Evaluating potential investments in new technologies

Balancing assessments of potential benefits with assessments of potential disbenefits, reliability and utilization

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In recent years, the assessment of intangible benefits has become an explicit requirement of investment evaluation techniques. By contrast, assessments of three factors which can prevent the realization of any benefits have not become an explicit requirement. Those three factors are disbenefits, reliability and utilization. The importance of these factors may sometimes be identified prior to investment evaluation when exploratory methods such as contingency planning are used. However, evidence presented in this paper suggests that these three factors are often overlooked. Further, the evidence presented in this paper suggests that investment performance often suffers as a result. Accordingly, it is argued that investment evaluations need to be balanced by making assessments of disbenefits, reliability and utilization an explicit requirement. This argument is supported by reporting of experiences from action research. These experiences indicate that investment evaluations can be balanced by making assessments of disbenefits, reliability and utilization an explicit requirement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1197-1218
Number of pages22
JournalCritical Perspectives on Accounting
Volume19
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2008
MoE publication typeNot Eligible

Fingerprint

new technology
utilization
evaluation
contingency
action research
evidence
experience
Factors
Investment evaluation
planning
performance

Keywords

  • Disbenefits
  • Investment evaluation techniques
  • Reliability
  • Utilization

Cite this

@article{ef353656f1c94401b782ea6bd7513317,
title = "Evaluating potential investments in new technologies: Balancing assessments of potential benefits with assessments of potential disbenefits, reliability and utilization",
abstract = "In recent years, the assessment of intangible benefits has become an explicit requirement of investment evaluation techniques. By contrast, assessments of three factors which can prevent the realization of any benefits have not become an explicit requirement. Those three factors are disbenefits, reliability and utilization. The importance of these factors may sometimes be identified prior to investment evaluation when exploratory methods such as contingency planning are used. However, evidence presented in this paper suggests that these three factors are often overlooked. Further, the evidence presented in this paper suggests that investment performance often suffers as a result. Accordingly, it is argued that investment evaluations need to be balanced by making assessments of disbenefits, reliability and utilization an explicit requirement. This argument is supported by reporting of experiences from action research. These experiences indicate that investment evaluations can be balanced by making assessments of disbenefits, reliability and utilization an explicit requirement.",
keywords = "Disbenefits, Investment evaluation techniques, Reliability, Utilization",
author = "Stephen Fox",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cpa.2007.11.002",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "1197--1218",
journal = "Critical Perspectives on Accounting",
issn = "1045-2354",
publisher = "Academic Press",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating potential investments in new technologies

T2 - Balancing assessments of potential benefits with assessments of potential disbenefits, reliability and utilization

AU - Fox, Stephen

PY - 2008/12/1

Y1 - 2008/12/1

N2 - In recent years, the assessment of intangible benefits has become an explicit requirement of investment evaluation techniques. By contrast, assessments of three factors which can prevent the realization of any benefits have not become an explicit requirement. Those three factors are disbenefits, reliability and utilization. The importance of these factors may sometimes be identified prior to investment evaluation when exploratory methods such as contingency planning are used. However, evidence presented in this paper suggests that these three factors are often overlooked. Further, the evidence presented in this paper suggests that investment performance often suffers as a result. Accordingly, it is argued that investment evaluations need to be balanced by making assessments of disbenefits, reliability and utilization an explicit requirement. This argument is supported by reporting of experiences from action research. These experiences indicate that investment evaluations can be balanced by making assessments of disbenefits, reliability and utilization an explicit requirement.

AB - In recent years, the assessment of intangible benefits has become an explicit requirement of investment evaluation techniques. By contrast, assessments of three factors which can prevent the realization of any benefits have not become an explicit requirement. Those three factors are disbenefits, reliability and utilization. The importance of these factors may sometimes be identified prior to investment evaluation when exploratory methods such as contingency planning are used. However, evidence presented in this paper suggests that these three factors are often overlooked. Further, the evidence presented in this paper suggests that investment performance often suffers as a result. Accordingly, it is argued that investment evaluations need to be balanced by making assessments of disbenefits, reliability and utilization an explicit requirement. This argument is supported by reporting of experiences from action research. These experiences indicate that investment evaluations can be balanced by making assessments of disbenefits, reliability and utilization an explicit requirement.

KW - Disbenefits

KW - Investment evaluation techniques

KW - Reliability

KW - Utilization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=55549092076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cpa.2007.11.002

DO - 10.1016/j.cpa.2007.11.002

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 1197

EP - 1218

JO - Critical Perspectives on Accounting

JF - Critical Perspectives on Accounting

SN - 1045-2354

IS - 8

ER -