Does the knowledge trap exist? The diverging roles of domestic and foreign capacities for evolution of knowledge creation in China, India, Brazil, and Northern and Sub-Saharan Africa, 1986-2009

Hannes Toivanen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

Abstract

In development, the issue of domestic insularity and foreign dependency are recurring themes, often invoked as explanatory categories for the success or failure of long-term development. We develop a bibliometric method to assess the relative share of domestic and foreign contributions to production of new knowledge in developing countries to analyze the long-term evolution of research systems in Brazil, China, India, and Northern and Sub-Saharan Africa 1986-2009, as well as provide comparative perspectives with similar data for small, advanced economy country, Finland. Whereas these developing countries established relatively homogenous group of research systems in mid-1980s in terms of knowledge production, their developmental trajectories diverged substantially since mid-1990s in terms of total and relative knowledge production as China and Brazil forged ahead, India and Northern Africa established a middle-tier group, and Sub-Saharan Africa fell further behind. The relative share of domestic capacities correlates with the timing, and subsequent divergence of research systems, as countries with increased domestic knowledge capacities enjoy higher long-term growth in terms of knowledge production, and the other way around. Persistently low or long-term decline of domestic knowledge capacities correlates with lagging growth of research capacities, suggesting that some developing countries may be facing "knowledge traps", unless their research systems undergo structural and strategic reforms
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationGlobelics 2012
Subtitle of host publicationProceedings CD
Place of PublicationHangzhou, China
Pages2475-2498
Publication statusPublished - 2012
MoE publication typeA4 Article in a conference publication
EventThe 10th GLOBELICS International Conference: Innovation and Development: Opportunities and Challenges in Globalisation - Hangzhou, China
Duration: 8 Nov 201211 Nov 2012

Conference

ConferenceThe 10th GLOBELICS International Conference: Innovation and Development: Opportunities and Challenges in Globalisation
CountryChina
CityHangzhou
Period8/11/1211/11/12

Fingerprint

Trap
Brazil
Knowledge creation
Sub-Saharan Africa
India
China
Systems research
Knowledge production
Developing countries
Correlates
Finland
Africa
Long-term growth
Divergence
Trajectory
Bibliometrics

Keywords

  • Research
  • sources of knowledge
  • innovation systems
  • developing countries
  • knowledge trap

Cite this

@inproceedings{dbae537afb704f7c9fe84874451f321b,
title = "Does the knowledge trap exist? The diverging roles of domestic and foreign capacities for evolution of knowledge creation in China, India, Brazil, and Northern and Sub-Saharan Africa, 1986-2009",
abstract = "In development, the issue of domestic insularity and foreign dependency are recurring themes, often invoked as explanatory categories for the success or failure of long-term development. We develop a bibliometric method to assess the relative share of domestic and foreign contributions to production of new knowledge in developing countries to analyze the long-term evolution of research systems in Brazil, China, India, and Northern and Sub-Saharan Africa 1986-2009, as well as provide comparative perspectives with similar data for small, advanced economy country, Finland. Whereas these developing countries established relatively homogenous group of research systems in mid-1980s in terms of knowledge production, their developmental trajectories diverged substantially since mid-1990s in terms of total and relative knowledge production as China and Brazil forged ahead, India and Northern Africa established a middle-tier group, and Sub-Saharan Africa fell further behind. The relative share of domestic capacities correlates with the timing, and subsequent divergence of research systems, as countries with increased domestic knowledge capacities enjoy higher long-term growth in terms of knowledge production, and the other way around. Persistently low or long-term decline of domestic knowledge capacities correlates with lagging growth of research capacities, suggesting that some developing countries may be facing {"}knowledge traps{"}, unless their research systems undergo structural and strategic reforms",
keywords = "Research, sources of knowledge, innovation systems, developing countries, knowledge trap",
author = "Hannes Toivanen",
note = "Project code: 39734 Project code: 75913",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
pages = "2475--2498",
booktitle = "Globelics 2012",

}

Toivanen, H 2012, Does the knowledge trap exist? The diverging roles of domestic and foreign capacities for evolution of knowledge creation in China, India, Brazil, and Northern and Sub-Saharan Africa, 1986-2009. in Globelics 2012: Proceedings CD. Hangzhou, China, pp. 2475-2498, The 10th GLOBELICS International Conference: Innovation and Development: Opportunities and Challenges in Globalisation, Hangzhou, China, 8/11/12.

Does the knowledge trap exist? The diverging roles of domestic and foreign capacities for evolution of knowledge creation in China, India, Brazil, and Northern and Sub-Saharan Africa, 1986-2009. / Toivanen, Hannes.

Globelics 2012: Proceedings CD. Hangzhou, China, 2012. p. 2475-2498.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Does the knowledge trap exist? The diverging roles of domestic and foreign capacities for evolution of knowledge creation in China, India, Brazil, and Northern and Sub-Saharan Africa, 1986-2009

AU - Toivanen, Hannes

N1 - Project code: 39734 Project code: 75913

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - In development, the issue of domestic insularity and foreign dependency are recurring themes, often invoked as explanatory categories for the success or failure of long-term development. We develop a bibliometric method to assess the relative share of domestic and foreign contributions to production of new knowledge in developing countries to analyze the long-term evolution of research systems in Brazil, China, India, and Northern and Sub-Saharan Africa 1986-2009, as well as provide comparative perspectives with similar data for small, advanced economy country, Finland. Whereas these developing countries established relatively homogenous group of research systems in mid-1980s in terms of knowledge production, their developmental trajectories diverged substantially since mid-1990s in terms of total and relative knowledge production as China and Brazil forged ahead, India and Northern Africa established a middle-tier group, and Sub-Saharan Africa fell further behind. The relative share of domestic capacities correlates with the timing, and subsequent divergence of research systems, as countries with increased domestic knowledge capacities enjoy higher long-term growth in terms of knowledge production, and the other way around. Persistently low or long-term decline of domestic knowledge capacities correlates with lagging growth of research capacities, suggesting that some developing countries may be facing "knowledge traps", unless their research systems undergo structural and strategic reforms

AB - In development, the issue of domestic insularity and foreign dependency are recurring themes, often invoked as explanatory categories for the success or failure of long-term development. We develop a bibliometric method to assess the relative share of domestic and foreign contributions to production of new knowledge in developing countries to analyze the long-term evolution of research systems in Brazil, China, India, and Northern and Sub-Saharan Africa 1986-2009, as well as provide comparative perspectives with similar data for small, advanced economy country, Finland. Whereas these developing countries established relatively homogenous group of research systems in mid-1980s in terms of knowledge production, their developmental trajectories diverged substantially since mid-1990s in terms of total and relative knowledge production as China and Brazil forged ahead, India and Northern Africa established a middle-tier group, and Sub-Saharan Africa fell further behind. The relative share of domestic capacities correlates with the timing, and subsequent divergence of research systems, as countries with increased domestic knowledge capacities enjoy higher long-term growth in terms of knowledge production, and the other way around. Persistently low or long-term decline of domestic knowledge capacities correlates with lagging growth of research capacities, suggesting that some developing countries may be facing "knowledge traps", unless their research systems undergo structural and strategic reforms

KW - Research

KW - sources of knowledge

KW - innovation systems

KW - developing countries

KW - knowledge trap

M3 - Conference article in proceedings

SP - 2475

EP - 2498

BT - Globelics 2012

CY - Hangzhou, China

ER -