Effects of three Fusarium species on the quality of barley and malt

Tuija Sarlin (Corresponding Author), Arja Laitila, Anja Pekkarinen, Auli Haikara

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    54 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    n this study, field-grown barley was artificially infected during the heading stage with three Fusarium species, F. culmorum, F. graminearum, and F. poae. The objective was to investigate possible differences among Fusarium species in terms of how severely they affect the quality of barley under Finnish field conditions. Moreover, we studied the effects of heavy infection on corresponding malt quality. Field trials were carried out with two different barley cultivars at two experimental farms. Spike samples collected during the growing period were analyzed for Fusarium infection and moisture content. Total precipitation and temperature data were collected daily. In addition, the harvested barley samples were analyzed for overall microbial flora and for mycotoxins. The infection rate and the amount of mycotoxins produced in the barley samples differed among species. F. graminearum was found to have the most negative effects on barley quality in terms of the studied parameters. Samples were malted in laboratory scale. All three Fusarium species increased the gushing potential of malt. Heavy fungal infection increased the enzyme activities in malt resulting in darker wort color and increased soluble nitrogen and free amino nitrogen content. However, high Fusarium contamination reduced lautering performance.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)43 - 49
    Number of pages7
    JournalJournal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists
    Volume63
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2005
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Keywords

    • Artificial inoculation, Field trials, Gushing, Malting, Mycotoxins

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of three <i>Fusarium</i> species on the quality of barley and malt'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this