Does facing traffic improve pedestrian safety?

Juha Luoma (Corresponding Author), Harri Peltola

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    9 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This study was designed to evaluate the potential safety importance of the walking direction along a road by examining pedestrian accidents as a function of exposure to risk. The study was limited to rural two-lane roads with no pavement or pedestrian lane. The accident data included police-reported road accidents from Finland between 2006 and 2010 in which a motorized vehicle had struck a pedestrian walking along the road. There were 18 accidents involving a fatally injured pedestrian and 87 accidents involving a non-fatally injured pedestrian. The exposure data collected from the roughly 3400 km included 258 pedestrians. The main finding was that the mean effect of facing traffic compared to walking with traffic was a 77% decrease in fatal and in non-fatal injury pedestrian accidents. The results further showed that the effects were greater for main roads than for secondary roads. The main implication of this study is that information about the importance of facing traffic should be reinforced with specific information about its substantial safety benefits.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1207-1210
    Number of pages4
    JournalAccident Analysis and Prevention
    Volume50
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Fingerprint

    Pedestrian safety
    pedestrian
    Accidents
    traffic
    accident
    Safety
    road
    Walking
    Highway accidents
    Law enforcement
    Pavements
    Police
    Finland
    Pedestrians
    police
    Wounds and Injuries

    Keywords

    • Face traffic
    • pedestrian
    • safety
    • two-lane road

    Cite this

    @article{bfdb72da9ee44d4bbad83b6c7f2b3099,
    title = "Does facing traffic improve pedestrian safety?",
    abstract = "This study was designed to evaluate the potential safety importance of the walking direction along a road by examining pedestrian accidents as a function of exposure to risk. The study was limited to rural two-lane roads with no pavement or pedestrian lane. The accident data included police-reported road accidents from Finland between 2006 and 2010 in which a motorized vehicle had struck a pedestrian walking along the road. There were 18 accidents involving a fatally injured pedestrian and 87 accidents involving a non-fatally injured pedestrian. The exposure data collected from the roughly 3400 km included 258 pedestrians. The main finding was that the mean effect of facing traffic compared to walking with traffic was a 77{\%} decrease in fatal and in non-fatal injury pedestrian accidents. The results further showed that the effects were greater for main roads than for secondary roads. The main implication of this study is that information about the importance of facing traffic should be reinforced with specific information about its substantial safety benefits.",
    keywords = "Face traffic, pedestrian, safety, two-lane road",
    author = "Juha Luoma and Harri Peltola",
    year = "2013",
    doi = "10.1016/j.aap.2012.09.023",
    language = "English",
    volume = "50",
    pages = "1207--1210",
    journal = "Accident Analysis and Prevention",
    issn = "0001-4575",
    publisher = "Elsevier",

    }

    Does facing traffic improve pedestrian safety? / Luoma, Juha (Corresponding Author); Peltola, Harri.

    In: Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 50, 2013, p. 1207-1210.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Does facing traffic improve pedestrian safety?

    AU - Luoma, Juha

    AU - Peltola, Harri

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - This study was designed to evaluate the potential safety importance of the walking direction along a road by examining pedestrian accidents as a function of exposure to risk. The study was limited to rural two-lane roads with no pavement or pedestrian lane. The accident data included police-reported road accidents from Finland between 2006 and 2010 in which a motorized vehicle had struck a pedestrian walking along the road. There were 18 accidents involving a fatally injured pedestrian and 87 accidents involving a non-fatally injured pedestrian. The exposure data collected from the roughly 3400 km included 258 pedestrians. The main finding was that the mean effect of facing traffic compared to walking with traffic was a 77% decrease in fatal and in non-fatal injury pedestrian accidents. The results further showed that the effects were greater for main roads than for secondary roads. The main implication of this study is that information about the importance of facing traffic should be reinforced with specific information about its substantial safety benefits.

    AB - This study was designed to evaluate the potential safety importance of the walking direction along a road by examining pedestrian accidents as a function of exposure to risk. The study was limited to rural two-lane roads with no pavement or pedestrian lane. The accident data included police-reported road accidents from Finland between 2006 and 2010 in which a motorized vehicle had struck a pedestrian walking along the road. There were 18 accidents involving a fatally injured pedestrian and 87 accidents involving a non-fatally injured pedestrian. The exposure data collected from the roughly 3400 km included 258 pedestrians. The main finding was that the mean effect of facing traffic compared to walking with traffic was a 77% decrease in fatal and in non-fatal injury pedestrian accidents. The results further showed that the effects were greater for main roads than for secondary roads. The main implication of this study is that information about the importance of facing traffic should be reinforced with specific information about its substantial safety benefits.

    KW - Face traffic

    KW - pedestrian

    KW - safety

    KW - two-lane road

    U2 - 10.1016/j.aap.2012.09.023

    DO - 10.1016/j.aap.2012.09.023

    M3 - Article

    VL - 50

    SP - 1207

    EP - 1210

    JO - Accident Analysis and Prevention

    JF - Accident Analysis and Prevention

    SN - 0001-4575

    ER -