Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Combining Forces - Advancing Facilities Management & Construction Through Innovation Series |
| Subtitle of host publication | Systemic Innovation in the Management of Construction Projects and Processes |
| Editors | Sami Kazi |
| Publisher | VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland |
| Pages | 263-271 |
| Volume | III |
| ISBN (Print) | 952-5004-64-3 |
| Publication status | Published - 2005 |
| MoE publication type | B3 Non-refereed article in conference proceedings |
| Event | 11th Joint CIB International Symposium 2005: Combining Forces - Advancing Facilities Management and Construction through Innovation - Helsinki, Finland Duration: 13 Jun 2005 → 16 Jun 2005 Conference number: 11 |
Conference
| Conference | 11th Joint CIB International Symposium 2005 |
|---|---|
| Country | Finland |
| City | Helsinki |
| Period | 13/06/05 → 16/06/05 |
Cite this
}
DBB, DB or DBM? Performance of road project delivery methods. / Koppinen, Tiina; Lahdenperä, Pertti.
Combining Forces - Advancing Facilities Management & Construction Through Innovation Series: Systemic Innovation in the Management of Construction Projects and Processes. ed. / Sami Kazi. Vol. III VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2005. p. 263-271.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference article in proceedings › Scientific
TY - GEN
T1 - DBB, DB or DBM? Performance of road project delivery methods
AU - Koppinen, Tiina
AU - Lahdenperä, Pertti
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - Internationally, road procurement is moving towards more integrated services. At the same time, the number of alternative project delivery methods has increased making selection of the best one difficult. The client must understand the features of the methods in order to select the most effective ones. That is why the presented study compared the performance of DesignBidBuild (DBB), Construction Management (CM), DesignBuild (DB) and DesignBuildMaintain (DBM). Based on the analysis of road procurement, more integrated services give better value for money and are of more help to the client in attaining his goals than more traditional methods. Yet, one should realise that each method has its typical applications, and all methods are not suitable for all purposes.
AB - Internationally, road procurement is moving towards more integrated services. At the same time, the number of alternative project delivery methods has increased making selection of the best one difficult. The client must understand the features of the methods in order to select the most effective ones. That is why the presented study compared the performance of DesignBidBuild (DBB), Construction Management (CM), DesignBuild (DB) and DesignBuildMaintain (DBM). Based on the analysis of road procurement, more integrated services give better value for money and are of more help to the client in attaining his goals than more traditional methods. Yet, one should realise that each method has its typical applications, and all methods are not suitable for all purposes.
M3 - Conference article in proceedings
SN - 952-5004-64-3
VL - III
SP - 263
EP - 271
BT - Combining Forces - Advancing Facilities Management & Construction Through Innovation Series
A2 - Kazi, Sami
PB - VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
ER -