TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of digitalization of nuclear power plant control rooms on human reliability analysis
T2 - A review
AU - Porthin, Markus
AU - Liinasuo, Marja
AU - Kling, Terhi
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by The Finnish Research Programme on Nuclear Power Plant Safety 2015 – 2018 ( SAFIR2018 ). The authors wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions that helped to improve the quality of the paper.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/2
Y1 - 2020/2
N2 - The changes in the operating conditions of the main control room of nuclear power plants due to new digitalized human-system interfaces (HSIs) pose challenges to traditional human reliability analysis (HRA) methods. This paper reviews current knowledge about the effect of digital HSI on human behavior and reliability, relevant performance shaping factor (PSF) taxonomies as well as research on the effect of PSFs on human error probability estimates in advanced control rooms (ACRs). It cannot be generally concluded that either analog or digitalized control rooms would be always better than the other. ACRs have the potential to offer error reducing and supportive features to the user, but may also introduce increased complexity and interface management tasks as well as potentially error-prone team working practices. Some effects seem universal, but most depend on the specific design. The main PSF categories presented in HRA methods and international guidelines seem still relevant in ACRs. Quantitative empirical studies show that especially training and experience, availability and quality of procedures as well as task type or complexity are important factors. However, digitalization changes the way in which the PSFs should be defined and measured, and the effects of PSFs on the error estimates may be different.
AB - The changes in the operating conditions of the main control room of nuclear power plants due to new digitalized human-system interfaces (HSIs) pose challenges to traditional human reliability analysis (HRA) methods. This paper reviews current knowledge about the effect of digital HSI on human behavior and reliability, relevant performance shaping factor (PSF) taxonomies as well as research on the effect of PSFs on human error probability estimates in advanced control rooms (ACRs). It cannot be generally concluded that either analog or digitalized control rooms would be always better than the other. ACRs have the potential to offer error reducing and supportive features to the user, but may also introduce increased complexity and interface management tasks as well as potentially error-prone team working practices. Some effects seem universal, but most depend on the specific design. The main PSF categories presented in HRA methods and international guidelines seem still relevant in ACRs. Quantitative empirical studies show that especially training and experience, availability and quality of procedures as well as task type or complexity are important factors. However, digitalization changes the way in which the PSFs should be defined and measured, and the effects of PSFs on the error estimates may be different.
KW - Advanced control room
KW - Digitalization
KW - Human reliability analysis
KW - Nuclear power plant
KW - Performance shaping factor
KW - Review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062905445&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ress.2019.03.022
DO - 10.1016/j.ress.2019.03.022
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85062905445
SN - 0951-8320
VL - 194
JO - Reliability Engineering and System Safety
JF - Reliability Engineering and System Safety
M1 - 106415
ER -