TY - JOUR
T1 - Erratum
T2 - High-frequency mechanical excitation of a silicon nanostring with piezoelectric aluminum nitride layers (Physical Review Applied (2020) 14 (014054) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.014054)
AU - Pitanti, Alessandro
AU - Makkonen, Tapani
AU - Colombano, Martin F.
AU - Zanotto, Simone
AU - Vicarelli, Leonardo
AU - Cecchini, Marco
AU - Griol, Amadeu
AU - Navarro-Urrios, Daniel
AU - Sotomayor-Torres, Clivia
AU - Martinez, Alejandro
AU - Ahopelto, Jouni
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - We report on a minor correction in our article: “High frequency mechanical excitation of a silicon nanostring with piezoelectric aluminum nitride layers”. The sentence at page 4, starting at line 13 to the last, contains a mistake in the rescaling factor to compare single-frequency to multi-frequency measurements. The corrected sentence reads as: The total, integrated voltage set in each window is of 3.5 VRMS; to compare the result with the one given by the monochromatic, single frequency 1 GHz tone, one should consider that the signal is normalized considering the peak envelope power voltage equally spread on each excitation window. Scaling opportunely the single frequency measurement for a factor v2/n times the voltages ratio, the ~ 300 pm displacement amplitude at 1 GHz reported in Fig. 3 should then translate to roughly 7 pm at the same frequency. Note that our correction does not affect the figures, the results nor the conclusions of our manuscript.
AB - We report on a minor correction in our article: “High frequency mechanical excitation of a silicon nanostring with piezoelectric aluminum nitride layers”. The sentence at page 4, starting at line 13 to the last, contains a mistake in the rescaling factor to compare single-frequency to multi-frequency measurements. The corrected sentence reads as: The total, integrated voltage set in each window is of 3.5 VRMS; to compare the result with the one given by the monochromatic, single frequency 1 GHz tone, one should consider that the signal is normalized considering the peak envelope power voltage equally spread on each excitation window. Scaling opportunely the single frequency measurement for a factor v2/n times the voltages ratio, the ~ 300 pm displacement amplitude at 1 GHz reported in Fig. 3 should then translate to roughly 7 pm at the same frequency. Note that our correction does not affect the figures, the results nor the conclusions of our manuscript.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127799575&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.17.039901
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.17.039901
M3 - Other journal contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85127799575
SN - 2331-7019
VL - 17
JO - Physical Review Applied
JF - Physical Review Applied
IS - 3
M1 - 039901
ER -