Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Decoding acceptance of driver monitoring systems: Evaluating alternative measurement models, cross-country variations, and behavioural intention

  • İbrahim Öztürk*
  • , Esko Lehtonen
  • , Ruth Madigan
  • , Yee Mun Lee
  • , Elina Aittoniemi
  • , Natasha Merat
  • *Corresponding author for this work
    • University of Leeds

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review

    Abstract

    Driver monitoring systems (DMS) demonstrate significant potential for enhancing road safety. It is imperative to comprehend potential users’ attitudes towards DMS to optimise their benefits and increase public acceptance. This study investigates potential users’ acceptance of DMS in conditionally automated driving systems (SAE level 3) by evaluating alternative measurement models and assessing cross-country variations across nine countries (i.e., Germany, Spain, France, Japan, Poland, Sweden, the United Kingdom, the United States, and China). Utilising survey data from 9025 drivers, we compared the principal component analysis and the four models (a single-factor model, a six factors model, a two higher-order factors model, and a two lower-order factors model) via structural equation modelling. A model with two correlated factors, General Acceptance and Concerns, emerged as the optimal solution with high reliability across constructs. Significant cross-country differences in all constructs were found, although only 0.3% of the variance in behavioural intention was attributable to country-level differences. A linear mixed model demonstrated that the general acceptance factor positively related to behavioural intention, whereas concerns had a small but significant negative effect. The implications for research and practice suggest that while individual-level perceptions are paramount, country context also plays a role, albeit a modest one, in shaping users’ willingness to adopt DMS technologies.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number103384
    JournalTransportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
    Volume116
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2026
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Funding

    The authors would like to thank all partners within the Hi-Drive project for their cooperation and valuable contribution. This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 101006664. The sole responsibility of this publication lies with the authors. Neither the European Commission nor CINEA – in its capacity of Granting Authority – can be made responsible for any use that may be made of the information this document contains.

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
    2. SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
      SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities

    Keywords

    • Behavioural intention
    • Concerns
    • Driver monitoring system
    • Technology acceptance

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Decoding acceptance of driver monitoring systems: Evaluating alternative measurement models, cross-country variations, and behavioural intention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this