Effect of three countermeasures against the illegal crossing of railway tracks

Anne Silla (Corresponding Author), Juha Luoma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate the effects of three countermeasures - landscaping, building a fence and prohibitive signs - on the frequency of trespassing, which in this case means crossing the track at places where it is forbidden. At each location the official route was no more than 300 m away. The main results showed that the effect of each countermeasure on the frequency of trespassing was statistically significant. Specifically, the fencing reduced trespassing by 94.6%, followed by landscaping (91.3%) and prohibitive signs (30.7%). The majority of illegal crossings were committed alone and the persons trespassing were mostly adults and men. In addition, the results demonstrated some tendencies of how the effects of the selected countermeasures can vary with the characteristics of the trespassers. The main implication of this study is that the building of physical barriers such as landscaping or fencing is recommended for reducing trespassing. However, if the required resources are not available or the site is not suitable for such measures, the use of prohibitive signs is recommended. Further, there is a need to tailor the countermeasures to the characteristics of the trespassers in order to ensure that the most appropriate countermeasures are applied.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1089-1094
Number of pages6
JournalAccident Analysis and Prevention
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

landscape management
Fences
Architectural Accessibility
German Federal Railways
human being
resources

Keywords

  • Railway trespassing
  • Railways
  • Measurement
  • Countermeasures

Cite this

@article{c6e4ba050eeb4521ac154cc09033c714,
title = "Effect of three countermeasures against the illegal crossing of railway tracks",
abstract = "This study was designed to investigate the effects of three countermeasures - landscaping, building a fence and prohibitive signs - on the frequency of trespassing, which in this case means crossing the track at places where it is forbidden. At each location the official route was no more than 300 m away. The main results showed that the effect of each countermeasure on the frequency of trespassing was statistically significant. Specifically, the fencing reduced trespassing by 94.6{\%}, followed by landscaping (91.3{\%}) and prohibitive signs (30.7{\%}). The majority of illegal crossings were committed alone and the persons trespassing were mostly adults and men. In addition, the results demonstrated some tendencies of how the effects of the selected countermeasures can vary with the characteristics of the trespassers. The main implication of this study is that the building of physical barriers such as landscaping or fencing is recommended for reducing trespassing. However, if the required resources are not available or the site is not suitable for such measures, the use of prohibitive signs is recommended. Further, there is a need to tailor the countermeasures to the characteristics of the trespassers in order to ensure that the most appropriate countermeasures are applied.",
keywords = "Railway trespassing, Railways, Measurement, Countermeasures",
author = "Anne Silla and Juha Luoma",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.017",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "1089--1094",
journal = "Accident Analysis and Prevention",
issn = "0001-4575",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

Effect of three countermeasures against the illegal crossing of railway tracks. / Silla, Anne (Corresponding Author); Luoma, Juha.

In: Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2011, p. 1089-1094.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of three countermeasures against the illegal crossing of railway tracks

AU - Silla, Anne

AU - Luoma, Juha

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - This study was designed to investigate the effects of three countermeasures - landscaping, building a fence and prohibitive signs - on the frequency of trespassing, which in this case means crossing the track at places where it is forbidden. At each location the official route was no more than 300 m away. The main results showed that the effect of each countermeasure on the frequency of trespassing was statistically significant. Specifically, the fencing reduced trespassing by 94.6%, followed by landscaping (91.3%) and prohibitive signs (30.7%). The majority of illegal crossings were committed alone and the persons trespassing were mostly adults and men. In addition, the results demonstrated some tendencies of how the effects of the selected countermeasures can vary with the characteristics of the trespassers. The main implication of this study is that the building of physical barriers such as landscaping or fencing is recommended for reducing trespassing. However, if the required resources are not available or the site is not suitable for such measures, the use of prohibitive signs is recommended. Further, there is a need to tailor the countermeasures to the characteristics of the trespassers in order to ensure that the most appropriate countermeasures are applied.

AB - This study was designed to investigate the effects of three countermeasures - landscaping, building a fence and prohibitive signs - on the frequency of trespassing, which in this case means crossing the track at places where it is forbidden. At each location the official route was no more than 300 m away. The main results showed that the effect of each countermeasure on the frequency of trespassing was statistically significant. Specifically, the fencing reduced trespassing by 94.6%, followed by landscaping (91.3%) and prohibitive signs (30.7%). The majority of illegal crossings were committed alone and the persons trespassing were mostly adults and men. In addition, the results demonstrated some tendencies of how the effects of the selected countermeasures can vary with the characteristics of the trespassers. The main implication of this study is that the building of physical barriers such as landscaping or fencing is recommended for reducing trespassing. However, if the required resources are not available or the site is not suitable for such measures, the use of prohibitive signs is recommended. Further, there is a need to tailor the countermeasures to the characteristics of the trespassers in order to ensure that the most appropriate countermeasures are applied.

KW - Railway trespassing

KW - Railways

KW - Measurement

KW - Countermeasures

U2 - 10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.017

DO - 10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.017

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 1089

EP - 1094

JO - Accident Analysis and Prevention

JF - Accident Analysis and Prevention

SN - 0001-4575

IS - 3

ER -