Environmental- and life cycle cost impact of reused steel structures: A case study

Sirje Vares (Corresponding author), Petr Hradil, Sakari Pulakka, Viorel Ungureanu, Michael Sansom

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The European steel sector has developed LCA assessment methods over many years, methods taking into account benefits of recycling. Unlike recycling, the reuse of steel structures extends the steel life with lower impacts, because steel recovery through melting process is not needed. Benefits based on the savings in natu-ral/virgin resources seem to be obvious by re-using materials, structures or buildings and giving them second, third or even fourth life. However, to show the benefits with the using a well justified methodological frame-work is not easy or straightforward as assumptions about the future reuse should be made. End of life pro-cesses, further processing, material identification and possible modification, and re-construction are the pro-cesses should be evaluated for the reuse case. Earlier studies have shown difficulties in the analysis of realistic economic impacts of reuse concepts. The number of possible alternatives is high and in worst cases, the reuse could lower the benefits compared to steel recycling. This theoretical case study is a part of PROGRESS project (Provisions for greater reuse of steel structures). The goal is to show the greenhouse gas impacts (as GWP) and life cycle costing (LCC) of the steel framed in-dustrial building for the first life cycle and for the case of steel frame and envelope reuse. The study pointing out benefits and loads and by discussing the meaning of methodological differences when using building Life Cycle Assessment methods (LCA).
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationLife-Cycle Analysis and Assessment in Civil Engineering
    Subtitle of host publicationTowards an Integrated Vision
    EditorsRobby Caspeele, Luc Taerwe, Dan M. Frangopol
    Place of PublicationGhent
    PublisherCRC Press
    Number of pages7
    Edition1
    ISBN (Electronic)978-1-315-22891-4
    ISBN (Print)978-1-138-62633-1
    Publication statusPublished - 10 Oct 2018
    MoE publication typeA4 Article in a conference publication
    Event6th International Symposium on Life-Cycle Civil Engineering, IALCCE 2018 - Ghent, Belgium
    Duration: 28 Oct 201831 Oct 2018

    Publication series

    SeriesLife-Cycle of Civil Engineering Systems
    ISSN2161-3907

    Conference

    Conference6th International Symposium on Life-Cycle Civil Engineering, IALCCE 2018
    CountryBelgium
    CityGhent
    Period28/10/1831/10/18

    Fingerprint

    steel structure
    life cycle
    steel
    assessment method
    cost
    recycling
    theoretical study
    economic impact
    savings
    greenhouse gas
    melting
    resource

    Cite this

    Vares, S., Hradil, P., Pulakka, S., Ungureanu, V., & Sansom, M. (2018). Environmental- and life cycle cost impact of reused steel structures: A case study. In R. Caspeele, L. Taerwe, & D. M. Frangopol (Eds.), Life-Cycle Analysis and Assessment in Civil Engineering: Towards an Integrated Vision (1 ed.). Ghent: CRC Press. Life-Cycle of Civil Engineering Systems
    Vares, Sirje ; Hradil, Petr ; Pulakka, Sakari ; Ungureanu, Viorel ; Sansom, Michael. / Environmental- and life cycle cost impact of reused steel structures : A case study. Life-Cycle Analysis and Assessment in Civil Engineering: Towards an Integrated Vision. editor / Robby Caspeele ; Luc Taerwe ; Dan M. Frangopol. 1. ed. Ghent : CRC Press, 2018. (Life-Cycle of Civil Engineering Systems).
    @inproceedings{2abdcbccdc0b466ea6447d7fbc343e2f,
    title = "Environmental- and life cycle cost impact of reused steel structures: A case study",
    abstract = "The European steel sector has developed LCA assessment methods over many years, methods taking into account benefits of recycling. Unlike recycling, the reuse of steel structures extends the steel life with lower impacts, because steel recovery through melting process is not needed. Benefits based on the savings in natu-ral/virgin resources seem to be obvious by re-using materials, structures or buildings and giving them second, third or even fourth life. However, to show the benefits with the using a well justified methodological frame-work is not easy or straightforward as assumptions about the future reuse should be made. End of life pro-cesses, further processing, material identification and possible modification, and re-construction are the pro-cesses should be evaluated for the reuse case. Earlier studies have shown difficulties in the analysis of realistic economic impacts of reuse concepts. The number of possible alternatives is high and in worst cases, the reuse could lower the benefits compared to steel recycling. This theoretical case study is a part of PROGRESS project (Provisions for greater reuse of steel structures). The goal is to show the greenhouse gas impacts (as GWP) and life cycle costing (LCC) of the steel framed in-dustrial building for the first life cycle and for the case of steel frame and envelope reuse. The study pointing out benefits and loads and by discussing the meaning of methodological differences when using building Life Cycle Assessment methods (LCA).",
    author = "Sirje Vares and Petr Hradil and Sakari Pulakka and Viorel Ungureanu and Michael Sansom",
    year = "2018",
    month = "10",
    day = "10",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "978-1-138-62633-1",
    series = "Life-Cycle of Civil Engineering Systems",
    publisher = "CRC Press",
    editor = "Robby Caspeele and Luc Taerwe and Frangopol, {Dan M.}",
    booktitle = "Life-Cycle Analysis and Assessment in Civil Engineering",
    address = "United States",
    edition = "1",

