Abstract
This paper conducts matching analysis for
micro-cogeneration products with generated electrical
power (Gelec) range 0.5-2.0 kWe and electrical to thermal
ratio (ETTR) range 0.05-0.80 for a Finnish single-family
house. Using the recently defined matching indices and
evolved criteria, the matching capabilities are
comprehensively assessed from both electrical and thermal
heat matching aspects. Furthermore, both of the thermal
tracking (with electrical grid feed-in) and electrical
tracking (with thermal heat grid feed-in) strategies are
considered. The simulation tool is TRNSYS 17. In terms of
the averaged matching index under the thermal tracking
strategy without battery, the best matching happens with
a fuel cell with Gelec of 1.5 kWe and ETTR of 0.8,
whereas under the condition with battery, the best
matching happens with a Stirling engine or internal
combustion engine with Gelec of 1.0 kWe and ETTR of 0.3.
Under the electrical tracking strategy, the best matching
happens with a Stirling engine with Gelec of 1.0-2.0 kWe
and ETTR of 0.25. However, by putting certain preferences
on the specific aspects of the matching capability, the
best matching might be altered, which can be assessed
using a weighted matching index. There is no linear
relation between matching and primary energy consumption.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 351 - 363 |
Journal | Energy and Buildings |
Volume | 68 |
Issue number | PARTA |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Keywords
- building
- electrical grid feed-in
- energy matching analysis
- micro combined heat and power
- mismatch
- thermal heat grid feed-in