Effect of three countermeasures against the illegal crossing of railway tracks

Anne Silla (Corresponding Author), Juha Luoma

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    17 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This study was designed to investigate the effects of three countermeasures - landscaping, building a fence and prohibitive signs - on the frequency of trespassing, which in this case means crossing the track at places where it is forbidden. At each location the official route was no more than 300 m away. The main results showed that the effect of each countermeasure on the frequency of trespassing was statistically significant. Specifically, the fencing reduced trespassing by 94.6%, followed by landscaping (91.3%) and prohibitive signs (30.7%). The majority of illegal crossings were committed alone and the persons trespassing were mostly adults and men. In addition, the results demonstrated some tendencies of how the effects of the selected countermeasures can vary with the characteristics of the trespassers. The main implication of this study is that the building of physical barriers such as landscaping or fencing is recommended for reducing trespassing. However, if the required resources are not available or the site is not suitable for such measures, the use of prohibitive signs is recommended. Further, there is a need to tailor the countermeasures to the characteristics of the trespassers in order to ensure that the most appropriate countermeasures are applied.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1089-1094
    Number of pages6
    JournalAccident Analysis and Prevention
    Volume43
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Fingerprint

    landscape management
    Fences
    Architectural Accessibility
    German Federal Railways
    human being
    resources

    Keywords

    • Railway trespassing
    • Railways
    • Measurement
    • Countermeasures

    Cite this

    @article{c6e4ba050eeb4521ac154cc09033c714,
    title = "Effect of three countermeasures against the illegal crossing of railway tracks",
    abstract = "This study was designed to investigate the effects of three countermeasures - landscaping, building a fence and prohibitive signs - on the frequency of trespassing, which in this case means crossing the track at places where it is forbidden. At each location the official route was no more than 300 m away. The main results showed that the effect of each countermeasure on the frequency of trespassing was statistically significant. Specifically, the fencing reduced trespassing by 94.6{\%}, followed by landscaping (91.3{\%}) and prohibitive signs (30.7{\%}). The majority of illegal crossings were committed alone and the persons trespassing were mostly adults and men. In addition, the results demonstrated some tendencies of how the effects of the selected countermeasures can vary with the characteristics of the trespassers. The main implication of this study is that the building of physical barriers such as landscaping or fencing is recommended for reducing trespassing. However, if the required resources are not available or the site is not suitable for such measures, the use of prohibitive signs is recommended. Further, there is a need to tailor the countermeasures to the characteristics of the trespassers in order to ensure that the most appropriate countermeasures are applied.",
    keywords = "Railway trespassing, Railways, Measurement, Countermeasures",
    author = "Anne Silla and Juha Luoma",
    year = "2011",
    doi = "10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.017",
    language = "English",
    volume = "43",
    pages = "1089--1094",
    journal = "Accident Analysis and Prevention",
    issn = "0001-4575",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "3",

    }

    Effect of three countermeasures against the illegal crossing of railway tracks. / Silla, Anne (Corresponding Author); Luoma, Juha.

    In: Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2011, p. 1089-1094.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Effect of three countermeasures against the illegal crossing of railway tracks

    AU - Silla, Anne

    AU - Luoma, Juha

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - This study was designed to investigate the effects of three countermeasures - landscaping, building a fence and prohibitive signs - on the frequency of trespassing, which in this case means crossing the track at places where it is forbidden. At each location the official route was no more than 300 m away. The main results showed that the effect of each countermeasure on the frequency of trespassing was statistically significant. Specifically, the fencing reduced trespassing by 94.6%, followed by landscaping (91.3%) and prohibitive signs (30.7%). The majority of illegal crossings were committed alone and the persons trespassing were mostly adults and men. In addition, the results demonstrated some tendencies of how the effects of the selected countermeasures can vary with the characteristics of the trespassers. The main implication of this study is that the building of physical barriers such as landscaping or fencing is recommended for reducing trespassing. However, if the required resources are not available or the site is not suitable for such measures, the use of prohibitive signs is recommended. Further, there is a need to tailor the countermeasures to the characteristics of the trespassers in order to ensure that the most appropriate countermeasures are applied.

    AB - This study was designed to investigate the effects of three countermeasures - landscaping, building a fence and prohibitive signs - on the frequency of trespassing, which in this case means crossing the track at places where it is forbidden. At each location the official route was no more than 300 m away. The main results showed that the effect of each countermeasure on the frequency of trespassing was statistically significant. Specifically, the fencing reduced trespassing by 94.6%, followed by landscaping (91.3%) and prohibitive signs (30.7%). The majority of illegal crossings were committed alone and the persons trespassing were mostly adults and men. In addition, the results demonstrated some tendencies of how the effects of the selected countermeasures can vary with the characteristics of the trespassers. The main implication of this study is that the building of physical barriers such as landscaping or fencing is recommended for reducing trespassing. However, if the required resources are not available or the site is not suitable for such measures, the use of prohibitive signs is recommended. Further, there is a need to tailor the countermeasures to the characteristics of the trespassers in order to ensure that the most appropriate countermeasures are applied.

    KW - Railway trespassing

    KW - Railways

    KW - Measurement

    KW - Countermeasures

    U2 - 10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.017

    DO - 10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.017

    M3 - Article

    VL - 43

    SP - 1089

    EP - 1094

    JO - Accident Analysis and Prevention

    JF - Accident Analysis and Prevention

    SN - 0001-4575

    IS - 3

    ER -