    }

    Vares, S, Hradil, P, Pulakka, S, Ungureanu, V & Sansom, M 2018, Environmental- and life cycle cost impact of reused steel structures: A case study. in R Caspeele, L Taerwe & DM Frangopol (eds), Life-Cycle Analysis and Assessment in Civil Engineering: Towards an Integrated Vision. 1 edn, CRC Press, Ghent, Life-Cycle of Civil Engineering Systems, 6th International Symposium on Life-Cycle Civil Engineering, IALCCE 2018, Ghent, Belgium, 28/10/18.

    Environmental- and life cycle cost impact of reused steel structures : A case study. / Vares, Sirje (Corresponding author); Hradil, Petr; Pulakka, Sakari; Ungureanu, Viorel; Sansom, Michael.

    Life-Cycle Analysis and Assessment in Civil Engineering: Towards an Integrated Vision. ed. / Robby Caspeele; Luc Taerwe; Dan M. Frangopol. 1. ed. Ghent : CRC Press, 2018. (Life-Cycle of Civil Engineering Systems).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Environmental- and life cycle cost impact of reused steel structures

    T2 - A case study

    AU - Vares, Sirje

    AU - Hradil, Petr

    AU - Pulakka, Sakari

    AU - Ungureanu, Viorel

    AU - Sansom, Michael

    PY - 2018/10/10

    Y1 - 2018/10/10

    N2 - The European steel sector has developed LCA assessment methods over many years, methods taking into account benefits of recycling. Unlike recycling, the reuse of steel structures extends the steel life with lower impacts, because steel recovery through melting process is not needed. Benefits based on the savings in natu-ral/virgin resources seem to be obvious by re-using materials, structures or buildings and giving them second, third or even fourth life. However, to show the benefits with the using a well justified methodological frame-work is not easy or straightforward as assumptions about the future reuse should be made. End of life pro-cesses, further processing, material identification and possible modification, and re-construction are the pro-cesses should be evaluated for the reuse case. Earlier studies have shown difficulties in the analysis of realistic economic impacts of reuse concepts. The number of possible alternatives is high and in worst cases, the reuse could lower the benefits compared to steel recycling. This theoretical case study is a part of PROGRESS project (Provisions for greater reuse of steel structures). The goal is to show the greenhouse gas impacts (as GWP) and life cycle costing (LCC) of the steel framed in-dustrial building for the first life cycle and for the case of steel frame and envelope reuse. The study pointing out benefits and loads and by discussing the meaning of methodological differences when using building Life Cycle Assessment methods (LCA).

    AB - The European steel sector has developed LCA assessment methods over many years, methods taking into account benefits of recycling. Unlike recycling, the reuse of steel structures extends the steel life with lower impacts, because steel recovery through melting process is not needed. Benefits based on the savings in natu-ral/virgin resources seem to be obvious by re-using materials, structures or buildings and giving them second, third or even fourth life. However, to show the benefits with the using a well justified methodological frame-work is not easy or straightforward as assumptions about the future reuse should be made. End of life pro-cesses, further processing, material identification and possible modification, and re-construction are the pro-cesses should be evaluated for the reuse case. Earlier studies have shown difficulties in the analysis of realistic economic impacts of reuse concepts. The number of possible alternatives is high and in worst cases, the reuse could lower the benefits compared to steel recycling. This theoretical case study is a part of PROGRESS project (Provisions for greater reuse of steel structures). The goal is to show the greenhouse gas impacts (as GWP) and life cycle costing (LCC) of the steel framed in-dustrial building for the first life cycle and for the case of steel frame and envelope reuse. The study pointing out benefits and loads and by discussing the meaning of methodological differences when using building Life Cycle Assessment methods (LCA).

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063969934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Conference article in proceedings

    AN - SCOPUS:85063969934

    SN - 978-1-138-62633-1

    T3 - Life-Cycle of Civil Engineering Systems

    BT - Life-Cycle Analysis and Assessment in Civil Engineering

    A2 - Caspeele, Robby

    A2 - Taerwe, Luc

    A2 - Frangopol, Dan M.

    PB - CRC Press

    CY - Ghent

    ER -

    Vares S, Hradil P, Pulakka S, Ungureanu V, Sansom M. Environmental- and life cycle cost impact of reused steel structures: A case study. In Caspeele R, Taerwe L, Frangopol DM, editors, Life-Cycle Analysis and Assessment in Civil Engineering: Towards an Integrated Vision. 1 ed. Ghent: CRC Press. 2018. (Life-Cycle of Civil Engineering Systems).