Abstract
User experience (UX) evaluation is typically based on
either open evaluation or predefined measures. In our
study, we tested a new UX evaluation method by combining
both approaches in a collaborative evaluation. When
evaluating a digital newspaper over six weeks, the users
were asked to describe the reading experience in their
own words on an online platform shared among the test
participants. General statements were formulated based on
user-defined attributes and rated by all users on a
numeric scale at different stages of the test period.
This method resulted with quantitative data of even
entirely new experience measures that would not have been
found in predefined sets of UX categories.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | The 27th Bled eConference eEcosystems |
Pages | 17-24 |
Volume | Research |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |
MoE publication type | B3 Non-refereed article in conference proceedings |
Event | 27th Bled eConference : eEcosystems - Bled, Slovenia Duration: 1 Jun 2014 → 5 Jun 2014 Conference number: 27 |
Conference
Conference | 27th Bled eConference |
---|---|
Country/Territory | Slovenia |
City | Bled |
Period | 1/06/14 → 5/06/14 |
Keywords
- user experience
- digital newspaper
- open evaluation
- user-defined attributes
- online platform
- empirical study