Elemental balance of SRF production process: Solid recovered fuel produced from municipal solid waste

Muhammad Nasrullah, Pasi Vainikka, Janne Hannula, Markku Hurme, Pekka Oinas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the production of solid recovered fuel (SRF), certain waste components have excessive influence on the quality of product. The proportion of rubber, plastic (hard) and certain textiles was found to be critical as to the elemental quality of SRF. The mass flow of rubber, plastic (hard) and textiles (to certain extent, especially synthetic textile) components from input waste stream into the output streams of SRF production was found to play the decisive role in defining the elemental quality of SRF. This paper presents the mass flow of polluting and potentially toxic elements (PTEs) in SRF production. The SRF was produced from municipal solid waste (MSW) through mechanical treatment (MT). The results showed that of the total input chlorine content to process, 55% was found in the SRF and 30% in reject material. Of the total input arsenic content, 30% was found in the SRF and 45% in fine fraction. In case of cadmium, lead and mercury, of their total input content to the process, 62%, 38% and 30%, respectively, was found in the SRF. Among the components of MSW, rubber material was identified as potential source of chlorine, containing 8.0 wt.% of chlorine. Plastic (hard) and textile components contained 1.6 and 1.1. wt.% of chlorine, respectively. Plastic (hard) contained higher lead and cadmium content compared with other waste components, i.e. 500 mg kg-1 and 9.0 mg kg-1, respectively.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)38-46
Number of pages9
JournalWaste Management and Research
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2016
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Municipal solid waste
Chlorine
Plastics
Textiles
Rubber
Cadmium
Synthetic textile fibers
Lead
Mercury (metal)
Arsenic

Keywords

  • Elemental balance
  • Household energy waste
  • Municipal solid waste
  • Polluting and potentially toxic elements
  • Solid recovered fuel

Cite this

Nasrullah, Muhammad ; Vainikka, Pasi ; Hannula, Janne ; Hurme, Markku ; Oinas, Pekka. / Elemental balance of SRF production process : Solid recovered fuel produced from municipal solid waste. In: Waste Management and Research. 2016 ; Vol. 34, No. 1. pp. 38-46.
@article{3048c581cff344ac9cf120aafd462aae,
title = "Elemental balance of SRF production process: Solid recovered fuel produced from municipal solid waste",
abstract = "In the production of solid recovered fuel (SRF), certain waste components have excessive influence on the quality of product. The proportion of rubber, plastic (hard) and certain textiles was found to be critical as to the elemental quality of SRF. The mass flow of rubber, plastic (hard) and textiles (to certain extent, especially synthetic textile) components from input waste stream into the output streams of SRF production was found to play the decisive role in defining the elemental quality of SRF. This paper presents the mass flow of polluting and potentially toxic elements (PTEs) in SRF production. The SRF was produced from municipal solid waste (MSW) through mechanical treatment (MT). The results showed that of the total input chlorine content to process, 55{\%} was found in the SRF and 30{\%} in reject material. Of the total input arsenic content, 30{\%} was found in the SRF and 45{\%} in fine fraction. In case of cadmium, lead and mercury, of their total input content to the process, 62{\%}, 38{\%} and 30{\%}, respectively, was found in the SRF. Among the components of MSW, rubber material was identified as potential source of chlorine, containing 8.0 wt.{\%} of chlorine. Plastic (hard) and textile components contained 1.6 and 1.1. wt.{\%} of chlorine, respectively. Plastic (hard) contained higher lead and cadmium content compared with other waste components, i.e. 500 mg kg-1 and 9.0 mg kg-1, respectively.",
keywords = "Elemental balance, Household energy waste, Municipal solid waste, Polluting and potentially toxic elements, Solid recovered fuel",
author = "Muhammad Nasrullah and Pasi Vainikka and Janne Hannula and Markku Hurme and Pekka Oinas",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0734242X15615697",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "38--46",
journal = "Waste Management and Research",
issn = "0734-242X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

Elemental balance of SRF production process : Solid recovered fuel produced from municipal solid waste. / Nasrullah, Muhammad; Vainikka, Pasi; Hannula, Janne; Hurme, Markku; Oinas, Pekka.

In: Waste Management and Research, Vol. 34, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 38-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Elemental balance of SRF production process

T2 - Solid recovered fuel produced from municipal solid waste

AU - Nasrullah, Muhammad

AU - Vainikka, Pasi

AU - Hannula, Janne

AU - Hurme, Markku

AU - Oinas, Pekka

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - In the production of solid recovered fuel (SRF), certain waste components have excessive influence on the quality of product. The proportion of rubber, plastic (hard) and certain textiles was found to be critical as to the elemental quality of SRF. The mass flow of rubber, plastic (hard) and textiles (to certain extent, especially synthetic textile) components from input waste stream into the output streams of SRF production was found to play the decisive role in defining the elemental quality of SRF. This paper presents the mass flow of polluting and potentially toxic elements (PTEs) in SRF production. The SRF was produced from municipal solid waste (MSW) through mechanical treatment (MT). The results showed that of the total input chlorine content to process, 55% was found in the SRF and 30% in reject material. Of the total input arsenic content, 30% was found in the SRF and 45% in fine fraction. In case of cadmium, lead and mercury, of their total input content to the process, 62%, 38% and 30%, respectively, was found in the SRF. Among the components of MSW, rubber material was identified as potential source of chlorine, containing 8.0 wt.% of chlorine. Plastic (hard) and textile components contained 1.6 and 1.1. wt.% of chlorine, respectively. Plastic (hard) contained higher lead and cadmium content compared with other waste components, i.e. 500 mg kg-1 and 9.0 mg kg-1, respectively.

AB - In the production of solid recovered fuel (SRF), certain waste components have excessive influence on the quality of product. The proportion of rubber, plastic (hard) and certain textiles was found to be critical as to the elemental quality of SRF. The mass flow of rubber, plastic (hard) and textiles (to certain extent, especially synthetic textile) components from input waste stream into the output streams of SRF production was found to play the decisive role in defining the elemental quality of SRF. This paper presents the mass flow of polluting and potentially toxic elements (PTEs) in SRF production. The SRF was produced from municipal solid waste (MSW) through mechanical treatment (MT). The results showed that of the total input chlorine content to process, 55% was found in the SRF and 30% in reject material. Of the total input arsenic content, 30% was found in the SRF and 45% in fine fraction. In case of cadmium, lead and mercury, of their total input content to the process, 62%, 38% and 30%, respectively, was found in the SRF. Among the components of MSW, rubber material was identified as potential source of chlorine, containing 8.0 wt.% of chlorine. Plastic (hard) and textile components contained 1.6 and 1.1. wt.% of chlorine, respectively. Plastic (hard) contained higher lead and cadmium content compared with other waste components, i.e. 500 mg kg-1 and 9.0 mg kg-1, respectively.

KW - Elemental balance

KW - Household energy waste

KW - Municipal solid waste

KW - Polluting and potentially toxic elements

KW - Solid recovered fuel

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958949263&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0734242X15615697

DO - 10.1177/0734242X15615697

M3 - Article

C2 - 26608898

AN - SCOPUS:84958949263

VL - 34

SP - 38

EP - 46

JO - Waste Management and Research

JF - Waste Management and Research

SN - 0734-242X

IS - 1

ER -