Energy matching analysis of on-site micro-cogeneration for a single-family house with thermal and electrical tracking strategies

Sunliang Cao (Corresponding Author), Ayman Mohamed, Ala Hasan, Kai Siren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper conducts matching analysis for micro-cogeneration products with generated electrical power (Gelec) range 0.5-2.0 kWe and electrical to thermal ratio (ETTR) range 0.05-0.80 for a Finnish single-family house. Using the recently defined matching indices and evolved criteria, the matching capabilities are comprehensively assessed from both electrical and thermal heat matching aspects. Furthermore, both of the thermal tracking (with electrical grid feed-in) and electrical tracking (with thermal heat grid feed-in) strategies are considered. The simulation tool is TRNSYS 17. In terms of the averaged matching index under the thermal tracking strategy without battery, the best matching happens with a fuel cell with Gelec of 1.5 kWe and ETTR of 0.8, whereas under the condition with battery, the best matching happens with a Stirling engine or internal combustion engine with Gelec of 1.0 kWe and ETTR of 0.3. Under the electrical tracking strategy, the best matching happens with a Stirling engine with Gelec of 1.0-2.0 kWe and ETTR of 0.25. However, by putting certain preferences on the specific aspects of the matching capability, the best matching might be altered, which can be assessed using a weighted matching index. There is no linear relation between matching and primary energy consumption.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)351 - 363
JournalEnergy and Buildings
Volume68
Issue numberPARTA
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Stirling engines
Fuel cells
Hot Temperature
Internal combustion engines
Energy utilization

Keywords

  • building
  • electrical grid feed-in
  • energy matching analysis
  • micro combined heat and power
  • mismatch
  • thermal heat grid feed-in

Cite this

@article{4158d17b818d44b5ba2063d9612f941c,
title = "Energy matching analysis of on-site micro-cogeneration for a single-family house with thermal and electrical tracking strategies",
abstract = "This paper conducts matching analysis for micro-cogeneration products with generated electrical power (Gelec) range 0.5-2.0 kWe and electrical to thermal ratio (ETTR) range 0.05-0.80 for a Finnish single-family house. Using the recently defined matching indices and evolved criteria, the matching capabilities are comprehensively assessed from both electrical and thermal heat matching aspects. Furthermore, both of the thermal tracking (with electrical grid feed-in) and electrical tracking (with thermal heat grid feed-in) strategies are considered. The simulation tool is TRNSYS 17. In terms of the averaged matching index under the thermal tracking strategy without battery, the best matching happens with a fuel cell with Gelec of 1.5 kWe and ETTR of 0.8, whereas under the condition with battery, the best matching happens with a Stirling engine or internal combustion engine with Gelec of 1.0 kWe and ETTR of 0.3. Under the electrical tracking strategy, the best matching happens with a Stirling engine with Gelec of 1.0-2.0 kWe and ETTR of 0.25. However, by putting certain preferences on the specific aspects of the matching capability, the best matching might be altered, which can be assessed using a weighted matching index. There is no linear relation between matching and primary energy consumption.",
keywords = "building, electrical grid feed-in, energy matching analysis, micro combined heat and power, mismatch, thermal heat grid feed-in",
author = "Sunliang Cao and Ayman Mohamed and Ala Hasan and Kai Siren",
note = "Project code: 82593 - SA_OPTIENERGY",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.09.037",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "351 -- 363",
journal = "Energy and Buildings",
issn = "0378-7788",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "PARTA",

}

Energy matching analysis of on-site micro-cogeneration for a single-family house with thermal and electrical tracking strategies. / Cao, Sunliang (Corresponding Author); Mohamed, Ayman; Hasan, Ala; Siren, Kai.

In: Energy and Buildings, Vol. 68, No. PARTA, 2014, p. 351 - 363.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Energy matching analysis of on-site micro-cogeneration for a single-family house with thermal and electrical tracking strategies

AU - Cao, Sunliang

AU - Mohamed, Ayman

AU - Hasan, Ala

AU - Siren, Kai

N1 - Project code: 82593 - SA_OPTIENERGY

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This paper conducts matching analysis for micro-cogeneration products with generated electrical power (Gelec) range 0.5-2.0 kWe and electrical to thermal ratio (ETTR) range 0.05-0.80 for a Finnish single-family house. Using the recently defined matching indices and evolved criteria, the matching capabilities are comprehensively assessed from both electrical and thermal heat matching aspects. Furthermore, both of the thermal tracking (with electrical grid feed-in) and electrical tracking (with thermal heat grid feed-in) strategies are considered. The simulation tool is TRNSYS 17. In terms of the averaged matching index under the thermal tracking strategy without battery, the best matching happens with a fuel cell with Gelec of 1.5 kWe and ETTR of 0.8, whereas under the condition with battery, the best matching happens with a Stirling engine or internal combustion engine with Gelec of 1.0 kWe and ETTR of 0.3. Under the electrical tracking strategy, the best matching happens with a Stirling engine with Gelec of 1.0-2.0 kWe and ETTR of 0.25. However, by putting certain preferences on the specific aspects of the matching capability, the best matching might be altered, which can be assessed using a weighted matching index. There is no linear relation between matching and primary energy consumption.

AB - This paper conducts matching analysis for micro-cogeneration products with generated electrical power (Gelec) range 0.5-2.0 kWe and electrical to thermal ratio (ETTR) range 0.05-0.80 for a Finnish single-family house. Using the recently defined matching indices and evolved criteria, the matching capabilities are comprehensively assessed from both electrical and thermal heat matching aspects. Furthermore, both of the thermal tracking (with electrical grid feed-in) and electrical tracking (with thermal heat grid feed-in) strategies are considered. The simulation tool is TRNSYS 17. In terms of the averaged matching index under the thermal tracking strategy without battery, the best matching happens with a fuel cell with Gelec of 1.5 kWe and ETTR of 0.8, whereas under the condition with battery, the best matching happens with a Stirling engine or internal combustion engine with Gelec of 1.0 kWe and ETTR of 0.3. Under the electrical tracking strategy, the best matching happens with a Stirling engine with Gelec of 1.0-2.0 kWe and ETTR of 0.25. However, by putting certain preferences on the specific aspects of the matching capability, the best matching might be altered, which can be assessed using a weighted matching index. There is no linear relation between matching and primary energy consumption.

KW - building

KW - electrical grid feed-in

KW - energy matching analysis

KW - micro combined heat and power

KW - mismatch

KW - thermal heat grid feed-in

U2 - 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.09.037

DO - 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.09.037

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 351

EP - 363

JO - Energy and Buildings

JF - Energy and Buildings

SN - 0378-7788

IS - PARTA

ER -