Effects of nonplanar driver-side mirrors on lane-change crashes

Juha Luoma, Michael Flannagan, Michael Sivak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

In this quasi-experiment, we investigate the effects on lane-change crashes of nonplanar (spherical convex and multiradius) driver-side mirrors compared to planar mirrors. The analysis was based on 1,062 crashes reported from 1987 to 1998 to Finnish insurance companies for vehicles with passenger-side spherical convex mirrors and one of three types of driver-side mirror (planar, spherical convex, or multiradius). The results show that the mean effect of nonplanar mirrors compared to planar mirrors was a statistically significant decrease of 22.9% in lane-change crashes to the driver side. The effects of spherical convex and multiradius mirrors were not statistically different from each other. The nonplanar mirrors were beneficial especially for the high-risk driver groups, as well as for the lane-change situations and environmental conditions in which most lane-change crashes take place in the United States. These findings support the use of nonplanar driver-side mirrors. If drivers have problems with judgments of the speed and distance of approaching vehicles using nonplanar mirrors, the magnitude of this concern seems to be minimal compared to apparent benefits with regard to other mechanisms of lane-change crashes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)279-289
Number of pages11
JournalTransportation Human Factors
Volume2
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

driver
insurance company
environmental factors
experiment
Group

Cite this

Luoma, Juha ; Flannagan, Michael ; Sivak, Michael. / Effects of nonplanar driver-side mirrors on lane-change crashes. In: Transportation Human Factors. 2001 ; Vol. 2, No. 3. pp. 279-289.
@article{759351734f054e42b94d34a3fac32451,
title = "Effects of nonplanar driver-side mirrors on lane-change crashes",
abstract = "In this quasi-experiment, we investigate the effects on lane-change crashes of nonplanar (spherical convex and multiradius) driver-side mirrors compared to planar mirrors. The analysis was based on 1,062 crashes reported from 1987 to 1998 to Finnish insurance companies for vehicles with passenger-side spherical convex mirrors and one of three types of driver-side mirror (planar, spherical convex, or multiradius). The results show that the mean effect of nonplanar mirrors compared to planar mirrors was a statistically significant decrease of 22.9{\%} in lane-change crashes to the driver side. The effects of spherical convex and multiradius mirrors were not statistically different from each other. The nonplanar mirrors were beneficial especially for the high-risk driver groups, as well as for the lane-change situations and environmental conditions in which most lane-change crashes take place in the United States. These findings support the use of nonplanar driver-side mirrors. If drivers have problems with judgments of the speed and distance of approaching vehicles using nonplanar mirrors, the magnitude of this concern seems to be minimal compared to apparent benefits with regard to other mechanisms of lane-change crashes.",
author = "Juha Luoma and Michael Flannagan and Michael Sivak",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1207/STHF0203_7",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "279--289",
journal = "Transportation Human Factors",
issn = "1093-9741",
publisher = "Lawrence Erlbaum Associates",
number = "3",

}

Effects of nonplanar driver-side mirrors on lane-change crashes. / Luoma, Juha; Flannagan, Michael; Sivak, Michael.

In: Transportation Human Factors, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2001, p. 279-289.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of nonplanar driver-side mirrors on lane-change crashes

AU - Luoma, Juha

AU - Flannagan, Michael

AU - Sivak, Michael

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - In this quasi-experiment, we investigate the effects on lane-change crashes of nonplanar (spherical convex and multiradius) driver-side mirrors compared to planar mirrors. The analysis was based on 1,062 crashes reported from 1987 to 1998 to Finnish insurance companies for vehicles with passenger-side spherical convex mirrors and one of three types of driver-side mirror (planar, spherical convex, or multiradius). The results show that the mean effect of nonplanar mirrors compared to planar mirrors was a statistically significant decrease of 22.9% in lane-change crashes to the driver side. The effects of spherical convex and multiradius mirrors were not statistically different from each other. The nonplanar mirrors were beneficial especially for the high-risk driver groups, as well as for the lane-change situations and environmental conditions in which most lane-change crashes take place in the United States. These findings support the use of nonplanar driver-side mirrors. If drivers have problems with judgments of the speed and distance of approaching vehicles using nonplanar mirrors, the magnitude of this concern seems to be minimal compared to apparent benefits with regard to other mechanisms of lane-change crashes.

AB - In this quasi-experiment, we investigate the effects on lane-change crashes of nonplanar (spherical convex and multiradius) driver-side mirrors compared to planar mirrors. The analysis was based on 1,062 crashes reported from 1987 to 1998 to Finnish insurance companies for vehicles with passenger-side spherical convex mirrors and one of three types of driver-side mirror (planar, spherical convex, or multiradius). The results show that the mean effect of nonplanar mirrors compared to planar mirrors was a statistically significant decrease of 22.9% in lane-change crashes to the driver side. The effects of spherical convex and multiradius mirrors were not statistically different from each other. The nonplanar mirrors were beneficial especially for the high-risk driver groups, as well as for the lane-change situations and environmental conditions in which most lane-change crashes take place in the United States. These findings support the use of nonplanar driver-side mirrors. If drivers have problems with judgments of the speed and distance of approaching vehicles using nonplanar mirrors, the magnitude of this concern seems to be minimal compared to apparent benefits with regard to other mechanisms of lane-change crashes.

U2 - 10.1207/STHF0203_7

DO - 10.1207/STHF0203_7

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 279

EP - 289

JO - Transportation Human Factors

JF - Transportation Human Factors

SN - 1093-9741

IS - 3

ER -