Deciding between prefabrication and on-site construction: A choosing-by-advantage approach

Krishna Chauhan, Antti Peltokorpi, Rita Lavikka, Olli Seppänen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Several academic and industrial studies have documented the benefits of prefabrication compared to on-site construction. However, key construction project actors find it difficult to analyse whether prefabrication would be beneficial for their project with specific circumstances and targets. This research aims to develop a process to evaluate the impact of prefabrication in projects. First, based on the literature review and focus group discussion, we define the impact factors of prefabrication. Second, we apply Choosing by Advantage (CBA) approach together with Cost-Benefit-analysis to define a process for prefabrication impact measurement which considers various impact factors and their importance in the project. Finally, we validate the process with the industry experts. The paper contributes to knowledge on robust decision-making processes about production methods in situations in which all impact factors are not easily comparable but require a subjective valuation.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of 27th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC)
Subtitle of host publicationDublin, Ireland, 3-5 Jul 2019
EditorsC. Pasquire, F.R. Hamzeh
PublisherIGLC
Pages749-758
Number of pages10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jul 2019
MoE publication typeA4 Article in a conference publication

Publication series

SeriesAnnual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction
ISSN2309-0979

Keywords

  • Choosing-by-advantage
  • Lean construction
  • On-site construction
  • Prefabrication

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Deciding between prefabrication and on-site construction: A choosing-by-advantage approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this