for code to code comparison in clearly defined conditions. Overall eight System Thermal-Hydraulic (SYS-TH) codes were adopted, mostly by the developers themselves, ensuring the minimization of the user effect. Results from selected tests were also compared against Delayed Equilibrium Model, not yet implemented in industrial version of SYS-TH codes. Generally, the results of the benchmark show an improvement of the capability of SYS-TH codes to predict TPCF in the last three decades. However, predicting break flowrate remains a major source of uncertainty in accidental transient simulations of Water-Cooled Nuclear Reactors (WCNR). A set of possible actions is proposed to go beyond the current limitations of choked flow models. More detailed guidelines for using 0-D choked flow models is possible by using the experience gained by the benchmark results as well as all available validation results. Progress in understanding and 1-D modelling of flashing and choked flow might be achieved by a deeper physical analysis leading to more mechanistic models based on specific flow regime maps for high speed flow. Also the use of advanced 3-D numerical tools may help to understand and predict the complex 3-D geometrical effects.

Original languageEnglish
Article number110731
JournalNuclear Engineering and Design
Volume366
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2020
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Funding

This work was supported by the organizations involved in the FONESYS Network.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
    SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

Keywords

  • FONESYS
  • International cooperation
  • SYS-TH codes development
  • Two-phase critical flow

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Critical flow prediction by system codes – Recent analyses made within the FONESYS network'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this