Engineering and integration risks arising from advanced magnetic divertor configurations

R. Kembleton (Corresponding Author), G. Federici, R. Ambrosino, F. Maviglia, M. Siccinio, H. Reimerdes, S. Ha, S. Merriman, C. Bachmann, M. Suiko

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The divertor configuration defines the power exhaust capabilities of DEMO as one of the major key design parameters and sets a number of requirements on the tokamak layout, including port sizes, poloidal field coil positions, and size of toroidal field coils. It also requires a corresponding configuration of plasma-facing components (PFCs) and a remote handling scheme to be able to handle the cassettes and associated in-vessel components (IVC) the configuration requires. There is a risk that the baseline ITER-like single-null (SN) divertor configuration cannot meet the PFC technology limits regarding power exhaust and first wall protection while achieving the target plasma performance requirements of DEMO or a future fusion power plant. Alternative magnetic configurations – double-null, snowflake, X-, and super-X – exist and potentially offer solutions to these risks and a route to achievable power handling in DEMO. But these options impose significant changes on machine architecture, increase the machine complexity and affect remote handling and plasma physics and so an integrated approach must be taken to assessing the feasibility of these options. In this paper we describe the work programme to assess the requirements for incorporating these configurations into DEMO.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2281-2284
Number of pages4
JournalFusion Engineering and Design
Volume146
Issue numberPart B
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2019
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Plasmas
Facings
Power plants
Fusion reactions
Physics

Keywords

  • DEMO
  • Fusion power plant
  • System modelling
  • Systems studies
  • Technology choices

Cite this

Kembleton, R., Federici, G., Ambrosino, R., Maviglia, F., Siccinio, M., Reimerdes, H., ... Suiko, M. (2019). Engineering and integration risks arising from advanced magnetic divertor configurations. Fusion Engineering and Design, 146(Part B), 2281-2284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.03.172
Kembleton, R. ; Federici, G. ; Ambrosino, R. ; Maviglia, F. ; Siccinio, M. ; Reimerdes, H. ; Ha, S. ; Merriman, S. ; Bachmann, C. ; Suiko, M. / Engineering and integration risks arising from advanced magnetic divertor configurations. In: Fusion Engineering and Design. 2019 ; Vol. 146, No. Part B. pp. 2281-2284.
@article{c244ecff43cc4f27851a0eb6498c598f,
title = "Engineering and integration risks arising from advanced magnetic divertor configurations",
abstract = "The divertor configuration defines the power exhaust capabilities of DEMO as one of the major key design parameters and sets a number of requirements on the tokamak layout, including port sizes, poloidal field coil positions, and size of toroidal field coils. It also requires a corresponding configuration of plasma-facing components (PFCs) and a remote handling scheme to be able to handle the cassettes and associated in-vessel components (IVC) the configuration requires. There is a risk that the baseline ITER-like single-null (SN) divertor configuration cannot meet the PFC technology limits regarding power exhaust and first wall protection while achieving the target plasma performance requirements of DEMO or a future fusion power plant. Alternative magnetic configurations – double-null, snowflake, X-, and super-X – exist and potentially offer solutions to these risks and a route to achievable power handling in DEMO. But these options impose significant changes on machine architecture, increase the machine complexity and affect remote handling and plasma physics and so an integrated approach must be taken to assessing the feasibility of these options. In this paper we describe the work programme to assess the requirements for incorporating these configurations into DEMO.",
keywords = "DEMO, Fusion power plant, System modelling, Systems studies, Technology choices",
author = "R. Kembleton and G. Federici and R. Ambrosino and F. Maviglia and M. Siccinio and H. Reimerdes and S. Ha and S. Merriman and C. Bachmann and M. Suiko",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.03.172",
language = "English",
volume = "146",
pages = "2281--2284",
journal = "Fusion Engineering and Design",
issn = "0920-3796",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "Part B",

}

Kembleton, R, Federici, G, Ambrosino, R, Maviglia, F, Siccinio, M, Reimerdes, H, Ha, S, Merriman, S, Bachmann, C & Suiko, M 2019, 'Engineering and integration risks arising from advanced magnetic divertor configurations', Fusion Engineering and Design, vol. 146, no. Part B, pp. 2281-2284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.03.172

Engineering and integration risks arising from advanced magnetic divertor configurations. / Kembleton, R. (Corresponding Author); Federici, G.; Ambrosino, R.; Maviglia, F.; Siccinio, M.; Reimerdes, H.; Ha, S.; Merriman, S.; Bachmann, C.; Suiko, M.

In: Fusion Engineering and Design, Vol. 146, No. Part B, 01.09.2019, p. 2281-2284.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Engineering and integration risks arising from advanced magnetic divertor configurations

AU - Kembleton, R.

AU - Federici, G.

AU - Ambrosino, R.

AU - Maviglia, F.

AU - Siccinio, M.

AU - Reimerdes, H.

AU - Ha, S.

AU - Merriman, S.

AU - Bachmann, C.

AU - Suiko, M.

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - The divertor configuration defines the power exhaust capabilities of DEMO as one of the major key design parameters and sets a number of requirements on the tokamak layout, including port sizes, poloidal field coil positions, and size of toroidal field coils. It also requires a corresponding configuration of plasma-facing components (PFCs) and a remote handling scheme to be able to handle the cassettes and associated in-vessel components (IVC) the configuration requires. There is a risk that the baseline ITER-like single-null (SN) divertor configuration cannot meet the PFC technology limits regarding power exhaust and first wall protection while achieving the target plasma performance requirements of DEMO or a future fusion power plant. Alternative magnetic configurations – double-null, snowflake, X-, and super-X – exist and potentially offer solutions to these risks and a route to achievable power handling in DEMO. But these options impose significant changes on machine architecture, increase the machine complexity and affect remote handling and plasma physics and so an integrated approach must be taken to assessing the feasibility of these options. In this paper we describe the work programme to assess the requirements for incorporating these configurations into DEMO.

AB - The divertor configuration defines the power exhaust capabilities of DEMO as one of the major key design parameters and sets a number of requirements on the tokamak layout, including port sizes, poloidal field coil positions, and size of toroidal field coils. It also requires a corresponding configuration of plasma-facing components (PFCs) and a remote handling scheme to be able to handle the cassettes and associated in-vessel components (IVC) the configuration requires. There is a risk that the baseline ITER-like single-null (SN) divertor configuration cannot meet the PFC technology limits regarding power exhaust and first wall protection while achieving the target plasma performance requirements of DEMO or a future fusion power plant. Alternative magnetic configurations – double-null, snowflake, X-, and super-X – exist and potentially offer solutions to these risks and a route to achievable power handling in DEMO. But these options impose significant changes on machine architecture, increase the machine complexity and affect remote handling and plasma physics and so an integrated approach must be taken to assessing the feasibility of these options. In this paper we describe the work programme to assess the requirements for incorporating these configurations into DEMO.

KW - DEMO

KW - Fusion power plant

KW - System modelling

KW - Systems studies

KW - Technology choices

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063572386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.03.172

DO - 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.03.172

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85063572386

VL - 146

SP - 2281

EP - 2284

JO - Fusion Engineering and Design

JF - Fusion Engineering and Design

SN - 0920-3796

IS - Part B

ER -

Kembleton R, Federici G, Ambrosino R, Maviglia F, Siccinio M, Reimerdes H et al. Engineering and integration risks arising from advanced magnetic divertor configurations. Fusion Engineering and Design. 2019 Sep 1;146(Part B):2281-2284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.03.172