Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Digitalisation of industries: A comparative analysis from Australia and Finland

  • Pekka Leviäkangas
  • , Osmo Kauppila*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
    • University of Oulu

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    This paper features a two-country study on digitalisation: Australia and Finland. The empirical data was acquired from the national accounts for 1995-2015 in Australia and for 1998-2012 in Finland. This data was averaged for a cross-sectional comparison of industries and then for the two countries. Different industries' advancement in digitalisation seems to follow approximately the same pacing in both countries. Financial and insurance services, telecommunications and media, and professional, technical and scientific services are the most active digitalisers. The empirical testing of the a priori assumption that digitalisation over a long period of time leads to greater productivity shows that the observed correlation between information and communication technology (ICT) investment and productivity is weak. The results partly confirm Solow's productivity paradox.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)70-89
    Number of pages20
    JournalInternational Journal of Technology, Policy and Management
    Volume20
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2020
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
      SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth

    Keywords

    • Australia
    • Digitalisation
    • Finland
    • ICT
    • Industry
    • Information and communication technology
    • Investment
    • Labour productivity
    • National accounts
    • Rank correlation
    • Total productivity

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Digitalisation of industries: A comparative analysis from Australia and Finland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this