TY - JOUR
T1 - Dewatering of foam-laid and water-laid structures and the formed web properties
AU - Lehmonen, Jani
AU - Retulainen, E
AU - Paltakari, Jouni
AU - Kinnunen-Raudaskoski, Karita
AU - Koponen, Antti
N1 - Funding Information:
Open access funding provided by Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT). The research leading to these results was conducted mainly as part of the “Efficient Networking towards Novel Products and Processes” (EffNet) research program of Forestcluster Ltd. The EffNet program received funding from Tekes—the Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation and Forestcluster Ltd. Tekes is nowadays called Business Finland. The research was also funded by VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd. Our gratitude also to Annika Ketola and Timo Lappalainen from VTT for providing the images in Figs. 2 and 23 and to Anastasia Ivanova from VTT for assisting in the graphical abstract.
Funding Information:
Open access funding provided by Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT). The research leading to these results was conducted mainly as part of the “Efficient Networking towards Novel Products and Processes” (EffNet) research program of Forestcluster Ltd. The EffNet program received funding from Tekes—the Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation and Forestcluster Ltd. Tekes is nowadays called Business Finland. The research was also funded by VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd. Our gratitude also to Annika Ketola and Timo Lappalainen from VTT for providing the images in Figs. and and to Anastasia Ivanova from VTT for assisting in the graphical abstract.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, The Author(s).
PY - 2020/2
Y1 - 2020/2
N2 - The use of aqueous foams as a carrier fluid for pulp fibers instead of water has re-emerged in the paper and board industry in recent years. In foam forming, a surfactant is needed to reduce the surface tension of the carrier liquid and to create foam as a process fluid and flowing medium. This presents the following questions: (1) How do the water forming and foam forming processes differ? (2) How do the obtained wet/dry fibre sheets differ after forming and after wet pressing? (3) Which differences in the process behavior and sheet properties are due to the surfactant, and which are due to the presence of air bubbles in the flowing medium? The answers to these questions were sought by using an experimental academic approach and by applying a special dynamic vacuum assisted sheet former. Although foams are much more viscous than water, dewatering times were found to be approximately equal in water and foam forming at higher vacuum levels. The hydrodynamic resistance of sheet was approximately constant during water forming, while in foam forming resistance was initially even smaller than in water forming but it increased with time, being substantially higher at the end of the forming process. In certain cases, surfactant alone was found to have a similar, albeit often lower, effect on the sheet properties of foam. Surfactant improved sheet dryness (both after forming and wet pressing), lowered density, and lowered strength properties also in water forming. Foam, on the other hand, had a crucial effect particularly on certain structural properties such as formation and porosity. The difference between water and foam-laid sheets typically reduced in line with higher wet pressing pressure. This suggests that the role of surface tension and foam bubbles in controlling interfiber contact is overridden by wet pressing pressure. Thus applying foam as a carrier fluid has characteristic effects both on the papermaking process and the end product properties. The main features of foam forming can be explained by the chemical effects caused by the surfactant, and the structural effects caused by the foam bubbles.
AB - The use of aqueous foams as a carrier fluid for pulp fibers instead of water has re-emerged in the paper and board industry in recent years. In foam forming, a surfactant is needed to reduce the surface tension of the carrier liquid and to create foam as a process fluid and flowing medium. This presents the following questions: (1) How do the water forming and foam forming processes differ? (2) How do the obtained wet/dry fibre sheets differ after forming and after wet pressing? (3) Which differences in the process behavior and sheet properties are due to the surfactant, and which are due to the presence of air bubbles in the flowing medium? The answers to these questions were sought by using an experimental academic approach and by applying a special dynamic vacuum assisted sheet former. Although foams are much more viscous than water, dewatering times were found to be approximately equal in water and foam forming at higher vacuum levels. The hydrodynamic resistance of sheet was approximately constant during water forming, while in foam forming resistance was initially even smaller than in water forming but it increased with time, being substantially higher at the end of the forming process. In certain cases, surfactant alone was found to have a similar, albeit often lower, effect on the sheet properties of foam. Surfactant improved sheet dryness (both after forming and wet pressing), lowered density, and lowered strength properties also in water forming. Foam, on the other hand, had a crucial effect particularly on certain structural properties such as formation and porosity. The difference between water and foam-laid sheets typically reduced in line with higher wet pressing pressure. This suggests that the role of surface tension and foam bubbles in controlling interfiber contact is overridden by wet pressing pressure. Thus applying foam as a carrier fluid has characteristic effects both on the papermaking process and the end product properties. The main features of foam forming can be explained by the chemical effects caused by the surfactant, and the structural effects caused by the foam bubbles.
KW - foam forming
KW - water forming
KW - dewatering
KW - structural properties
KW - in-plane strength properties
KW - interfiber contact
KW - z-strength
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075458627&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10570-019-02842-x
DO - 10.1007/s10570-019-02842-x
M3 - Review Article
SN - 0969-0239
VL - 27
SP - 1127
EP - 1146
JO - Cellulose
JF - Cellulose
ER -