Abstract
Life cycle assessment (LCA) is one of the most
established quantitative tools for environmental impact
assessment of products. To be able to provide support to
environmentally-aware decision makers on environmental
impacts of biomass value-chains, the scope of LCA
methodology needs to be augmented to cover landuse
related environmental impacts. This dissertation focuses
on analysing and discussing potential impact assessment
methods, conceptual models and environmental indicators
that have been proposed to be implemented into the LCA
framework for impacts of land use. The applicability of
proposed indicators and impact assessment frameworks is
tested from practitioners' perspective, especially
focusing on forest biomass value chains. The impacts of
land use on biodiversity, resource depletion, climate
change and other ecosystem services is analysed and
discussed and the interplay in between value choices in
LCA modelling and the decision-making situations to be
supported is critically discussed.
It was found out that land use impact indicators are
necessary in LCA in highlighting differences in impacts
from distinct land use classes. However, many open
questions remain on certainty of highlighting actual
impacts of land use, especially regarding impacts of
managed forest land use on biodiversity and ecosystem
services such as water regulation and purification.
The climate impact of energy use of boreal stemwood was
found to be higher in the short term and lower in the
long-term in comparison with fossil fuels that emit
identical amount of CO2 in combustion, due to changes
implied to forest C stocks. The climate impacts of energy
use of boreal stemwood were found to be higher than the
previous estimates suggest on forest residues and stumps.
The product lifetime was found to have much higher
influence on the climate impacts of woodbased value
chains than the origin of stemwood either from thinnings
or final fellings. Climate neutrality seems to be likely
only in the case when almost all the carbon of harvested
wood is stored in long-lived wooden products.
In the current form, the land use impacts cannot be
modelled with a high degree of certainty nor communicated
with adequate level of clarity to decision makers. The
academia needs to keep on improving the modelling
framework, and more importantly, clearly communicate to
decision-makers the limited certainty on whether land-use
intensive activities can help in meeting the strict
mitigation targets we are globally facing.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Qualification | Doctor Degree |
Awarding Institution |
|
Supervisors/Advisors |
|
Award date | 6 Mar 2015 |
Place of Publication | Espoo |
Publisher | |
Print ISBNs | 978-951-38-8208-2 |
Electronic ISBNs | 978-951-38-8209-9 |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |
MoE publication type | G5 Doctoral dissertation (article) |
Keywords
- life cycle assessment
- environmental impacts of land use
- biodiversity
- resource depletion
- ecosystem services
- climate regulation
- decision-support