### Abstract

A decimation method is applied to the tight binding model describing the two-dimensional electron gas with next-nearest-neighbor interaction in the presence of an inverse golden mean magnetic flux. The critical phase with fractal spectrum and wave function exists in a finite window in two-dimensional parameter space introducing universal features. Our decimation scheme identifies nine quantitative universality classes characterized by the limit cycles of the decimation equations. The limit cycles describe the self-similarity of the wave functions and divide them into three broader qualitative classes where the wave functions are either symmetric, asymmetric, or exhibit a type of shifted symmetry. We conjecture that the rest of the critical phase, where the fractal wave functions do not exhibit self-similarity, is characterized by strange attractors of the renormalization equations. The results are compared with those of Han et al. [Phys. Rev. B 50, 11 365 (1994)] on the same model.

Original language | English |
---|---|

Pages (from-to) | 3026-3029 |

Number of pages | 4 |

Journal | Physical Review B |

Volume | 52 |

Issue number | 5 |

DOIs | |

Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 1995 |

MoE publication type | Not Eligible |

### Fingerprint

### Cite this

*Physical Review B*,

*52*(5), 3026-3029. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.52.3026

}

*Physical Review B*, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 3026-3029. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.52.3026

**Decimation studies of Bloch electrons in a magnetic field : Higher-order limit cycles underlying the phase diagram.** / Ketoja, Jukka A.; Satija, Indubala I.; Chaves, Juan Carlos.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Decimation studies of Bloch electrons in a magnetic field

T2 - Higher-order limit cycles underlying the phase diagram

AU - Ketoja, Jukka A.

AU - Satija, Indubala I.

AU - Chaves, Juan Carlos

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - A decimation method is applied to the tight binding model describing the two-dimensional electron gas with next-nearest-neighbor interaction in the presence of an inverse golden mean magnetic flux. The critical phase with fractal spectrum and wave function exists in a finite window in two-dimensional parameter space introducing universal features. Our decimation scheme identifies nine quantitative universality classes characterized by the limit cycles of the decimation equations. The limit cycles describe the self-similarity of the wave functions and divide them into three broader qualitative classes where the wave functions are either symmetric, asymmetric, or exhibit a type of shifted symmetry. We conjecture that the rest of the critical phase, where the fractal wave functions do not exhibit self-similarity, is characterized by strange attractors of the renormalization equations. The results are compared with those of Han et al. [Phys. Rev. B 50, 11 365 (1994)] on the same model.

AB - A decimation method is applied to the tight binding model describing the two-dimensional electron gas with next-nearest-neighbor interaction in the presence of an inverse golden mean magnetic flux. The critical phase with fractal spectrum and wave function exists in a finite window in two-dimensional parameter space introducing universal features. Our decimation scheme identifies nine quantitative universality classes characterized by the limit cycles of the decimation equations. The limit cycles describe the self-similarity of the wave functions and divide them into three broader qualitative classes where the wave functions are either symmetric, asymmetric, or exhibit a type of shifted symmetry. We conjecture that the rest of the critical phase, where the fractal wave functions do not exhibit self-similarity, is characterized by strange attractors of the renormalization equations. The results are compared with those of Han et al. [Phys. Rev. B 50, 11 365 (1994)] on the same model.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=5644269217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevB.52.3026

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevB.52.3026

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 3026

EP - 3029

JO - Physical Review B

JF - Physical Review B

SN - 2469-9950

IS - 5

ER -