Effects of hot water and holds on fatigue of stainless steel

Jussi Solin, Jouni Alhainen, Ertugrul Karabaki, Wolfgang Mayinger

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Direct strain controlled LCF data for solid specimens is still very rare. In PVP2013-97500 and PVP2014-28465 we reported results for niobium stabilized X6CrNiNb1810mod steel (type 347) fatigued in 325°C and 200°C PWR water according to VGB water chemistry specification. New data in this paper further confirms the conclusions: we are unable to repeat as high Fen factors or short lives as predicted according to NUREG/CR-6909. The slowest strain rate used 4-10-6 in 325°C water would predict Fen > 12, i.e. laboratory specimen data below the current ASME design curve, but our results are superior for this steel generally used in German NPP's. However, the difference is not necessarily grade specific. Use of 100% relevant fabricated material batch and standard LCF methodology are regarded to play an important role. Notable hardening can be measured, when long duration holds in elevated temperatures are introduced between blocks of cyclic strains at lower temperatures. This is the case for thermal gradient loaded primary circuit components, e.g. the PWR pressurizer spray lines or surge line, which connects the pressurizer to primary coolant line. In PVP2011-57942 we reported improved endurances in fatigue tests aiming to roughly simulate steady state operation between fatigue transients in such NPP components. New test types have been introduced to generalize the results. Mechanisms of time and temperature dependent relaxation of fatigue damage and/or improvement of material fatigue performance during holds are not yet fully revealed, but the rate controlling thermal activation energy is below shown to be near that for vacancy and interstitial atom diffusion. This allows us to draft a thermodynamic prediction model Improved accuracy of fatigue assessment helps in focusing optimally scheduled nondestructive testing to the most relevant locations and maintaining high level of reliability without excessive cost and radiation doses for inspection personnel. This paper provides previously unpublished experimental results and proposes methods to improve transferability of laboratory test data to fatigue assessment of NPP components. The effects of material, water environment, temperature and service loading patterns are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationASME 2016 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference
Subtitle of host publicationCodes and Standards
PublisherAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers ASME
Number of pages13
Volume1A
ISBN (Print)978-0-7918-5035-0
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
MoE publication typeA4 Article in a conference publication
EventASME 2016 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference - Vancouver, Canada
Duration: 17 Jul 201621 Jul 2016

Conference

ConferenceASME 2016 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference
CountryCanada
CityVancouver
Period17/07/1621/07/16

Fingerprint

Stainless steel
Fatigue of materials
Water
Temperature
Steel
Fatigue damage
Niobium
Nondestructive examination
Coolants
Thermal gradients
Dosimetry
Vacancies
Hardening
Strain rate
Durability
Activation energy
Inspection
Thermodynamics
Personnel
Specifications

Keywords

  • Fatigue
  • Stainless steel
  • Hot Water

Cite this

Solin, J., Alhainen, J., Karabaki, E., & Mayinger, W. (2016). Effects of hot water and holds on fatigue of stainless steel. In ASME 2016 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference: Codes and Standards (Vol. 1A). [PVP2016-63291] American Society of Mechanical Engineers ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2016-63291
Solin, Jussi ; Alhainen, Jouni ; Karabaki, Ertugrul ; Mayinger, Wolfgang. / Effects of hot water and holds on fatigue of stainless steel. ASME 2016 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference: Codes and Standards. Vol. 1A American Society of Mechanical Engineers ASME, 2016.
@inproceedings{52109bc74f594531baf9d42e6beeeebd,
title = "Effects of hot water and holds on fatigue of stainless steel",
abstract = "Direct strain controlled LCF data for solid specimens is still very rare. In PVP2013-97500 and PVP2014-28465 we reported results for niobium stabilized X6CrNiNb1810mod steel (type 347) fatigued in 325°C and 200°C PWR water according to VGB water chemistry specification. New data in this paper further confirms the conclusions: we are unable to repeat as high Fen factors or short lives as predicted according to NUREG/CR-6909. The slowest strain rate used 4-10-6 in 325°C water would predict Fen > 12, i.e. laboratory specimen data below the current ASME design curve, but our results are superior for this steel generally used in German NPP's. However, the difference is not necessarily grade specific. Use of 100{\%} relevant fabricated material batch and standard LCF methodology are regarded to play an important role. Notable hardening can be measured, when long duration holds in elevated temperatures are introduced between blocks of cyclic strains at lower temperatures. This is the case for thermal gradient loaded primary circuit components, e.g. the PWR pressurizer spray lines or surge line, which connects the pressurizer to primary coolant line. In PVP2011-57942 we reported improved endurances in fatigue tests aiming to roughly simulate steady state operation between fatigue transients in such NPP components. New test types have been introduced to generalize the results. Mechanisms of time and temperature dependent relaxation of fatigue damage and/or improvement of material fatigue performance during holds are not yet fully revealed, but the rate controlling thermal activation energy is below shown to be near that for vacancy and interstitial atom diffusion. This allows us to draft a thermodynamic prediction model Improved accuracy of fatigue assessment helps in focusing optimally scheduled nondestructive testing to the most relevant locations and maintaining high level of reliability without excessive cost and radiation doses for inspection personnel. This paper provides previously unpublished experimental results and proposes methods to improve transferability of laboratory test data to fatigue assessment of NPP components. The effects of material, water environment, temperature and service loading patterns are discussed.",
keywords = "Fatigue, Stainless steel, Hot Water",
author = "Jussi Solin and Jouni Alhainen and Ertugrul Karabaki and Wolfgang Mayinger",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1115/PVP2016-63291",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-0-7918-5035-0",
volume = "1A",
booktitle = "ASME 2016 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference",
publisher = "American Society of Mechanical Engineers ASME",
address = "United States",

