TY - BOOK
T1 - Electricity market designs and flexibility
AU - Forsström, Juha
AU - Koreneff, Göran
AU - Similä, Lassi
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Rapid increase of varying renewable-based electricity
with low marginal cost is challenging the practices
applied in electricity markets. This report focuses on
how the electricity markets can be organised so that
flexibility is efficiently tackled, i.e. market design.
Thus, instead of technological means, attention is paid
to a question on how market system could contribute the
flexibility need and supply. According to the report,
current advanced electricity market designs offer
possibilities for trading flexible resources to some
extent. Furthermore, many of the shortcomings identified
in current market designs seem to relate to general
characteristics of electricity markets. Thus, making
explicit conclusions on adequate market design for
flexibility is challenging. However,capacity mechanisms,
increasing flexible components in market systems and
fundamentally novel type of market solutions are
discussed as potential directions for addressing
flexibility in market design.
Despite often presented solution for shortcomings of
current market design during the last few years,
according to the report, traditional capacity mechanisms
seem to have been designed to tackle the fundamental
shortcomings of electricity markets such as lack of
price-responsive demand, limitations in storing the
product, and vulnerability to market power during times
of high demand. Thus, it is seen possible that only
relying on traditional capacity mechanisms may not be
adequate for tackling the flexibility question. For
increasing flexible components in competitive electricity
markets, well-known measures include improvements in
intraday and realtime markets, more efficient and dynamic
prices, higher geographical or temporal resolution,
capacity prices, and demand response participation.
Whereas all these measures have potential to contribute
in addressing flexibility, the highest attention is paid
to analysis of novel type of two-market system presented
by Keay (2016), which is fundamentally designed to
address the flexibility issues in current operational
environment. Especially, its applicability in Nordic
electricity market is considered.
We present a thought experiment of how a separate
intermittent renewable market, basically a wind power
market in the Nordic system, could be made to work using
mainly the tools and market structures of the Finnish and
Nordic market we have already today. The basis for this
alternative is to split the markets with a firewall and
have a Wind System Operator managing the wind market. The
main point is to let all end-users in the wind market
purchase the production at a discount, but at the same
time directly be balance responsible.
AB - Rapid increase of varying renewable-based electricity
with low marginal cost is challenging the practices
applied in electricity markets. This report focuses on
how the electricity markets can be organised so that
flexibility is efficiently tackled, i.e. market design.
Thus, instead of technological means, attention is paid
to a question on how market system could contribute the
flexibility need and supply. According to the report,
current advanced electricity market designs offer
possibilities for trading flexible resources to some
extent. Furthermore, many of the shortcomings identified
in current market designs seem to relate to general
characteristics of electricity markets. Thus, making
explicit conclusions on adequate market design for
flexibility is challenging. However,capacity mechanisms,
increasing flexible components in market systems and
fundamentally novel type of market solutions are
discussed as potential directions for addressing
flexibility in market design.
Despite often presented solution for shortcomings of
current market design during the last few years,
according to the report, traditional capacity mechanisms
seem to have been designed to tackle the fundamental
shortcomings of electricity markets such as lack of
price-responsive demand, limitations in storing the
product, and vulnerability to market power during times
of high demand. Thus, it is seen possible that only
relying on traditional capacity mechanisms may not be
adequate for tackling the flexibility question. For
increasing flexible components in competitive electricity
markets, well-known measures include improvements in
intraday and realtime markets, more efficient and dynamic
prices, higher geographical or temporal resolution,
capacity prices, and demand response participation.
Whereas all these measures have potential to contribute
in addressing flexibility, the highest attention is paid
to analysis of novel type of two-market system presented
by Keay (2016), which is fundamentally designed to
address the flexibility issues in current operational
environment. Especially, its applicability in Nordic
electricity market is considered.
We present a thought experiment of how a separate
intermittent renewable market, basically a wind power
market in the Nordic system, could be made to work using
mainly the tools and market structures of the Finnish and
Nordic market we have already today. The basis for this
alternative is to split the markets with a firewall and
have a Wind System Operator managing the wind market. The
main point is to let all end-users in the wind market
purchase the production at a discount, but at the same
time directly be balance responsible.
KW - electricity market
KW - flexibility
M3 - Report
T3 - VTT Research Report
BT - Electricity market designs and flexibility
PB - VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
ER -