Abstract
The design process can be conceptualized in at least
three different ways: 1) as a process of transforming
inputs into outputs, 2) as a flow of information through
time and space, and 3) as a process for generating value
for customers. Case studies and research findings to date
indicate that design management in construction is
deficient from all three of these points of view. In this
paper, a series of experiments aiming at creating clarity
and introducing systematic management principles from all
three perspectives is described. The results of these
experiments suggest that the use of relatively simple,
albeit theory-driven, tools can achieve major
improvements in the process of construction design. It is
argued that only when based on suitable
conceptualizations, and informed by empirical data, can
effective methods be devised to ameliorate construction
design and engineering.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-16 |
Journal | Journal of Construction Research |
Volume | 3 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2002 |
MoE publication type | Not Eligible |