}

Solin, J, Alhainen, J, Karabaki, E & Mayinger, W 2016, Effects of hot water and holds on fatigue of stainless steel. in ASME 2016 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference: Codes and Standards. vol. 1A, PVP2016-63291, American Society of Mechanical Engineers ASME, ASME 2016 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Vancouver, Canada, 17/07/16. https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2016-63291

Effects of hot water and holds on fatigue of stainless steel. / Solin, Jussi; Alhainen, Jouni; Karabaki, Ertugrul; Mayinger, Wolfgang.

ASME 2016 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference: Codes and Standards. Vol. 1A American Society of Mechanical Engineers ASME, 2016. PVP2016-63291.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Effects of hot water and holds on fatigue of stainless steel

AU - Solin, Jussi

AU - Alhainen, Jouni

AU - Karabaki, Ertugrul

AU - Mayinger, Wolfgang

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Direct strain controlled LCF data for solid specimens is still very rare. In PVP2013-97500 and PVP2014-28465 we reported results for niobium stabilized X6CrNiNb1810mod steel (type 347) fatigued in 325°C and 200°C PWR water according to VGB water chemistry specification. New data in this paper further confirms the conclusions: we are unable to repeat as high Fen factors or short lives as predicted according to NUREG/CR-6909. The slowest strain rate used 4-10-6 in 325°C water would predict Fen > 12, i.e. laboratory specimen data below the current ASME design curve, but our results are superior for this steel generally used in German NPP's. However, the difference is not necessarily grade specific. Use of 100% relevant fabricated material batch and standard LCF methodology are regarded to play an important role. Notable hardening can be measured, when long duration holds in elevated temperatures are introduced between blocks of cyclic strains at lower temperatures. This is the case for thermal gradient loaded primary circuit components, e.g. the PWR pressurizer spray lines or surge line, which connects the pressurizer to primary coolant line. In PVP2011-57942 we reported improved endurances in fatigue tests aiming to roughly simulate steady state operation between fatigue transients in such NPP components. New test types have been introduced to generalize the results. Mechanisms of time and temperature dependent relaxation of fatigue damage and/or improvement of material fatigue performance during holds are not yet fully revealed, but the rate controlling thermal activation energy is below shown to be near that for vacancy and interstitial atom diffusion. This allows us to draft a thermodynamic prediction model Improved accuracy of fatigue assessment helps in focusing optimally scheduled nondestructive testing to the most relevant locations and maintaining high level of reliability without excessive cost and radiation doses for inspection personnel. This paper provides previously unpublished experimental results and proposes methods to improve transferability of laboratory test data to fatigue assessment of NPP components. The effects of material, water environment, temperature and service loading patterns are discussed.

AB - Direct strain controlled LCF data for solid specimens is still very rare. In PVP2013-97500 and PVP2014-28465 we reported results for niobium stabilized X6CrNiNb1810mod steel (type 347) fatigued in 325°C and 200°C PWR water according to VGB water chemistry specification. New data in this paper further confirms the conclusions: we are unable to repeat as high Fen factors or short lives as predicted according to NUREG/CR-6909. The slowest strain rate used 4-10-6 in 325°C water would predict Fen > 12, i.e. laboratory specimen data below the current ASME design curve, but our results are superior for this steel generally used in German NPP's. However, the difference is not necessarily grade specific. Use of 100% relevant fabricated material batch and standard LCF methodology are regarded to play an important role. Notable hardening can be measured, when long duration holds in elevated temperatures are introduced between blocks of cyclic strains at lower temperatures. This is the case for thermal gradient loaded primary circuit components, e.g. the PWR pressurizer spray lines or surge line, which connects the pressurizer to primary coolant line. In PVP2011-57942 we reported improved endurances in fatigue tests aiming to roughly simulate steady state operation between fatigue transients in such NPP components. New test types have been introduced to generalize the results. Mechanisms of time and temperature dependent relaxation of fatigue damage and/or improvement of material fatigue performance during holds are not yet fully revealed, but the rate controlling thermal activation energy is below shown to be near that for vacancy and interstitial atom diffusion. This allows us to draft a thermodynamic prediction model Improved accuracy of fatigue assessment helps in focusing optimally scheduled nondestructive testing to the most relevant locations and maintaining high level of reliability without excessive cost and radiation doses for inspection personnel. This paper provides previously unpublished experimental results and proposes methods to improve transferability of laboratory test data to fatigue assessment of NPP components. The effects of material, water environment, temperature and service loading patterns are discussed.

KW - Fatigue

KW - Stainless steel

KW - Hot Water

U2 - 10.1115/PVP2016-63291

DO - 10.1115/PVP2016-63291

M3 - Conference article in proceedings

SN - 978-0-7918-5035-0

VL - 1A

BT - ASME 2016 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference

PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers ASME

ER -

Solin J, Alhainen J, Karabaki E, Mayinger W. Effects of hot water and holds on fatigue of stainless steel. In ASME 2016 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference: Codes and Standards. Vol. 1A. American Society of Mechanical Engineers ASME. 2016. PVP2016-63291 https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2016-63291