Development of a dichotomous-flow quantitative fit test for half-mask and full-facepiece respirators

Usha Krishnan, Klaus Willeke, Arvydas Juozaitis, Matti Lehtimäki, Krzysztof Szewczyk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A new method to quantitate the fit of elastomeric half-mask and full-facepiece air-purifying respirators was developed. In this method the two flows, cartridge flow and leak flow, are separate. The air-purifying cartridges of the respirator are attached to a reference respirator. A selected flow equivalent to the inhalation flow of the wearer is drawn through the cartridge pair: A feedback system consisting of a pressure controller and a control valve is used to set the pressure drop in the mask on the subject's face equal to the pressure drop in the reference mask. The faceseal leak flow is measured while the subject holds his or her breath for a short period of time. The ratio of total flow (cartridge flow+leak flow) to leak flow is a measure of fit and is defined as the flow fit factor. Aerosol fit factors and flow fit factors were determined using sampling probes in three mask locations: top, center, and bottom. A Kruskal-Wallis test showed that aerosol fit factors obtained from the three locations were significantly different from each other (p=0.0001) while the corresponding flow fit factors were not. Aerosol fit factors obtained with the center probe had the least variability. The coefficient of variation in aerosol fit factors ranged from 5.4% for the center probe to 19% for the bottom probe; the coefficient of variation in flow fit factors was much lower, ranging from 1.7% for the top probe to 2.2% for the center and bottom probes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)223-229
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Industrial Hygiene Association Journal
Volume55
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1994
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Mechanical Ventilators
Masks
Aerosols
Respiratory Protective Devices
Pressure
Inhalation

Cite this

Krishnan, Usha ; Willeke, Klaus ; Juozaitis, Arvydas ; Lehtimäki, Matti ; Szewczyk, Krzysztof. / Development of a dichotomous-flow quantitative fit test for half-mask and full-facepiece respirators. In: American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal. 1994 ; Vol. 55, No. 3. pp. 223-229.
@article{eb74b29687034c94975281a7b6bd3251,
title = "Development of a dichotomous-flow quantitative fit test for half-mask and full-facepiece respirators",
abstract = "A new method to quantitate the fit of elastomeric half-mask and full-facepiece air-purifying respirators was developed. In this method the two flows, cartridge flow and leak flow, are separate. The air-purifying cartridges of the respirator are attached to a reference respirator. A selected flow equivalent to the inhalation flow of the wearer is drawn through the cartridge pair: A feedback system consisting of a pressure controller and a control valve is used to set the pressure drop in the mask on the subject's face equal to the pressure drop in the reference mask. The faceseal leak flow is measured while the subject holds his or her breath for a short period of time. The ratio of total flow (cartridge flow+leak flow) to leak flow is a measure of fit and is defined as the flow fit factor. Aerosol fit factors and flow fit factors were determined using sampling probes in three mask locations: top, center, and bottom. A Kruskal-Wallis test showed that aerosol fit factors obtained from the three locations were significantly different from each other (p=0.0001) while the corresponding flow fit factors were not. Aerosol fit factors obtained with the center probe had the least variability. The coefficient of variation in aerosol fit factors ranged from 5.4{\%} for the center probe to 19{\%} for the bottom probe; the coefficient of variation in flow fit factors was much lower, ranging from 1.7{\%} for the top probe to 2.2{\%} for the center and bottom probes.",
author = "Usha Krishnan and Klaus Willeke and Arvydas Juozaitis and Matti Lehtim{\"a}ki and Krzysztof Szewczyk",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1080/15428119491019069",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "223--229",
journal = "Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene",
issn = "1545-9624",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

Development of a dichotomous-flow quantitative fit test for half-mask and full-facepiece respirators. / Krishnan, Usha; Willeke, Klaus; Juozaitis, Arvydas; Lehtimäki, Matti; Szewczyk, Krzysztof.

In: American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, Vol. 55, No. 3, 1994, p. 223-229.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of a dichotomous-flow quantitative fit test for half-mask and full-facepiece respirators

AU - Krishnan, Usha

AU - Willeke, Klaus

AU - Juozaitis, Arvydas

AU - Lehtimäki, Matti

AU - Szewczyk, Krzysztof

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - A new method to quantitate the fit of elastomeric half-mask and full-facepiece air-purifying respirators was developed. In this method the two flows, cartridge flow and leak flow, are separate. The air-purifying cartridges of the respirator are attached to a reference respirator. A selected flow equivalent to the inhalation flow of the wearer is drawn through the cartridge pair: A feedback system consisting of a pressure controller and a control valve is used to set the pressure drop in the mask on the subject's face equal to the pressure drop in the reference mask. The faceseal leak flow is measured while the subject holds his or her breath for a short period of time. The ratio of total flow (cartridge flow+leak flow) to leak flow is a measure of fit and is defined as the flow fit factor. Aerosol fit factors and flow fit factors were determined using sampling probes in three mask locations: top, center, and bottom. A Kruskal-Wallis test showed that aerosol fit factors obtained from the three locations were significantly different from each other (p=0.0001) while the corresponding flow fit factors were not. Aerosol fit factors obtained with the center probe had the least variability. The coefficient of variation in aerosol fit factors ranged from 5.4% for the center probe to 19% for the bottom probe; the coefficient of variation in flow fit factors was much lower, ranging from 1.7% for the top probe to 2.2% for the center and bottom probes.

AB - A new method to quantitate the fit of elastomeric half-mask and full-facepiece air-purifying respirators was developed. In this method the two flows, cartridge flow and leak flow, are separate. The air-purifying cartridges of the respirator are attached to a reference respirator. A selected flow equivalent to the inhalation flow of the wearer is drawn through the cartridge pair: A feedback system consisting of a pressure controller and a control valve is used to set the pressure drop in the mask on the subject's face equal to the pressure drop in the reference mask. The faceseal leak flow is measured while the subject holds his or her breath for a short period of time. The ratio of total flow (cartridge flow+leak flow) to leak flow is a measure of fit and is defined as the flow fit factor. Aerosol fit factors and flow fit factors were determined using sampling probes in three mask locations: top, center, and bottom. A Kruskal-Wallis test showed that aerosol fit factors obtained from the three locations were significantly different from each other (p=0.0001) while the corresponding flow fit factors were not. Aerosol fit factors obtained with the center probe had the least variability. The coefficient of variation in aerosol fit factors ranged from 5.4% for the center probe to 19% for the bottom probe; the coefficient of variation in flow fit factors was much lower, ranging from 1.7% for the top probe to 2.2% for the center and bottom probes.

U2 - 10.1080/15428119491019069

DO - 10.1080/15428119491019069

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 223

EP - 229

JO - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene

JF - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene

SN - 1545-9624

IS - 3

ER -