Decision matrix for prioritising services : first steps towards full-scale impact analysis of a public agency

Petri Mononen, Pekka Leviäkangas, Harri Haapasalo

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Evaluating quantitative socio-economic cost-benefit level impacts of public administrations/agencies is urgently called for but still a thinly charted out territory in science. This paper presents the first steps in a process of prioritising services of a public organisation via a case study of a Finnish agency. The prioritisation is made in order to enable later analysis of the effectiveness of the agency and the evaluation of the impact of its services. The main contribution of this article is in laying out the first steps of a novel and normative process for identification of the services that are most relevant in this respect. The process entails four iterative steps: 1) service catalogue mapping; 2) design of evaluation criteria; 3) compilation of decision matrix; 4) multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) - and recommendations thereof. Steps 1-3 are discussed in this article in detail, the end result being a decision matrix for MCDA.
    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages17
    JournalInternational Journal of Public Sector Performance Management
    Volume3
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2017
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Fingerprint

    impact analysis
    evaluation
    public administration
    Impact analysis
    Public agencies
    costs
    science
    economics
    Multiple criteria decision analysis

    Keywords

    • public agencies
    • public administration
    • evaluation criteria
    • decision matrix
    • performance management
    • policy objectives
    • impact analysis
    • service prioritisation
    • public services
    • case study
    • Finland
    • service catalogue mapping
    • multicriteria decision analysis
    • MCDA

    Cite this

    @article{81ac1cc35d9c426a95b384eee7ddb4a1,
    title = "Decision matrix for prioritising services : first steps towards full-scale impact analysis of a public agency",
    abstract = "Evaluating quantitative socio-economic cost-benefit level impacts of public administrations/agencies is urgently called for but still a thinly charted out territory in science. This paper presents the first steps in a process of prioritising services of a public organisation via a case study of a Finnish agency. The prioritisation is made in order to enable later analysis of the effectiveness of the agency and the evaluation of the impact of its services. The main contribution of this article is in laying out the first steps of a novel and normative process for identification of the services that are most relevant in this respect. The process entails four iterative steps: 1) service catalogue mapping; 2) design of evaluation criteria; 3) compilation of decision matrix; 4) multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) - and recommendations thereof. Steps 1-3 are discussed in this article in detail, the end result being a decision matrix for MCDA.",
    keywords = "public agencies, public administration, evaluation criteria, decision matrix, performance management, policy objectives, impact analysis, service prioritisation, public services, case study, Finland, service catalogue mapping, multicriteria decision analysis, MCDA",
    author = "Petri Mononen and Pekka Levi{\"a}kangas and Harri Haapasalo",
    year = "2017",
    doi = "10.1504/IJPSPM.2017.082498",
    language = "English",
    volume = "3",
    journal = "International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management",
    issn = "1741-1041",
    publisher = "Inderscience Publishers",
    number = "1",

    }

    Decision matrix for prioritising services : first steps towards full-scale impact analysis of a public agency. / Mononen, Petri; Leviäkangas, Pekka; Haapasalo, Harri.

    In: International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2017.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Decision matrix for prioritising services : first steps towards full-scale impact analysis of a public agency

    AU - Mononen, Petri

    AU - Leviäkangas, Pekka

    AU - Haapasalo, Harri

    PY - 2017

    Y1 - 2017

    N2 - Evaluating quantitative socio-economic cost-benefit level impacts of public administrations/agencies is urgently called for but still a thinly charted out territory in science. This paper presents the first steps in a process of prioritising services of a public organisation via a case study of a Finnish agency. The prioritisation is made in order to enable later analysis of the effectiveness of the agency and the evaluation of the impact of its services. The main contribution of this article is in laying out the first steps of a novel and normative process for identification of the services that are most relevant in this respect. The process entails four iterative steps: 1) service catalogue mapping; 2) design of evaluation criteria; 3) compilation of decision matrix; 4) multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) - and recommendations thereof. Steps 1-3 are discussed in this article in detail, the end result being a decision matrix for MCDA.

    AB - Evaluating quantitative socio-economic cost-benefit level impacts of public administrations/agencies is urgently called for but still a thinly charted out territory in science. This paper presents the first steps in a process of prioritising services of a public organisation via a case study of a Finnish agency. The prioritisation is made in order to enable later analysis of the effectiveness of the agency and the evaluation of the impact of its services. The main contribution of this article is in laying out the first steps of a novel and normative process for identification of the services that are most relevant in this respect. The process entails four iterative steps: 1) service catalogue mapping; 2) design of evaluation criteria; 3) compilation of decision matrix; 4) multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) - and recommendations thereof. Steps 1-3 are discussed in this article in detail, the end result being a decision matrix for MCDA.

    KW - public agencies

    KW - public administration

    KW - evaluation criteria

    KW - decision matrix

    KW - performance management

    KW - policy objectives

    KW - impact analysis

    KW - service prioritisation

    KW - public services

    KW - case study

    KW - Finland

    KW - service catalogue mapping

    KW - multicriteria decision analysis

    KW - MCDA

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014128840&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1504/IJPSPM.2017.082498

    DO - 10.1504/IJPSPM.2017.082498

    M3 - Article

    VL - 3

    JO - International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management

    JF - International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management

    SN - 1741-1041

    IS - 1

    ER -