Equal Opportunity for Biomass in Greenhouse Gas Accounting of CO2 Capture and Storage

A Step Towards More Cost-Effective Climate Change Mitigation Regimes

S. Grönkvist (Corresponding Author), K. Möllersten, Kim Pingoud

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Carbon dioxide capture and permanent storage (CCS) is one of the most frequently discussed technologies with the potential to mitigate climate change. The natural target for CCS has been the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from fossil energy sources. However, CCS has also been suggested in combination with biomass during recent years. Given that the impact on the earth's radiative balance is the same whether CO2 emissions of a fossil or a biomass origin are captured and stored away from the atmosphere, we argue that an equal reward should be given for the CCS, independent of the origin of the CO2. The guidelines that provide assistance for the national greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting under the Kyoto Protocol have not considered CCS from biomass (biotic CCS) and it appears that it is not possible to receive emission credits for biotic CCS under the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol, i.e., 2008–2012. We argue that it would be unwise to exclude this GHG mitigation alternative from the competition with other GHG mitigation options. We also propose a feasible approach as to how emission credits for biotic CCS could be included within a future accounting framework.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1083-1096
Number of pages14
JournalMitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
Volume11
Issue number5-6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

greenhouse gas
Kyoto Protocol
biomass
cost
mitigation
carbon dioxide
fossil
climate change
climate change mitigation
atmosphere
accounting
credit

Keywords

  • biomass
  • carbon capture
  • carbon dioxide capture
  • carbon storage
  • CCS
  • greenhouse gases
  • ghg accounting
  • carbon accounting

Cite this

@article{672bc85544ee47c79ea29550199c966a,
title = "Equal Opportunity for Biomass in Greenhouse Gas Accounting of CO2 Capture and Storage: A Step Towards More Cost-Effective Climate Change Mitigation Regimes",
abstract = "Carbon dioxide capture and permanent storage (CCS) is one of the most frequently discussed technologies with the potential to mitigate climate change. The natural target for CCS has been the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from fossil energy sources. However, CCS has also been suggested in combination with biomass during recent years. Given that the impact on the earth's radiative balance is the same whether CO2 emissions of a fossil or a biomass origin are captured and stored away from the atmosphere, we argue that an equal reward should be given for the CCS, independent of the origin of the CO2. The guidelines that provide assistance for the national greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting under the Kyoto Protocol have not considered CCS from biomass (biotic CCS) and it appears that it is not possible to receive emission credits for biotic CCS under the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol, i.e., 2008–2012. We argue that it would be unwise to exclude this GHG mitigation alternative from the competition with other GHG mitigation options. We also propose a feasible approach as to how emission credits for biotic CCS could be included within a future accounting framework.",
keywords = "biomass, carbon capture, carbon dioxide capture, carbon storage, CCS, greenhouse gases, ghg accounting, carbon accounting",
author = "S. Gr{\"o}nkvist and K. M{\"o}llersten and Kim Pingoud",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1007/s11027-006-9034-9",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "1083--1096",
journal = "Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change",
issn = "1381-2386",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "5-6",

}

Equal Opportunity for Biomass in Greenhouse Gas Accounting of CO2 Capture and Storage : A Step Towards More Cost-Effective Climate Change Mitigation Regimes. / Grönkvist, S. (Corresponding Author); Möllersten, K.; Pingoud, Kim.

In: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Vol. 11, No. 5-6, 2006, p. 1083-1096.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Equal Opportunity for Biomass in Greenhouse Gas Accounting of CO2 Capture and Storage

T2 - A Step Towards More Cost-Effective Climate Change Mitigation Regimes

AU - Grönkvist, S.

AU - Möllersten, K.

AU - Pingoud, Kim

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Carbon dioxide capture and permanent storage (CCS) is one of the most frequently discussed technologies with the potential to mitigate climate change. The natural target for CCS has been the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from fossil energy sources. However, CCS has also been suggested in combination with biomass during recent years. Given that the impact on the earth's radiative balance is the same whether CO2 emissions of a fossil or a biomass origin are captured and stored away from the atmosphere, we argue that an equal reward should be given for the CCS, independent of the origin of the CO2. The guidelines that provide assistance for the national greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting under the Kyoto Protocol have not considered CCS from biomass (biotic CCS) and it appears that it is not possible to receive emission credits for biotic CCS under the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol, i.e., 2008–2012. We argue that it would be unwise to exclude this GHG mitigation alternative from the competition with other GHG mitigation options. We also propose a feasible approach as to how emission credits for biotic CCS could be included within a future accounting framework.

AB - Carbon dioxide capture and permanent storage (CCS) is one of the most frequently discussed technologies with the potential to mitigate climate change. The natural target for CCS has been the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from fossil energy sources. However, CCS has also been suggested in combination with biomass during recent years. Given that the impact on the earth's radiative balance is the same whether CO2 emissions of a fossil or a biomass origin are captured and stored away from the atmosphere, we argue that an equal reward should be given for the CCS, independent of the origin of the CO2. The guidelines that provide assistance for the national greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting under the Kyoto Protocol have not considered CCS from biomass (biotic CCS) and it appears that it is not possible to receive emission credits for biotic CCS under the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol, i.e., 2008–2012. We argue that it would be unwise to exclude this GHG mitigation alternative from the competition with other GHG mitigation options. We also propose a feasible approach as to how emission credits for biotic CCS could be included within a future accounting framework.

KW - biomass

KW - carbon capture

KW - carbon dioxide capture

KW - carbon storage

KW - CCS

KW - greenhouse gases

KW - ghg accounting

KW - carbon accounting

U2 - 10.1007/s11027-006-9034-9

DO - 10.1007/s11027-006-9034-9

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 1083

EP - 1096

JO - Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change

JF - Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change

SN - 1381-2386

IS - 5-6

ER -