Demonstrating and argumenting safety of I&C systems

challenges and recent experiences

Janne Valkonen, Teemu Tommila, Joonas Linnosmaa, Peter Karpati, Vikash Katta

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Nuclear licensees are required to submit a documented justification of the safety of the plant and its systems to the local regulatory body. Developing this documentation is a hard task and requires a lot of effort from several stakeholders. It should be understandable, transparent, convincing and complete. Observations from the current practice indicate that the nuclear power industry would benefit from more structured, systematic and harmonized practices in engineering instrumentation and control (I&C) systems and justifying their safety. This paper describes recently recognized challenges in demonstrating the safety of digital I&C systems and suggests possible ways to solve them. Some of the proposed solutions are light improvements in the everyday documentation practices, working methods and utilization of computerized support tools, while others would involve fundamental changes in the design and documentation philosophy that are more demanding to implement.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationNuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technologies (NPIC&HMIT 2017)
PublisherAmerican Nuclear Society ANS
Pages568-580
ISBN (Electronic)978-0-89448-738-5
ISBN (Print)978-0-89448-743-9
Publication statusPublished - 2017
MoE publication typeA4 Article in a conference publication
Event10th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control and Human Machine Interface Technologies, NPIC & HMIT 2017 - San Francisco, United States
Duration: 11 Jun 201715 Jun 2017

Conference

Conference10th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control and Human Machine Interface Technologies, NPIC & HMIT 2017
Abbreviated titleNPIC & HMIT 2017
CountryUnited States
CitySan Francisco
Period11/06/1715/06/17

Fingerprint

Nuclear energy
Industry

Keywords

  • safety demonstration
  • model-based systems engineering
  • safety argumentation
  • nuclear I&C

Cite this

Valkonen, J., Tommila, T., Linnosmaa, J., Karpati, P., & Katta, V. (2017). Demonstrating and argumenting safety of I&C systems: challenges and recent experiences. In Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technologies (NPIC&HMIT 2017) (pp. 568-580). American Nuclear Society ANS.
Valkonen, Janne ; Tommila, Teemu ; Linnosmaa, Joonas ; Karpati, Peter ; Katta, Vikash. / Demonstrating and argumenting safety of I&C systems : challenges and recent experiences. Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technologies (NPIC&HMIT 2017). American Nuclear Society ANS, 2017. pp. 568-580
@inproceedings{5662eef4620a4d8a802cc5763c54b527,
title = "Demonstrating and argumenting safety of I&C systems: challenges and recent experiences",
abstract = "Nuclear licensees are required to submit a documented justification of the safety of the plant and its systems to the local regulatory body. Developing this documentation is a hard task and requires a lot of effort from several stakeholders. It should be understandable, transparent, convincing and complete. Observations from the current practice indicate that the nuclear power industry would benefit from more structured, systematic and harmonized practices in engineering instrumentation and control (I&C) systems and justifying their safety. This paper describes recently recognized challenges in demonstrating the safety of digital I&C systems and suggests possible ways to solve them. Some of the proposed solutions are light improvements in the everyday documentation practices, working methods and utilization of computerized support tools, while others would involve fundamental changes in the design and documentation philosophy that are more demanding to implement.",
keywords = "safety demonstration, model-based systems engineering, safety argumentation, nuclear I&C",
author = "Janne Valkonen and Teemu Tommila and Joonas Linnosmaa and Peter Karpati and Vikash Katta",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-0-89448-743-9",
pages = "568--580",
booktitle = "Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technologies (NPIC&HMIT 2017)",
publisher = "American Nuclear Society ANS",
address = "United States",

}

Valkonen, J, Tommila, T, Linnosmaa, J, Karpati, P & Katta, V 2017, Demonstrating and argumenting safety of I&C systems: challenges and recent experiences. in Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technologies (NPIC&HMIT 2017). American Nuclear Society ANS, pp. 568-580, 10th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control and Human Machine Interface Technologies, NPIC & HMIT 2017, San Francisco, United States, 11/06/17.

Demonstrating and argumenting safety of I&C systems : challenges and recent experiences. / Valkonen, Janne; Tommila, Teemu; Linnosmaa, Joonas; Karpati, Peter; Katta, Vikash.

Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technologies (NPIC&HMIT 2017). American Nuclear Society ANS, 2017. p. 568-580.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Demonstrating and argumenting safety of I&C systems

T2 - challenges and recent experiences

AU - Valkonen, Janne

AU - Tommila, Teemu

AU - Linnosmaa, Joonas

AU - Karpati, Peter

AU - Katta, Vikash

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Nuclear licensees are required to submit a documented justification of the safety of the plant and its systems to the local regulatory body. Developing this documentation is a hard task and requires a lot of effort from several stakeholders. It should be understandable, transparent, convincing and complete. Observations from the current practice indicate that the nuclear power industry would benefit from more structured, systematic and harmonized practices in engineering instrumentation and control (I&C) systems and justifying their safety. This paper describes recently recognized challenges in demonstrating the safety of digital I&C systems and suggests possible ways to solve them. Some of the proposed solutions are light improvements in the everyday documentation practices, working methods and utilization of computerized support tools, while others would involve fundamental changes in the design and documentation philosophy that are more demanding to implement.

AB - Nuclear licensees are required to submit a documented justification of the safety of the plant and its systems to the local regulatory body. Developing this documentation is a hard task and requires a lot of effort from several stakeholders. It should be understandable, transparent, convincing and complete. Observations from the current practice indicate that the nuclear power industry would benefit from more structured, systematic and harmonized practices in engineering instrumentation and control (I&C) systems and justifying their safety. This paper describes recently recognized challenges in demonstrating the safety of digital I&C systems and suggests possible ways to solve them. Some of the proposed solutions are light improvements in the everyday documentation practices, working methods and utilization of computerized support tools, while others would involve fundamental changes in the design and documentation philosophy that are more demanding to implement.

KW - safety demonstration

KW - model-based systems engineering

KW - safety argumentation

KW - nuclear I&C

M3 - Conference article in proceedings

SN - 978-0-89448-743-9

SP - 568

EP - 580

BT - Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technologies (NPIC&HMIT 2017)

PB - American Nuclear Society ANS

ER -

Valkonen J, Tommila T, Linnosmaa J, Karpati P, Katta V. Demonstrating and argumenting safety of I&C systems: challenges and recent experiences. In Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technologies (NPIC&HMIT 2017). American Nuclear Society ANS. 2017. p. 568-580