Evaluation methods for urban transportation plans

Veli Himanen

Research output: Book/ReportReport

Abstract

A conceptual picture of traffic and its partial factors is formulated as a starting point for an evaluation method for urban transportation plans. The accuracy of the calculation methods is clarified and the properties of the different evaluation methods are studied. With regard to the planning process the development of the evaluation method is limited thus that we start from a situation where the plans to be compared already exist. Thus it is not necessary to examine problem setting, formulation of alternatives and goal setting. The consequences of traffic can he split up into five groups: freedom of movement, safety, environmental effects, money and energy. The consequences can further be studied at local, national and global level from various viewpoints. The examination can be made on the basis of measured or calculated values, or from the examiner's subjective viewpoint. In addition to these direct consequences traffic has also indirect influences on other systems. Cost-benefit analysis contains theoretical weaknesses in the evaluation of the consequences in monetary terms. In multicriteria analysis the corresponding weaknesses are due to the artificiality of the formulation of goals and weights. Consequence analysis does not have the same weaknesses. In consequence analysis the impacts of traffic are presented from the viewpoint of different groups. The influences of the plan on other systems are also studied. A summary of the analysis is drafted for decision-making. The summary compares the gains obtained with the losses. The report includes instructions for and an example of the use of consequence analysis.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationEspoo
PublisherVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
Number of pages80
ISBN (Print)951-38-2221-4
Publication statusPublished - 1985
MoE publication typeD4 Published development or research report or study

Publication series

SeriesValtion teknillinen tutkimuskeskus. Tiedotteita
Number346
ISSN0358-5085

Fingerprint

Urban transportation
Cost benefit analysis
Environmental impact
Decision making
Planning

Keywords

  • traffic
  • traffic planning
  • transportation
  • evaluation
  • methods
  • traffic safety
  • traffic surveys

Cite this

Himanen, V. (1985). Evaluation methods for urban transportation plans. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland. Valtion teknillinen tutkimuskeskus. Tiedotteita, No. 346
Himanen, Veli. / Evaluation methods for urban transportation plans. Espoo : VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 1985. 80 p. (Valtion teknillinen tutkimuskeskus. Tiedotteita; No. 346).
@book{2ea4b0c3e12840859400ce2618fb998a,
title = "Evaluation methods for urban transportation plans",
abstract = "A conceptual picture of traffic and its partial factors is formulated as a starting point for an evaluation method for urban transportation plans. The accuracy of the calculation methods is clarified and the properties of the different evaluation methods are studied. With regard to the planning process the development of the evaluation method is limited thus that we start from a situation where the plans to be compared already exist. Thus it is not necessary to examine problem setting, formulation of alternatives and goal setting. The consequences of traffic can he split up into five groups: freedom of movement, safety, environmental effects, money and energy. The consequences can further be studied at local, national and global level from various viewpoints. The examination can be made on the basis of measured or calculated values, or from the examiner's subjective viewpoint. In addition to these direct consequences traffic has also indirect influences on other systems. Cost-benefit analysis contains theoretical weaknesses in the evaluation of the consequences in monetary terms. In multicriteria analysis the corresponding weaknesses are due to the artificiality of the formulation of goals and weights. Consequence analysis does not have the same weaknesses. In consequence analysis the impacts of traffic are presented from the viewpoint of different groups. The influences of the plan on other systems are also studied. A summary of the analysis is drafted for decision-making. The summary compares the gains obtained with the losses. The report includes instructions for and an example of the use of consequence analysis.",
keywords = "traffic, traffic planning, transportation, evaluation, methods, traffic safety, traffic surveys",
author = "Veli Himanen",
year = "1985",
language = "English",
isbn = "951-38-2221-4",
series = "Valtion teknillinen tutkimuskeskus. Tiedotteita",
publisher = "VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland",
number = "346",
address = "Finland",

}

Himanen, V 1985, Evaluation methods for urban transportation plans. Valtion teknillinen tutkimuskeskus. Tiedotteita, no. 346, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo.

Evaluation methods for urban transportation plans. / Himanen, Veli.

Espoo : VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 1985. 80 p. (Valtion teknillinen tutkimuskeskus. Tiedotteita; No. 346).

Research output: Book/ReportReport

TY - BOOK

T1 - Evaluation methods for urban transportation plans

AU - Himanen, Veli

PY - 1985

Y1 - 1985

N2 - A conceptual picture of traffic and its partial factors is formulated as a starting point for an evaluation method for urban transportation plans. The accuracy of the calculation methods is clarified and the properties of the different evaluation methods are studied. With regard to the planning process the development of the evaluation method is limited thus that we start from a situation where the plans to be compared already exist. Thus it is not necessary to examine problem setting, formulation of alternatives and goal setting. The consequences of traffic can he split up into five groups: freedom of movement, safety, environmental effects, money and energy. The consequences can further be studied at local, national and global level from various viewpoints. The examination can be made on the basis of measured or calculated values, or from the examiner's subjective viewpoint. In addition to these direct consequences traffic has also indirect influences on other systems. Cost-benefit analysis contains theoretical weaknesses in the evaluation of the consequences in monetary terms. In multicriteria analysis the corresponding weaknesses are due to the artificiality of the formulation of goals and weights. Consequence analysis does not have the same weaknesses. In consequence analysis the impacts of traffic are presented from the viewpoint of different groups. The influences of the plan on other systems are also studied. A summary of the analysis is drafted for decision-making. The summary compares the gains obtained with the losses. The report includes instructions for and an example of the use of consequence analysis.

AB - A conceptual picture of traffic and its partial factors is formulated as a starting point for an evaluation method for urban transportation plans. The accuracy of the calculation methods is clarified and the properties of the different evaluation methods are studied. With regard to the planning process the development of the evaluation method is limited thus that we start from a situation where the plans to be compared already exist. Thus it is not necessary to examine problem setting, formulation of alternatives and goal setting. The consequences of traffic can he split up into five groups: freedom of movement, safety, environmental effects, money and energy. The consequences can further be studied at local, national and global level from various viewpoints. The examination can be made on the basis of measured or calculated values, or from the examiner's subjective viewpoint. In addition to these direct consequences traffic has also indirect influences on other systems. Cost-benefit analysis contains theoretical weaknesses in the evaluation of the consequences in monetary terms. In multicriteria analysis the corresponding weaknesses are due to the artificiality of the formulation of goals and weights. Consequence analysis does not have the same weaknesses. In consequence analysis the impacts of traffic are presented from the viewpoint of different groups. The influences of the plan on other systems are also studied. A summary of the analysis is drafted for decision-making. The summary compares the gains obtained with the losses. The report includes instructions for and an example of the use of consequence analysis.

KW - traffic

KW - traffic planning

KW - transportation

KW - evaluation

KW - methods

KW - traffic safety

KW - traffic surveys

M3 - Report

SN - 951-38-2221-4

T3 - Valtion teknillinen tutkimuskeskus. Tiedotteita

BT - Evaluation methods for urban transportation plans

PB - VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

CY - Espoo

ER -

Himanen V. Evaluation methods for urban transportation plans. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 1985. 80 p. (Valtion teknillinen tutkimuskeskus. Tiedotteita; No. 346).