Digital disruption of the AEC industry: technology-oriented scenarios for possible future development paths

Rita Lavikka, Johanna Kallio, Thomas Casey, Miimu Airaksinen

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Decision-makers in the architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) industry lack knowledge about the implementation of digitalization to generate value. We applied a scenario planning method developed by Schoemaker and Mavaddat to provide decision-makers with information for using digital data and technologies to create value for customers. We aim to theoretically understand how the scenario planning process helps AEC decision-makers to make sense of the future. Our findings show that boundary spanners are needed for steering the discussions among industry actors towards shared knowledge about the technological, social, economic and political changes needed at the industry level to optimize the benefits of digitalization. Our findings also show that boundary spanners apply scenario figures as boundary objects to cross knowledge boundaries. Based on our findings, we theoretically conceptualize scenario planning as a boundary-spanning activity that enables AEC decision-makers from different fields to share tacit knowledge and to cross knowledge boundaries. The practical implication is that scenario planning provides a method for AEC decision-makers to make sense of the changes needed to realize the preferred future for the industry.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)635-650
    Number of pages15
    JournalConstruction Management and Economics
    Volume36
    Issue number11
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2 Nov 2018
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Fingerprint

    Construction industry
    Planning
    Industry
    Economics
    Engineering industry
    Development path
    Decision maker
    Disruption
    Scenarios
    Scenario planning
    Boundary spanners

    Keywords

    • boundary objects
    • boundary spanning
    • construction industry
    • Digital
    • scenarios

    Cite this

    @article{ca42fa962ae3494c8586a1e5c50d3269,
    title = "Digital disruption of the AEC industry: technology-oriented scenarios for possible future development paths",
    abstract = "Decision-makers in the architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) industry lack knowledge about the implementation of digitalization to generate value. We applied a scenario planning method developed by Schoemaker and Mavaddat to provide decision-makers with information for using digital data and technologies to create value for customers. We aim to theoretically understand how the scenario planning process helps AEC decision-makers to make sense of the future. Our findings show that boundary spanners are needed for steering the discussions among industry actors towards shared knowledge about the technological, social, economic and political changes needed at the industry level to optimize the benefits of digitalization. Our findings also show that boundary spanners apply scenario figures as boundary objects to cross knowledge boundaries. Based on our findings, we theoretically conceptualize scenario planning as a boundary-spanning activity that enables AEC decision-makers from different fields to share tacit knowledge and to cross knowledge boundaries. The practical implication is that scenario planning provides a method for AEC decision-makers to make sense of the changes needed to realize the preferred future for the industry.",
    keywords = "boundary objects, boundary spanning, construction industry, Digital, scenarios",
    author = "Rita Lavikka and Johanna Kallio and Thomas Casey and Miimu Airaksinen",
    year = "2018",
    month = "11",
    day = "2",
    doi = "10.1080/01446193.2018.1476729",
    language = "English",
    volume = "36",
    pages = "635--650",
    journal = "Construction Management and Economics",
    issn = "0144-6193",
    publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
    number = "11",

    }

    Digital disruption of the AEC industry : technology-oriented scenarios for possible future development paths. / Lavikka, Rita; Kallio, Johanna; Casey, Thomas; Airaksinen, Miimu.

    In: Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 36, No. 11, 02.11.2018, p. 635-650.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Digital disruption of the AEC industry

    T2 - technology-oriented scenarios for possible future development paths

    AU - Lavikka, Rita

    AU - Kallio, Johanna

    AU - Casey, Thomas

    AU - Airaksinen, Miimu

    PY - 2018/11/2

    Y1 - 2018/11/2

    N2 - Decision-makers in the architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) industry lack knowledge about the implementation of digitalization to generate value. We applied a scenario planning method developed by Schoemaker and Mavaddat to provide decision-makers with information for using digital data and technologies to create value for customers. We aim to theoretically understand how the scenario planning process helps AEC decision-makers to make sense of the future. Our findings show that boundary spanners are needed for steering the discussions among industry actors towards shared knowledge about the technological, social, economic and political changes needed at the industry level to optimize the benefits of digitalization. Our findings also show that boundary spanners apply scenario figures as boundary objects to cross knowledge boundaries. Based on our findings, we theoretically conceptualize scenario planning as a boundary-spanning activity that enables AEC decision-makers from different fields to share tacit knowledge and to cross knowledge boundaries. The practical implication is that scenario planning provides a method for AEC decision-makers to make sense of the changes needed to realize the preferred future for the industry.

    AB - Decision-makers in the architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) industry lack knowledge about the implementation of digitalization to generate value. We applied a scenario planning method developed by Schoemaker and Mavaddat to provide decision-makers with information for using digital data and technologies to create value for customers. We aim to theoretically understand how the scenario planning process helps AEC decision-makers to make sense of the future. Our findings show that boundary spanners are needed for steering the discussions among industry actors towards shared knowledge about the technological, social, economic and political changes needed at the industry level to optimize the benefits of digitalization. Our findings also show that boundary spanners apply scenario figures as boundary objects to cross knowledge boundaries. Based on our findings, we theoretically conceptualize scenario planning as a boundary-spanning activity that enables AEC decision-makers from different fields to share tacit knowledge and to cross knowledge boundaries. The practical implication is that scenario planning provides a method for AEC decision-makers to make sense of the changes needed to realize the preferred future for the industry.

    KW - boundary objects

    KW - boundary spanning

    KW - construction industry

    KW - Digital

    KW - scenarios

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049219167&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1080/01446193.2018.1476729

    DO - 10.1080/01446193.2018.1476729

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:85049219167

    VL - 36

    SP - 635

    EP - 650

    JO - Construction Management and Economics

    JF - Construction Management and Economics

    SN - 0144-6193

    IS - 11

    ER -