Abstract
Aim: To determine whether an electronic nose can differentiate cultured nonmalignant and malignant prostatic cells from each other and whether the smell print is secreted to the surrounding medium. Materials & methods: Prostatic nonmalignant (EP-156T and controls) and malignant (LNCaP) cell lines, as well as conditioned and unconditioned media, were collected. The smell prints of the samples were analyzed by a ChemPro® 100 electronic nose device. The data were normalized and dimension reduction was conducted. The samples were classified and misclassification rates were calculated. Results: The electronic nose differentiated the nonmalignant and malignant cell lines from each other, achieving misclassification rates of 2.9–3.6%. Cells did not differ from the conditioned medium but differed from the unconditioned medium (misclassification rates: 0.0–25.6%). Conclusion: Malignant and nonmalignant prostatic cell lines have distinct smell prints. Prostatic cancer cells seem to modify the smell print of their medium.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1157-1165 |
| Journal | Future Oncology |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
| MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Cell lines
- electronic noise
- machine olfaction
- olfactory detection
- prostate cancer
- volatile organic compounds
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Detection of smell print differences between nonmalignant and malignant prostate cells with an electronic nose'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver