Emissions from bioenergy: improved accounting options and new policy needs

N. Bird, A. Cowie, D. Frieden, L. Gustavsson, N. Pena, Kim Pingoud, S. Rueter, R. Sathre, Sampo Soimakallio, A. Tuerk, S. Woess-Gallasch, G. Zanchi

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

Abstract

A recent paper by Searchinger [1] highlighted that Annex-I nations do not count CO2 emissions due to combustion of biomass in their commitments. This is because it is assumed that emissions from use of biomass are accounted for in the land use sector, where they should appear as reductions in carbon stocks. However, if the biomass comes from a non-Annex I country, these reductions are not counted within the Kyoto Protocol. Indeed, even Annex I countries do not necessarily fully account for carbon stock losses associated with bioenergy. This results in overestimating the mitigation benefits of bioenergy. The problem can be rectified by modifying the accounting system, adopting new policy measures or a combination of both. In this paper, we describe possible options and policy measures to improve the accounting of emissions from bioenergy. The pros and cons of the identified solutions are also discussed
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 18th EBCE
PublisherETA-Florence Renewable Energies
Pages98-102
ISBN (Print)978-88-89407-56-1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010
MoE publication typeA4 Article in a conference publication
Event18th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition - Lyon , France
Duration: 3 May 20107 May 2010

Conference

Conference18th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition
CountryFrance
CityLyon
Period3/05/107/05/10

Fingerprint

bioenergy
biomass
Kyoto Protocol
carbon
mitigation
combustion
land use
need
accounting
policy

Cite this

Bird, N., Cowie, A., Frieden, D., Gustavsson, L., Pena, N., Pingoud, K., ... Zanchi, G. (2010). Emissions from bioenergy: improved accounting options and new policy needs. In Proceedings of the 18th EBCE (pp. 98-102). ETA-Florence Renewable Energies. https://doi.org/10.5071/18thEUBCE2010-OC1.3
Bird, N. ; Cowie, A. ; Frieden, D. ; Gustavsson, L. ; Pena, N. ; Pingoud, Kim ; Rueter, S. ; Sathre, R. ; Soimakallio, Sampo ; Tuerk, A. ; Woess-Gallasch, S. ; Zanchi, G. / Emissions from bioenergy: improved accounting options and new policy needs. Proceedings of the 18th EBCE. ETA-Florence Renewable Energies, 2010. pp. 98-102
@inproceedings{441394eee1b940978076d3010b029c48,
title = "Emissions from bioenergy: improved accounting options and new policy needs",
abstract = "A recent paper by Searchinger [1] highlighted that Annex-I nations do not count CO2 emissions due to combustion of biomass in their commitments. This is because it is assumed that emissions from use of biomass are accounted for in the land use sector, where they should appear as reductions in carbon stocks. However, if the biomass comes from a non-Annex I country, these reductions are not counted within the Kyoto Protocol. Indeed, even Annex I countries do not necessarily fully account for carbon stock losses associated with bioenergy. This results in overestimating the mitigation benefits of bioenergy. The problem can be rectified by modifying the accounting system, adopting new policy measures or a combination of both. In this paper, we describe possible options and policy measures to improve the accounting of emissions from bioenergy. The pros and cons of the identified solutions are also discussed",
author = "N. Bird and A. Cowie and D. Frieden and L. Gustavsson and N. Pena and Kim Pingoud and S. Rueter and R. Sathre and Sampo Soimakallio and A. Tuerk and S. Woess-Gallasch and G. Zanchi",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.5071/18thEUBCE2010-OC1.3",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-88-89407-56-1",
pages = "98--102",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 18th EBCE",
publisher = "ETA-Florence Renewable Energies",
address = "Italy",

}

Bird, N, Cowie, A, Frieden, D, Gustavsson, L, Pena, N, Pingoud, K, Rueter, S, Sathre, R, Soimakallio, S, Tuerk, A, Woess-Gallasch, S & Zanchi, G 2010, Emissions from bioenergy: improved accounting options and new policy needs. in Proceedings of the 18th EBCE. ETA-Florence Renewable Energies, pp. 98-102, 18th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, Lyon , France, 3/05/10. https://doi.org/10.5071/18thEUBCE2010-OC1.3

Emissions from bioenergy: improved accounting options and new policy needs. / Bird, N.; Cowie, A.; Frieden, D.; Gustavsson, L.; Pena, N.; Pingoud, Kim; Rueter, S.; Sathre, R.; Soimakallio, Sampo; Tuerk, A.; Woess-Gallasch, S.; Zanchi, G.

Proceedings of the 18th EBCE. ETA-Florence Renewable Energies, 2010. p. 98-102.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Emissions from bioenergy: improved accounting options and new policy needs

AU - Bird, N.

AU - Cowie, A.

AU - Frieden, D.

AU - Gustavsson, L.

AU - Pena, N.

AU - Pingoud, Kim

AU - Rueter, S.

AU - Sathre, R.

AU - Soimakallio, Sampo

AU - Tuerk, A.

AU - Woess-Gallasch, S.

AU - Zanchi, G.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - A recent paper by Searchinger [1] highlighted that Annex-I nations do not count CO2 emissions due to combustion of biomass in their commitments. This is because it is assumed that emissions from use of biomass are accounted for in the land use sector, where they should appear as reductions in carbon stocks. However, if the biomass comes from a non-Annex I country, these reductions are not counted within the Kyoto Protocol. Indeed, even Annex I countries do not necessarily fully account for carbon stock losses associated with bioenergy. This results in overestimating the mitigation benefits of bioenergy. The problem can be rectified by modifying the accounting system, adopting new policy measures or a combination of both. In this paper, we describe possible options and policy measures to improve the accounting of emissions from bioenergy. The pros and cons of the identified solutions are also discussed

AB - A recent paper by Searchinger [1] highlighted that Annex-I nations do not count CO2 emissions due to combustion of biomass in their commitments. This is because it is assumed that emissions from use of biomass are accounted for in the land use sector, where they should appear as reductions in carbon stocks. However, if the biomass comes from a non-Annex I country, these reductions are not counted within the Kyoto Protocol. Indeed, even Annex I countries do not necessarily fully account for carbon stock losses associated with bioenergy. This results in overestimating the mitigation benefits of bioenergy. The problem can be rectified by modifying the accounting system, adopting new policy measures or a combination of both. In this paper, we describe possible options and policy measures to improve the accounting of emissions from bioenergy. The pros and cons of the identified solutions are also discussed

U2 - 10.5071/18thEUBCE2010-OC1.3

DO - 10.5071/18thEUBCE2010-OC1.3

M3 - Conference article in proceedings

SN - 978-88-89407-56-1

SP - 98

EP - 102

BT - Proceedings of the 18th EBCE

PB - ETA-Florence Renewable Energies

ER -

Bird N, Cowie A, Frieden D, Gustavsson L, Pena N, Pingoud K et al. Emissions from bioenergy: improved accounting options and new policy needs. In Proceedings of the 18th EBCE. ETA-Florence Renewable Energies. 2010. p. 98-102 https://doi.org/10.5071/18thEUBCE2010-OC1.3